Chronological Study (012/365)

Genesis 32:1 – 35:27


THE GOD OF ISRAEL
(Genesis 32-33)

Genesis 32:1-2 says, “Now as Jacob went on his way, the angels of God met him. Jacob said when he saw them, ‘This is God’s camp.’ So he named that place Mahanaim.”

Reminiscent of Jacob’s vision of the ladder/stairway to Heaven (28:16-17), Jacob again is granted access to see into the spiritual realm. This time, he notices that the angels are with him, not merely going up and down between Heaven and earth. The word “camp” is the Hebrew word מַֽחֲנֶה [H4264] maḥănê (makh-an-ay’), which means a camp, host, or company, whether of soldiers or tribes. And the word “Mahanaim” Jacob chose to name the location is the Hebrew מַֽחֲנַיִם [H4266] maḥănayim (makh-an-ay’-yim), which is the dual of the prior word and means two camps. In other words, Jacob essentially exclaimed, “My camp is here, but so is a heavenly camp of the Lord’s angels!” Whereas Bethel (which means “house of God”), suggested a fixed location for GOD, this maḥănê (camp) implies that the Lord’s heavenly army is mobile. Indeed, GOD is with Jacob, just as He promised He would be (28:15).

In 32:3-5, knowing that he is returning to the land of his father, Jacob takes the initiative to reconnect with his brother Esau because he knows that he will eventually be forced to confront his past. Seeking to find favor in his brother’s sight, Jacob instructs his messengers to go ahead of him to Esau. In the Hebrew, word play is involved between 32:1 and 32:3 with the word מַלְאָךְ [H4397] mal’āḵ (mal-awk’), which does mean messenger when referring to a mere human, but is also translated to mean an angel when referring to the Lord’s messenger. So, the Lord sent messengers (angels) from His camp to meet Jacob, and Jacob decides to send messengers from his camp to meet Esau. When Jacob sends his messengers, he instructs them to address Esau as “lord” and to refer to Jacob as his “servant”. Now, when Jacob calls Esau “lord”, it is important to understand that Jacob is not referring to him as the Lord, or acknowledging him as a god; rather, the word “lord” is the Hebrew אָדוֹן [H113] ‘āḏôn (aw-done’), which means a king, a master, an owner, or someone who is in control. Thus, Jacob acknowledging and declaring himself to be in a lower position than Esau was an act of humility. In fact, this act of humility is a redemptive role reversal of when Jacob took advantage of Esau in order to acquire his birthright and blessing (25:29-34; 27:5-38). Essentially, Jacob’s actions declared that he was not first; moreover, he desired for Esau to be blessed.

In 32:6-8, Jacob’s messengers returned and stated that Esau was coming to meet him and that 400 men were with Esau. This news terrified Jacob. Why? Because in 27:41-42, the last memory he had of his brother is when his mother informed him that Esau intended to murder him. After all, with only 318 men, Abraham defeated the combined forces of four kings (14:14-16), so 400 men had the potential of completely wiping out Jacob and his entire line. Consequently, Jacob divided everyone and everything into two camps, thinking that if Esau attacked them, then at least one camp might be able to escape with their lives. Now, the Hebrew word used is מַֽחֲנֶה [H4264] maḥănê (makh-an-ay’), which is the same word that was used to describe the two camps of Jacob’s tribe and the angels of the Lord in 32:1-2. At first, Jacob was one whole camp, but then the fear of his brother tore him in half into two camps. But if the second camp was supposed to be the angels of the Lord who were with him, why did Jacob allow the fear of his brother to overcome him? Simply put, the reason is because Jacob was human and he allowed his emotions to overcome the logical truth that the Lord’s angels were with him. However, despite his fear, in 32:9-12, Jacob responded by turning to the Lord in prayer. Though Jacob did use GOD’s personal name (YHWH) for the first time, Jacob prayed to the GOD of Abraham and Isaac, revealing yet again that he had not committed himself wholeheartedly to a personal relationship with the Lord. In his prayer, he reminded the Lord of all that the Lord had promised him and then he requested for the Lord’s protection while also humbly acknowledging the fact that he was undeserving of all the love and faithfulness the Lord had already shown him, recognizing that he started with nothing and is now blessed to even be able to be two camps. Jacob reflected on his decision to walk with the Lord and how it brought him blessings. Why would the GOD of Bethel abandon him now? Truly, there’s only two paths we can walk in life, either the path of righteousness or the path of wickedness (Deuteronomy 11:26-28; 30:15-20; Proverbs 3:6-7; Ezekiel 18; John 3:18-21; Romans 1:28; 1John 3:4-10). C.S. Lewis might have said it best: “There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.’ ” And so Jacob stayed where he was at while waiting for the Lord to guide him under His protection.

In Genesis 32:13-21, Jacob attempted to spend the night where he was at, but apparently was unable to sleep. While waiting for the Lord to respond to his prayer of protection, Jacob formulated a plan and then took action. Jacob decided to send ahead of him a peace offering gift of over 500 animals for Esau to keep for himself. This gift was larger than many towns would have been able to pay in tribute to conquering kings even at later dates, indicating just how much GOD had blessed Jacob. Not only did Jacob send over 500 animals, but in a tactical move of defense, he sent them one drove at a time, and put a space between each drove. If Esau and his men had in mind to conquer and plunder, this would have potentially saved them the trouble of exerting energy in battle. After sending the peace offering ahead of him, Jacob was still unable to sleep and so in 32:22-23, he decided to send everyone and everything across the shallow point of the Jabbok (yab-boke’) river to continue their journey even though it was still dark outside.

However, in 32:24-32, this decision to send everyone and everything across the river left Jacob alone on the other side, and abruptly, “a man” wrestled with him until daybreak. Thus, Scripture reveals a theme of mankind’s unceasing desire to wrestle against each other and against GOD. At first, Leah and Rachel wrestled against each other (30:7-8), then Laban and Jacob wrestled against each other (29:25; 31:26-30), and now Jacob finds himself wrestling with a mysterious “man”. Now, when this “man” saw that Jacob wouldn’t allow Him to prevail against Jacob, the “man” dislocated the socket of Jacob’s thigh where it meets his hip and then He told Jacob to let Him go because the dawn was breaking. Jacob, however, said he refused to let go until the “man” blessed him. In response to Jacob’s request to be blessed, the “man” asked Jacob, “What is your name?” And Jacob answered, “Jacob.” However, the “man” said, “Your name shall no longer be Jacob, but Israel; for you have striven with God and with men and have prevailed.” Jacob then asked for the name of the “man”, but His response was only, “Why is it that you ask my name?” And then the “man” blessed Jacob. And then as it is written, Jacob named the place Peniel because he said, “I have seen God face to face, yet my life has been preserved.” And then as the sun came up, and the “man” was gone, Jacob continued his journey, limping.

As previously discussed in the topic of theophany, the “man” in this story is none other than the preincarnate Christ, the Lord Himself. For this reason, Jacob named the location פְּנוּאֵל [H6439] penû’ēl (pen-oo-ale’), which means face of God or facing God. It is also the reason the Lord said to Jacob, “you have striven with God and with men and have prevailed.” How did Jacob prevail? Because he refused to give up; he was determined to be blessed. Jacob refused to let go of the Lord and so he received the Lord’s blessing! Hosea 12:3 will later recount this event by saying, “In the womb he took his brother by the heel, And in his maturity he contended with God.”

Now, even though Jacob said that he had seen GOD “face to face”, that does not mean he literally saw the entirety of the Lord’s face. Not only is this an expression that describes personal or intimate contact, but we must remember that the entire wrestling match happened during the darkness of night. For this reason, I believe the Lord instructed Jacob to let go of Him prior to sunrise so that Jacob would not be able to see His face entirely. In fact, the Lord chose to dislocate the socket of Jacob’s thigh to initiate a conclusion to the wrestling match because Jacob refused to let go until he received a blessing. However, to receive His blessing, Jacob had to answer a simple question: “What is your name?” And Jacob answered, “Jacob.” But why did Jacob’s answer of such a simple truth earn him the blessing? Because Jacob’s history had been centered around lies regarding his identity. In Genesis 27:18-19, Isaac asked Jacob who he was, but Jacob lied and claimed to be Esau, the person who rightfully deserved the blessing. But this time, Jacob told the truth and humbly confessed his character flaw and his true identity – he is Jacob, the heel grabber, deceiver, and supplanter (25:26; 27:36). In his past, Jacob had been determined to be blessed even if he had to receive his blessing through deceitful deeds. Though Jacob is still seeking to be blessed (which is a good desire), he is now humble and desires to receive blessings through honesty and hard work. Due to Jacob’s character development over 20 years of being deceived by Laban, Jacob was now humble enough to receive the Lord’s blessing. Hence, the Lord renamed him from Jacob to “Israel”, which is the Hebrew יִשְׂרָאֵל [H3478] yiśrā’ēl (yis-raw-ale’), which means God’s power, God prevails, God fights, or God contends. Thus, the Lord made it known that every blessing and victory Jacob will ever receive will not come from Jacob’s own power out from deception, but due to the Lord’s power, holiness, love, and grace. However, the name Israel also has a meaning of contending with GOD, implying that Jacob wrestled with GOD and will no longer strive against man because all his struggles will now be taken directly to the Lord. And the fact that Jacob wrestled the Lord in the darkness and then became Israel when the sun came up showcases the image of salvation! Consider the following:

In Isaiah 9:2, the prophet speaks of hope in the Messiah and says, “The people who walk in darkness Will see a great light; Those who live in a dark land, The light will shine on them.” And then Jesus quotes this verse in Matthew 4:16.

In John 8:12, Jesus says, “I am the Light of the world; he who follows Me will not walk in the darkness, but will have the Light of life.”

In John 12:46, Jesus says, “I have come as Light into the world, so that everyone who believes in Me will not remain in darkness.”

In Acts 26:18, after Jesus blinded Paul (Saul) with light brighter than the sun, Jesus commanded Paul to open the eyes of both Jews and Gentiles “so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in [Christ].”

In Romans 13:12, Paul says, “The night is almost gone, and the day is near. Therefore let us lay aside the deeds of darkness and put on the armor of light.”

In Ephesians 5:8, Paul says, “you were formerly darkness, but now you are Light in the Lord; walk as children of Light.”

In Colossians 1:13-14, Paul says, “13 For He rescued us from the domain of darkness, and transferred us to the kingdom of His beloved Son, 14 in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.”

In 1Thessalonians 5:4-6, Paul says, “But you, brethren, are not in darkness, that the day would overtake you like a thief; for you are all sons of light and sons of day. We are not of night nor of darkness; so then let us not sleep as others do, but let us be alert and sober.”

In 1Peter 2:9-10, Peter says, “But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession, so that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; 10 for you once were not a people, but now you are the people of God; you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.”

Therefore, Jacob – now Israel – is a representative of GOD-Almighty and now walks in the light as a chosen child of GOD of the royal priesthood. However, so that Israel would understand not to rely on his own power, the Lord dislocated the socket of his thigh; consequently, Israel continued on his journey, blessed by the Lord, but humbled and limping, no longer able to run away from the consequences of his choices. And this entire story paints a beautiful picture that when a person seeks the Lord in prayer and asks to be rescued, that person will encounter a wrestling match with the Lord due to his/her sinful nature of darkness. And when that person wrestles with the Lord while seeking the Lord’s blessing, that person will never walk the same again because that person will be changed, will become a new person, will not rely upon his/her own strength, and will rely upon the Lord. That person will be changed and will walk in the light as a chosen child of GOD of the royal priesthood! Israel became a wrestler who overcomes and receives blessings because the Lord took hold of him. The Lord taught Israel not to grab at the heel of any man, but to hold on to GOD and never let go. If you set out to grab onto GOD, GOD will grab hold of you! For this reason, it is written in James 4:8, “Draw near to God and He will draw near to you.” And when the Lord grabs hold of you, truly, as it is written in 2Corinthians 5:17, “Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.” For this reason, it is also written in Revelation 2:17, “To him who overcomes, to him I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, and a new name written on the stone which no one knows but he who receives it.”

In Genesis 33:1-3, Israel, now limping, and still having not slept the night before, yet sober and alert, looked up and noticed that Esau and his 400 men were coming toward him. With adrenaline flowing through his veins, Israel divided the children among the two maids, Leah, and Rachel, putting the maids and their children in front, Leah and her children after them, and then Rachel and Joseph last. Why did he do this? Favoritism. Israel positioned them according to prioritized favor, which would have allowed Rachel and Joseph the best opportunity to flee for their lives if Esau and his men attacked. And with Joseph being the only child listed by name, Scripture is setting the stage for his prominent position we will later see. However, in a selfless and masculine act of love, Israel then “passed on ahead of them and bowed down to the ground seven times, until he came near to his brother”, placing himself between the women and children and the potential threat. Before Israel wrestled with GOD, he planned to stay behind and use his servants as shields to protect himself (32:16-21); however, after receiving his new name and identity, he decided to go ahead of everyone in an act of sacrificial love. This is an example of how the love of GOD changes us from the inside out and realigns us with GOD’s will! The fact that he bowed down to the ground seven times showcases total submission, signifying to Esau that if he had any intentions of battle, then Israel surrendered in advance. Essentially, Israel gave honor to Esau while also requesting mercy and pleading for peace. And then 33:4 says that Esau ran to Israel. How would you feel in that moment if you were Israel, not knowing if your brother is running toward you with excitement or with rage? Yet the verse continues by saying that Esau embraced Israel and then they both wept. 20 years of emotions streamed down their faces in the form of tears. By Esau forgiving Jacob and not attacking him, Esau was showing Jacob the love of GOD (Matthew 6:12-15; 18:21-35; Mark 11:25; Luke 6:37; 7:47; 11:4; 17:3-4; 2Corinthians 2:7-8; Colossians 3:13). After all, as it is written, ‘the one who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has not seen” (1John 4:20; see also, 1Timothy 5:8).

In Genesis 33:5-11, Israel continues to address Esau as “lord” and refers to himself as “servant” while explaining that all the animals Esau had seen were a gift for him. Esau, addressing Israel as his “brother” declines the gift at first, but at Israel’s insistence, he finally accepts the gift. Esau’s acceptance of the gift was important to Israel because this was restitution for the wrongdoings he had committed against his brother 20 years ago. Now, in 33:10, when Israel said, “I see your face as one sees the face of God, and you have received me favorably”, he was not implying that Esau was like a god, but merely making a connection of the fact that Esau received him favorably and spared his life just like the “man” did who recently blessed him (32:30). If you remember, Israel believed he saw the “face of God” in that “man” who received him favorably, blessed him, and spared his life. Thus, to be received with such favor is like the encounter he had with the Lord. Therefore, when we act like the Lord, people will see the Lord when they look at us.

In 33:12, Esau says, “Let us take our journey and go, and I will go before you.” The minor details in the language are important. Esau used inclusive language such as “us” and “our” to communicate to his brother that there is no division between them. Further, Esau even offered to go before Israel, signifying that he will ensure Israel’s safety. However, in 33:13-18, Israel, still addressing his brother as “lord” and referring to himself as “servant”, explains that he is unable to travel with Esau and his men because their fast pace would be a strain on all the youth of the children and animals. And then for reasons unknown, Israel tells Esau that he would eventually meet him in Seir (say-eer’). However, the remainder of the passage goes on to state that Israel traveled in the opposite direction to Succoth and then on to Shechem, without ever mentioning Israel going to Seir. Why not? Did Israel lie to his brother? Did he visit him at some point later on yet Scripture doesn’t mention it? Scripture is silent on the matter, but the immediate context seems to imply that Israel won’t allow himself to trust Esau, and he simply desires to continue on his journey without meeting up with his brother. All known details seem to imply that Israel didn’t want to inform Esau where he was going or what he was about to do. Of course, that is mere speculation, but I believe it is a reasonable belief considering all available evidence.

Though Scripture does not say anything more regarding Seir, Scripture does state that the Lord brought Israel back safely to the land of Canaan into the city of Shechem, thus mostly fulfilling His promise made 20 years ago (28:15). And then 33:19-20 concludes with Israel purchasing some land in that city, fulfilling GOD’s promise to Abraham (12:7). Israel then possibly reconstructs the altar Abraham had built there, by building an altar and calling it “El-Elohe-Israel.” Why is this important? Because “El-Elohe-Israel” means “God, the God of Israel”. Therefore, Israel finally made the decision to have a personal relationship with the Lord rather than referring to the Lord as “the God of Abraham” or “the God of Isaac”. The Lord is now the GOD of Israel.

  • In Genesis 32:1-2, Jacob had been in awe that a camp of the Lord’s angels had been with him. But are you aware that a heavenly host of the Lord’s angels are with you wherever you are? Do you have the same sense of awe? If you could see them where you are right now, how would that change your perspective regarding your current circumstance?
  • In 32:3-5, Jacob took the initiative to restore the relationship with his brother. What followed was a successful restoration and an encounter with the Lord which concluded with the Lord blessing Jacob. But what about you? Is there a relationship that has been broken between you and someone else because of the wrong you’ve committed? If so, are you willing to take the initiative to restore that relationship?
  • In 32:9-12, Jacob’s first response to his fear and uncertainty regarding his future was to pray to the Lord. But what about you? Is prayer your last resort or your first response?
  • If there are only two paths we can walk, then there are really only two camps in which we can dwell. Where are you walking? In which campground do you dwell?
  • In 32:24-32, Jacob refused to let go of the Lord; consequently, he received His blessing. But what about you? Regardless of circumstances, are you determined to never let go of the Lord until you receive His blessing?
  • We must be persistent in our faith and refuse to let go of GOD until we are blessed (Matthew 7:7-11; Luke 18:1-8; 11:5-13)! Where in your spiritual life do you need the persistence and endurance of a wrestler?
  • In order for Jacob to be blessed by the Lord, he first had to confess his true identity and character flaws of being sinful. Only those who confess their sinful nature showcase a need for the Lord’s blessing. 1John 1:9 says, “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” Are you willing to confess your sinful nature?
  • Every wrestling match Jacob ever found himself in, he came out victorious. Have you wrestled with your identity? Have you wrestled against your sinful nature? Have you wrestled against your pride? Have you wrestled against addiction? What things in your life do you need to wrestle against and come out victorious?
  • Jacob had been named after his character. But what about you? What if you were named after your character? What would be your name? Liar? Murderer? Pervert? Lustful? Angry? Cheater? Jerk? So… what is your name? Who are you? Confess your name and confess your sins. Wrestle with the Lord and ask for a new identity. What name do you want to have? What would you like to be called? Helper? Encourager? Trustworthy? Honest? Man of GOD? Woman of GOD?
  • Have you had a personal wrestling encounter with the Lord that ended up in you being changed and never walking the same again? If so, what is your story? And have you shared that story with anyone? If you have a testimony, are you willing to share your story? Just as we needed to hear Jacob’s story, don’t you think there are people who need to hear your story?
  • In Genesis 33:3, Israel placed himself between the women and children and a potential attacker even though he had been injured, he was exhausted, and without sleep. In John 15:13, Jesus says, “Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends.” So, are you loving enough to place yourself between the enemy and those who are weaker or innocent?
  • In Genesis 33:10, Israel saw the Lord in Esau due to his lovingkindness. But what about you? When people look at you, do they see a reflection of the Lord? If you have been changed by the Lord, do you not realize that when people look at you, they should see a representative of GOD-Almighty who now walks in the light as a chosen child of GOD of the royal priesthood?

 

DEDICATION TO DINAH
(Genesis 34)

Genesis 34:1 says that Leah’s daughter, Dinah, went out one day to visit with other daughters of the land. But 34:2 says, “When Shechem the son of Hamor the Hivite, the prince of the land, saw her, he took her and lay with her by force.” Now, Dinah was not to blame for Shechem raping her; Shechem would have been the only person condemned in this scenario. However, a curious question does arise regarding Dinah’s situation: why did she go out to visit with the other daughters of the land? Did she have a good reason to leave the safety of her home or did she go when she should not have traveled? In 1Timothy 5:13, Paul says that some young women, “learn to be idle, as they go around from house to house; and not merely idle, but also gossips and busybodies, talking about things not proper to mention.” So, did Dinah go where she should not have been? We don’t know; Scripture is silent on the matter. But because Scripture describes this event as if it were a normal occurrence for Dinah, it seems likely that she was completely innocent. However, Dinah’s innocence seems to have been combined with complacency. Had she traveled alone? If so, it’s likely that her youthful immaturity led her to be isolated and vulnerable to the attack. But again, even if Dinah had somehow set herself up to enter into a dangerous scenario, Shechem would be the only person condemned in this scenario; Dinah was a victim. However, it’s always good to thoughtfully consider how events unfolded and why things happened the way they did.

It is written that Shechem is the son of Hamor the Hivite. If you remember, Genesis 10:17 informed us that the Hivites are descendants of Ham (one of Noah’s sons), through the Canaanites. They were indigenous inhabitants of the promised land, and they were usually referred to along with other groups such as the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, and Jebusites. Later in our chronological journey, the Lord will command the Israelites to conquer these people and take over the promised land (Exodus 3:8; 23:23; Deuteronomy 7:1).

Genesis 34:3 says, “He was deeply attracted to Dinah the daughter of Jacob, and he loved the girl and spoke tenderly to her.” Now, when it says that “He was deeply attracted to” Dinah, that English translation comes from two Hebrew words. First, the word דָּבַק [H1692] dāḇaq (dawb-vak’) means to stick to, to cling to, and hence, connected to [someone/something]. Second, the word נֶפֶשׁ [H5315] nep̄ešh (neh’-fesh) means soul, self, life, person, living being, that which breathes the breath of life. Therefore, the Hebrew literally means that Shechem’s soul had connected to Dinah’s soul and stuck to her. As a natural consequence of that sexual relation with her, he experienced and felt the power of GOD’s design of two becoming one (2:24). However, Shechem acted sinfully outside of GOD’s design because Dinah was not his wife and she had been unwilling to become one with him. And because his soul had connected to her, he realized that he “loved” her. Though the Hebrew word אָהַב [H157] ‘āhaḇ (aw-hav’) does mean to love, the irony of this situation is that the proper context of the scenario reveals the opposite. Obviously Shechem did not love Dinah; if he had loved her, he would not have raped her. The truth is that his initial feeling had been lust, not love. However, after he experienced the beauty of his soul connecting to her soul and becoming one with her, he then desired to love her. When Scripture says he spoke “tenderly” to her, the Hebrew word לֵב [H3820] lēḇ (lave) means the inner person, mind, heart, will, conscious understanding. Therefore, the Hebrew literally means that Shechem attempted to speak to Dinah’s heart, the inner most part of who she is, with the hope of her understanding his words. However, that action should have preceded the action of sexual intercourse. And because Shechem defied GOD’s design, he defiled Dinah.

In 34:4, Shechem spoke to his father, Hamor, and requested that he acquire Dinah to be his wife. In 35:5, Jacob heard that Dinah had been defiled. Scripture doesn’t state how Jacob heard, but it seems likely that Dinah went back home and shared the horrible news with her father. However, because his sons were tending livestock in a field, Jacob decided to stay silent until his sons returned home. According to James 1:19-20, Jacob’s initial silence seems to be wise, for it is written, “19 But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; 20 for the anger of man does not achieve the righteousness of God.”

In Genesis 34:6-10, Hamor went to Jacob in order to arrange a marriage between Shechem and Dinah. By this point, Jacob’s sons had also heard the news and arrived, extremely angry. In Hamor’s negotiation for marriage on behalf of his son, he presented an offer of intermarriage, saying, “give your daughters to us and take our daughters for yourselves.” The end goal of this deal would be to unite as one large tribe who would share all the land and resources within the land, thus ensuring their strength and survival. In 34:11-12, Shechem added that he would do whatever it takes and pay any price as long as he could have Dinah as his wife. Though a bride price was typical in the Ancient Near East, it is written in Song of Solomon 8:7 that money cannot purchase love. And how could Dinah ever love the man who raped her? How could Dinah’s father and brothers ever allow her rapist to purchase her? Because Shechem had defiled Dinah, in Genesis 34:13-17, Jacob’s sons answered Shechem and his father with deceit, telling them that they would only be able to agree to this deal if all males from their tribe became circumcised as they were, because uncircumcision was a disgrace to them. The Hebrew word for “deceit” is מִרְמָה [H4820] mirmâ (meer-maw’), which means deception with a malicious motive. This is the same word used in 27:35 when Isaac told Esau, “Your brother came deceitfully and has taken away your blessing.” Certainly, Jacob had once been known as a deceiver, but now his sons are far surpassing any deceitful ploy Jacob ever did because their motive in their deception is much darker than anything Jacob ever planned.

Surprisingly, in 34:18, the counteroffer Jacob’s sons presented seemed good and reasonable to both Hamor and Shechem. Now, I can understand why it might have seemed reasonable to Shechem since his desire to have Dinah was so strong, but I am surprised that his father, Hamor, would also believe the demand to be reasonable. What did Hamor have to gain from getting circumcised? But then 34:19-24 reveals an even greater surprise in that the entire tribe agrees to this demand as well. However, the details within those verses explains why they all agreed to the demand of circumcision. In 34:19, Scripture reveals that Shechem was the most respected person in his father’s household. Why? Well, 34:2 informs us that Shechem was “the prince of the land”. But if Shechem was the prince of the land, then it is reasonable to believe that his father, Hamor, was the king or chief of the land. And in 34:20-24, both Hamor and Shechem convinced their people that not only would they receive Jacob’s daughters for their wives, but all of Jacob’s livestock and property would become their own, and by becoming one large tribe, they would become stronger, which would better ensure their safety and survival from potential enemies. Thus, Scripture reveals a picture of deceit from both sides: Jacob’s sons have ulterior motives for convincing Hamor’s tribe to get circumcised; likewise, Hamor’s tribe has ulterior motives for allowing Jacob’s tribe to unite with them. Thus, this tense scenario is like watching two spiders who desire to eat each other – who will initiate the first move of attack and who will be consumed?

In 34:25-26, on the third day after Hamor’s tribe circumcised themselves, while they were still in pain, Simeon and Levi went through the city and killed every male of Hamor’s tribe with the sword. But why did they kill all of the males? Why not just Shechem? We truly don’t know the character of any of those males who got killed, but if Shechem was the prince of the land and his father, Hamor, was the king/chief of the land, then it would have been too risky to keep the other males alive. However, this was an evil deed because circumcision was the sign of the covenant between GOD and His people that would bring divine blessing (17:10-14). The only people who should be circumcised are those who worship GOD (YHWH) and acknowledge Abraham as their father in the faith. While Jacob’s sons were right to insist that circumcision would be necessary in order for both tribes to become one people, their decision to keep GOD out of their plans was wrong. So, not only did Jacob’s sons instruct Hamor’s tribe to do what GOD never commanded them to do, but then Simeon and Levi murdered all the males who received GOD’s covenant. But why did Simeon and Levi murder the males with the sword? Simeon was son #2 and Levi was son #3, both of them brothers to Dinah, sharing Leah as their mother.

After killing Hamor and Shechem, it is written that they took Dinah from Shechem’s house. This means that Dinah had been used as bait, living with Shechem in his house for at least three days until her brothers came and removed her from his house. Though it is almost certain that Shechem didn’t have another opportunity to rape her again due to him being circumcised and in pain, she still lived with her rapist for at least three days. In addition to the trauma Dinah experienced from being raped and then having to live with her rapist for at least three days, she also witnessed Shechem get killed by the sword. Through all of this, the true victim in this scenario had been overlooked; Dinah was neither consulted nor comforted. Can you imagine the trauma Dinah experienced?

In 34:27-29, the remainder of Jacob’s sons went through the city and took plunder from all the slain. In 34:23, Hamor’s tribe had schemed to take all of Jacob’s livestock, but in 34:28-29, in a great reversal, Jacob’s sons took not only all of Hamor’s livestock, but also the surviving children and females. Thus, many Hivites became absorbed into the tribe of Jacob.

In 34:30, angry with Simeon and Levi, Jacob told them that their actions caused the tribe of Jacob to be hated among the inhabitants of the land, among the Canaanites and the Perizzites. Further, believing that the other inhabitants would wage war against them, Jacob feared that they would be destroyed and erased from history. However, because Jacob had remained silent and never took action, Jacob’s sons challenged his leadership and authority and asked their father in 34:31, “Should he treat our sister as a harlot?” However, Jacob does not answer. Perhaps the inspired Scripture ends with Jacob’s silence as a reminder that Jacob’s failure to intervene at an earlier stage may have contributed to the outcome. Regardless, his silence seems to fit his character and calls to remembrance what is written in 25:27: “When the boys grew up, Esau became a skillful hunter, a man of the field, but Jacob was a peaceful man, living in tents.”

  • Genesis 34 is an often overlooked, avoided, and rarely discussed chapter in the Bible, but Dinah deserves some time for dedicated discussion. This entire chapter was included in the Holy Spirit inspired Scriptures as a dedication to Dinah due to the devastation and division caused by the lack of devotion to Dinah and her defilement. I, for one, am in absolute awe that the Lord loved Dinah so much that He made certain that her story would be included in sacred Scripture. But what about you? Do you truly comprehend how much love the Lord had for Dinah?
  • In 34:1-2, Dinah got raped by Shechem because she had most likely put herself in a dangerous situation due to lacking both situational awareness and self-defense training. But what about you? Do you go to places you ought not go? Even if you travel to places that are common, do you travel alone and make yourself vulnerable to attack? Are you aware of your surroundings at all times? Have you been trained in any type of self-defense course?
  • Have you been a victim of rape? If so, have you received counseling? Have you been able to heal both emotionally and spiritually?
  • Do the exegeted details of 34:3 help you to better understand the depth beyond the surface of sexual intercourse? Are you able to better understand GOD’s design of two becoming one?
  • Because Jacob remained silent and failed to follow through with any fatherly leadership (34:5), his sons decided to take matters into their own hands and they conjured up a plan to murder the tribe of Hamor (34:13-29). How would you have responded if you were Jacob?
  • Shechem freely chose to rape a woman named Dinah; consequently, Jacob’s sons murdered the entire tribe connected with Shechem and then captured all remaining children and females, absorbing them into their own tribe. Can you see how far the reach of sin can go? Do you understand how destructive sin can be when we allow sin to be master over us?
  • Are you able to put yourself in the place of Dinah and understand how she might have felt? Dinah had been a victim, but Jacob’s sons created multiple new victims by capturing the children and females alive. The children most likely witnessed their fathers get murdered. The females most likely witnessed their husbands get murdered. Are you able to put yourself in the place of all the children and females who got captured and understand how they might have felt?
  • In 34:31, Jacob’s sons essentially presented the argument that their actions of murdering the tribe of Hamor was justified due to Shechem defiling Dinah and treating her as if she had been a harlot. Though this type of behavior was common in the Ancient Near East, do you believe that their actions were justified? Why or why not?
  • As Christians within the new covenant, what does the Word tell us regarding seeking revenge?
  • As the chronological story of the Bible continues, we will see that Dinah is never mentioned again and that she faded into oblivion. But even when everyone else seems to forget, GOD remembers. When no one seems to notice, GOD notices. When no one else seems to care, GOD cares. When you feel all alone, GOD is present. Think: GOD’s love is the reason this chapter is dedicated to Dinah. So, what does GOD want us to learn from Dinah’s drama? First, we must not allow sexual passion to boil over into evil actions. Passion must be controlled. Sexual sin is devastating because of its eternal consequences (1Corinthians 6:15-20; 10:8-13). Second, we are called to overcome evil by doing good (Romans 12:21). Third, we are to love our enemies (Matthew 5:38-48; Luke 6:27-36). Fourth, we are not to seek revenge because GOD is the Avenger (Deuteronomy 32:35; Romans 12:17-19; Matthew 26:52).

WHO’S YOUR DADDY?
(Genesis 35:1-27)

In Genesis 34, Jacob failed to lead as a father after his daughter Dinah got raped; consequently, Jacob’s sons decided to take matters into their own hands and they murdered Hamor’s entire tribe and then looted the city. As a result, Jacob feared that the other inhabitants of the land would join forces to kill him and his entire tribe. However, in 35:1, GOD the Father does not fail to lead and He instructs Jacob to return to Bethel, dwell there, and make an altar there to Him who appeared to Jacob 20 years ago after he fled from his brother, Esau. Now, if you remember, in 28:15, the Lord said to Jacob, “Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land; for I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.” But what was “this” land? Bethel – the location where the Lord revealed Himself to Jacob in the vision of the stairway to Heaven.

So, in 35:2-3, encouraged and emboldened by his encounter with the Lord, Jacob commands his tribe to get rid of the foreign “gods” among them, to purify themselves, change their garments, and then after doing so, they would all travel to Bethel in order to make an altar to his GOD who has been with him through everything and never left him. And surprisingly, in 35:4, everyone falls into line and acts in faithful obedience to Jacob’s command once again: “So they gave to Jacob all the foreign gods which they had and the rings which were in their ears, and Jacob hid them under the oak which was near Shechem.”

Now, this oak tree is likely the same “oak of Moreh” (mo-reyh’) mentioned in 12:6 when Abram traveled to the “site of Shechem” where the Lord appeared to Abram and promised him that the land would belong to his descendants, and then Abram built an altar there to the Lord. But why did Jacob’s entire tribe have to be told to get rid of the foreign “gods” among them? Well, evidently the foreign “gods” Rachel stole from Laban (31:19) were still with her, but it’s also likely that some of the foreign “gods” came from the plunder they took after murdering Hamor’s tribe and looting the city (34:25-29). But Jacob commanded his tribe to get rid of those idols.

The burial of these idols at Shechem may be symbolically significant, implying that the wicked actions of Simeon and Levi reflect the influence of polytheism. In fact, later on in our chronological journey, we will see in 1Corinthians 10:20-22 that Paul says, “20 the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons and not to God; and I do not want you to become sharers in demons. 21 You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons. 22 Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? We are not stronger than He, are we?” Therefore, Jacob was preparing his family to properly worship the Lord for when they arrive in Bethel.

In Genesis 34:30, Jacob worried that all the other inhabitants of the land would unite together to kill him and his entire tribe; however, 35:5 states that GOD had placed a great terror upon all the surrounding cities so that they did not pursue Jacob’s tribe as they traveled. So, in 35:6-7, Jacob and his tribe arrive in Luz (which will later become known as Bethel) and Jacob builds and altar there, calling the place “El-bethel” (which means “God of Bethel”, or “The God of the house of God”). In 28:18, Jacob had only constructed a pillar to GOD, but now he constructs an altar to GOD, revealing a personal relationship with the Lord and acknowledging how GOD has been faithful to him.

Now, in 35:8, the narration seems to be abruptly interrupted and says, “Now Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, died, and she was buried below Bethel under the oak; it was named Allon-bacuth” [al-lone’ baw-kooth’] (which means “oak of weeping”). But why is the death of Rebekah’s nurse mentioned yet the death of Rebekah is never mentioned? Why was there never any weeping for Rebekah mentioned? And why was Rebekah’s nurse with Jacob anyway? In 24:59, Rebekah’s nurse is briefly mentioned, yet without name. Here, a name of the nurse has been given as Deborah. It’s possible that her presence with Jacob suggests that she had been sent to him by Rebekah in fulfillment of her promise in 27:45 when she said, “I will send and get you from there”. Nevertheless, Scripture is silent on the matter and so all guesses are mere conjecture. However, one thing seems to be certain: the narration regarding Deborah’s burial is not an abrupt interruption; rather, it is a continuation of the previous narration and showcases a stark contrast to the burial of the false “gods”. No tears were shed while burying the false “gods”; to be rid of those false “gods” is a good riddance. However, there was weeping involved in Deborah’s death.

In 35:9-10, it is written that GOD blessed Jacob. This not only confirms the blessing he received from the Lord in his wrestling match in 32:29, but more importantly, it places Jacob on a par with Abraham and Isaac, of whom similar affirmations were also made (24:1; 25:11). Not only did GOD bless Jacob, but He also reminded him that his name was no longer Jacob, but Israel. So, not only did GOD bring Israel back to the place where he first encountered the Lord (28:10-22), but GOD made it known that the GOD of Bethel is the same GOD who gave Israel his new identity back in 32:24-32 after wrestling with Jacob and dislocating the socket of his thigh. Therefore, the Lord who revealed Himself at the top of the stairway to Heaven is the same Lord who wrestled with Jacob and gave him his new name of Israel. But in 35:11, GOD gives Israel a new name by which he can call the Lord: El Shaddai (which means, “God Almighty” or “God most powerful”). And this is how GOD revealed Himself to Abraham in 17:5-6, and also how Isaac referred to GOD in 28:3-4 when he blessed Jacob. And continuing in 35:11-12, GOD Almighty says to Israel, “11 Be fruitful and multiply; A nation and a company of nations shall come from you, And kings shall come forth from you. 12 “The land which I gave to Abraham and Isaac, I will give it to you, And I will give the land to your descendants after you.”

When GOD said, “Be fruitful and multiply”, it was the same command GOD gave to Adam and Eve (1:28) and Noah and his sons (9:1), but it was also the blessing Isaac spoke to Jacob before he fled from his brother (28:3). And when GOD said that nations and kings would come from him, that was the same promise GOD gave to Abraham (17:6,16). Therefore, GOD declares that Israel is indeed the one who will continue what GOD started through Abraham.

In 35:13-16, after GOD finished speaking, Israel set up a pillar, anointed it with oil, and then the entire tribe of Israel continued on their journey toward Ephrath (ef-rawth’). However, on the way, Rachel began to give birth, but she had great difficulty and suffered severely through her labor. In 35:17, a midwife said to her, “Do not fear, for now you have another son.” In fact, the birth of this son was exactly what Rachel had desired. In 30:23-24, after giving birth to Joseph, believing that GOD had taken away her reproach, she named her son Joseph, saying, “May the Lord give me another son” because the meaning of “Joseph” is “may he add”, which implied that her prayer was for GOD to give her yet another son. Therefore, this new son was the answer to Rachel’s prayer.

However, 35:18 says that Rachel’s “soul” departed from her body while giving birth. The Hebrew word translated here as “soul” is the same word that had been used in 2:7 when GOD gave Adam the breath of life and he became a “living being”. The Hebrew word is נֶפֶשׁ [H5315] nep̄hešh (neh’-fesh), which means soul, self, life, the inner being of a person, mind, living being, creature, desire, emotion, passion, activity of the mind, will, character, that which breathes, that which possesses the breath of life. This is the same word that had been used in 1:20,21,24,30 which describes all sea, land, and air animals that possess breath. Thus, Rachel breathed her last breath and her body died while giving birth to this new son. However, in her last moments, she named her son ben-‘ônî (bane-o-nee’), which means “son of my sorrow”. But Israel quickly changed the name of his son and called him binyāmîn (bin-yaw-meen’) [or, Benjamin], which means “son of the right hand”, which indicates a place of honor and status. In fact, Jewish commentators note that this name indicates that Benjamin was Israel’s favorite son and that this is consistent with the favoritism shown to both of Rachel’s sons. And later on in our chronological journey, we will see that in a different time period, Psalm 110 will show a similar meaning for this idiom. Therefore, Israel refused to allow Benjamin to be blamed for the death of Rachel and have that horrible character trait follow him his entire life; instead, Israel celebrated the fact that even through death another life came into existence.

But was Benjamin to blame for Rachel’s death? No; in fact, Genesis 30:1 says, “when Rachel saw that she bore Jacob no children, she became jealous of her sister; and she said to Jacob, ‘Give me children, or else I die.’ ” And in 31:32, after Rachel stole Laban’s “gods”, Jacob had said to Laban, “The one with whom you find your gods shall not live”. Consequently, Rachel’s death was ironic because she did not die because she had no children; rather, she died while giving birth to a child. Further, Rachel’s death seems to be fulfillment of Jacob’s curse because Rachel had been guilty of stealing Laban’s “gods” and they were in her possession at the time of Jacob’s curse.

Therefore, 35:19 says, “Rachel died and was buried on the way to Ephrath (that is, Bethlehem).” So, Luz later becomes known as Bethel (35:6); likewise, Ephrath will later become known as Bethlehem. Because these minor and seemingly insignificant details will become important later on, we must notate them now so that we will remember them later on when these details arise again.

In 35:20, Jacob set up a pillar over Rachel’s grave, and then 35:21 says they all continued on their journey until Israel stopped and pitched his tent beyond מִגְדַּל־עֵדֶר [H4029] miḡdal-ʿēḏer (mig-dal’-ay’-der), which means “tower of the flock”, indicating that it was a shepherd’s watchtower near Ephrath (Bethlehem).

And then 35:22 seems to once again abruptly interrupt the narration and states, “It came about while Israel was dwelling in that land, that Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father’s concubine, and Israel heard of it.” But why so abrupt? Why had evil infiltrated at this time? Why Reuben? Why Bilhah? Well, Dinah had recently been raped (34:2), Israel heard about that yet he failed to take action (34:5), and so Israel’s sons bypassed the authority of their father and took matters into their own hands, murdering all males of Hamor’s tribe, and looted the city (34:13-17,25-29). Further, Rachel had just died (35:18) and they were all traveling without knowing what to expect. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that everyone had been overwhelmed by emotions and most likely filled with anxiety/stress. But the fact that Reuben had sexual relations with his father’s concubine showcases his lack of respect toward his father. Possession of the concubines that belonged to the head of the tribe was presumably a sign of leadership in the tribe. Typically, when the father died, the care and ownership of the concubines (as part of his property) passed to the next head of the tribe. But to seize ownership of the concubines prior to the father’s death would be understood as an act of subversion and disrespect (comparable to seizing land or herds), but would not be unusual if succession to tribe leadership were contested. In this context, Reuben’s offense against his father circumvented proper succession procedures and implies that his father was powerless. Regardless of motive, this act was not as abrupt as it may seem while reading the text; rather, this had been building up like a volcano ready to erupt ever since Israel failed to lead as a father when Dinah got raped.

Reuben was the firstborn and Bilhah had been Rachel’s maid. Therefore, it is likely that because Rachel was no longer around to watch over Bilhah and keep her held accountable, Bilhah seized the opportunity to pursue either pleasure or purpose for herself. But why Reuben? I believe it is reasonable to assume that because he was the firstborn, this was in some way an act of rebellion against Israel on Reuben’s part and a prideful expression of his own authority as the rightful heir and future leader of the tribe. And because Reuben was the oldest son, he would have been the one closest in age to Bilhah. Now, we cannot know for certain, but Bilhah could have chosen to have sexual relations with Reuben because she knew he was the firstborn; consequently, it’s possible that Bilhah had hopes of becoming the main woman/wife of the new future tribe. However, it’s also possible that there existed no ulterior motives other than the primal pursuit of pleasure at the expense of purpose and that they had both been merely led by lust. However, this was not only a great sin against Israel, but also against two of Reuben’s brothers because Bilhah was the mother of Dan and Naphtali (30:4-8). But 35:22 states that Israel heard about this great sin and yet Scripture does not state that Israel did anything about it. And so Israel not only failed to take action against the great sin against Dinah being raped, but now he fails to take action against this great sin of Reuben having sexual intercourse with Bilhah.

And because this great sin involves multiple people, 35:23-26 explains once again the relation between all children in Israel’s tribe. But due to the birth of Benjamin, this list is now updated and complete:

LEAH

ZILPAH

RACHEL

BILHAH

Reuben (01)

Gad (07)

Joseph (11)

Dan (05)

Simeon (02)

Asher (08)

Benjamin (12)

Naphtali (06)

Levi (03)

Judah (04)

Issachar (09)

Zebulun (10)

[Dinah]

In conclusion to this new drama, 35:27 says, “Jacob came to his father Isaac at Mamre [mam-ray’] of Kiriath-arba (that is, Hebron), where Abraham and Isaac had sojourned.” Again, the minor details that seem insignificant should be noted. Mamre was a site near Hebron where Abraham had settled (13:18; 14:13; 18:1) and where Isaac also later lived. The land of Kiriath-arba will later be known as Hebron. So, this one chapter (chapter 35) identifies three locations while clarifying their updated/current names, which indicates the time period it was written – the author wrote at a later time and explained what happened in the past. Therefore, GOD brought Israel to Hebron, which connected him with Abraham and Isaac, highlighting the fact that through Israel the continuance of GOD’s ultimate plan will be fulfilled.

However, a minor detail in 35:27 also reveals yet another omittance of Rebekah. An examination of Scripture reveals that Rebekah was omitted in chapter 30 (14 years after Jacob had fled from Esau), and she was omitted in 31:18 (20 years after Jacob had fled from Esau). Moreover, in 35:8, Scripture mentions the death of Rebekah’s nurse (Deborah) and the weeping that happened due to her death, but no mention is made of Rebekah’s death or any weeping that happened due to her death. And finally, 35:27 only mentions Israel’s father, Isaac, but Rebekah is omitted. And because Rebekah was omitted from all accounts, I think it is reasonable to believe that not only had Rebekah died long ago, but Scripture does not honor her for some reason. But what reason would that be? Well, the last bit of information we knew about Rebekah is that she favored Jacob over Esau and convinced Jacob to deceive his father / her husband Isaac in order to steal the blessing that rightfully belonged to her firstborn, Esau. Consequently, Rebekah might have been omitted because she was not honored. However, Scripture is silent on the matter and so that thought must remain as mere conjecture.

In summary, the sons of Israel disrespected and dishonored their earthly father, but Israel desired to revere and honor his Father in Heaven. And despite the dysfunction within Israel’s family, GOD still chose the Israelites to be His chosen people by which He will accomplish His ultimate plan for His creation. This chapter highlights how life here on this earth can seem to be falling apart, while all the divine pieces in the spiritual realm are falling into place. Even though everything seemed to be going wrong, GOD was causing all things to work together for good, for those who love Him, for those who are called according to His purpose (Romans 8:28).

  • In Genesis 35:2, Israel commanded his family to get rid of their idols. Unless we, also, get rid of the idols in our lives, they can divert our focus and ruin our relationship with the Lord. Sadly, many people proclaim belief in GOD while at the same time showcasing loyalty to idols. Many people acknowledge GOD without living rightly for GOD. Is that you? Do you claim GOD while living a life of idolatry? An idol is anything that replaces the One true GOD in priority and position. Idolatry extends beyond the worship of idols and images and false gods. Our modern idols are many and varied. Even for those who do not physically bow before a statue, idolatry is a matter of the heart — pride, self-centeredness, greed, gluttony, a love for possessions and ultimately rebellion against GOD in any act of unfaithfulness. Are you placing anything or anyone above GOD in priority and/or position? Money? Pornography? Drugs? Alcohol? A sports team or player? A singer or musician? A social media platform? Who or what is receiving your devotion at the time when you should be devoted to the Lord and His Word? Are you merely acknowledging GOD but not living for GOD according to His will?
  • In 35:10, GOD reminded Israel of his new identity – he is someone who will not let go of the Lord until he is blessed; he is someone who holds onto the Lord while the Lord showcases His power on Israel’s behalf. Although everything seemed to be falling apart, GOD reminds Israel that with the Lord everything will fall into place. This was a reminder that Israel needed to keep his eyes on the Lord and obey His commands despite what things might look like in the flesh while in this physical world. Many people wrongly believe that Christianity should enable a life free from problems while only being blessed. As a negative consequence to this wrong belief, many people become disillusioned and abandon The Way and walk away from the Lord, disheartened and disappointed. Instead, we need to learn from Israel and become determined not to let go of the Lord until we receive the Lord’s blessing. However, we typically do not ever receive the Lord’s blessing until we endure the storms of life and prevail in holding on to the Lord. Problems and difficulties in this life here on this earth are inevitable and unavoidable; therefore, we might as well view them as opportunities for growth. After all, how can we prevail unless we have a problem to prevail over? If GOD says He is El Shaddai – GOD Almighty – and that nothing is too difficult for Him (18:14), do you believe Him or not? Who’s your daddy? Is He a good Father, or not (Psalm 103:13)?

Chronological-012

Chronological Study (010/365)

Genesis 28:10 – 30:24


JACOB’S LADDER
(Genesis 28:10-22)

While Esau was attempting to gain his parents’ approval by marrying Ishmael’s daughter, Genesis 28:10-11 informs us that Jacob had left Beersheba and started his journey to Haran but eventually stopped to camp at some location when the sun went down. As Jacob slept, 28:12 says that in a dream, he saw a “ladder”. That word could be translated as such from Hebrew, but because it also means something that is raised up, it could also be translated as a “staircase”. In fact, given what we already know regarding the Tower of Babel being related to a ziggurat, and how the purpose of the ziggurat was to act as the connecting gate to GOD, I believe the raised up structure between Heaven and earth that Jacob witnessed was probably a staircase similar to a ziggurat. After all, the prideful people who attempted to get to Heaven via the Tower of Babel could not get to Heaven, and yet Jacob, who is sleeping flat on the ground, receives a vision from Heaven, showcasing how only the Lord is capable of making this connection. Regardless, this “ladder” or “staircase” stretched from the ground of the earth all the way to the heavens where the stars were seen. Jacob witnessed some angels descending from the heavens to earth and other angels ascending from the earth to the heavens. And 28:13 says that at the top stood the “Lord” יְהֹוָה [H3068] YHWH. And so man is unable to reach Heaven via their efforts of a tower or a stairway, but the Lord is able to come down to man. In 28:13-14, the Lord promises Jacob that the land belongs to him, his descendants will be as numerous as the dust of the earth, and that all families of the earth will be blessed through his descendants. If those promises sound familiar, it’s because all those promises to Jacob echo earlier promises the Lord gave to both Abraham and Isaac (12:2-3,7; 13:14-17; 17:7-8; 18:18; 22:17-18; 26:3-4).

Within the one verse of 28:15, the Lord states four promises in that the He is with Jacob, He will protect Jacob wherever he goes, He will bring Jacob back to the land he’s now on, and He will not leave Jacob until He has done what He has promised. When YHWH says, “I am with you”, it reminds me of what Jesus will later say to His disciples prior to His ascension in Heaven in Matthew 28:20 when He says, “I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” But why wouldn’t He be with His disciples just as He had been with Jacob? After all, Hebrews 13:8 says, “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.” In fact, in John 1:51, while Jesus speaks to Nathanael, He declares that He is the connection in this story with Jacob when He says, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you will see the heavens opened and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.” Therefore, this event with Jacob foreshadows how Jesus is the connection to Heaven and the only way to get to Heaven. And of course, for this reason, Jesus will later say in John 14:6, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.”

Now, when the Lord said He would bring Jacob back to the land, Jacob had no way of knowing that the Lord’s promise would not be fulfilled for another 20 years. However, the promise that the Lord would not leave Jacob until He had done what He promised is interesting because it seems to imply that at some point, the Lord’s favor or blessing will depart from Jacob after the Lord’s promises have been fulfilled. Well, I believe that moment will be seen later on in the great famine which will force Jacob to follow the Lord to Egypt, which we will see starting in Genesis 42.

The conclusion of Jacob’s vision jolted him awake, the fear of the Lord came upon him, he considered the location to be “awesome”, that it was the house of GOD, and the very gate of Heaven (28:16-17). So, what did Jacob do in response to his vision? In 28:18-22, rising early in the morning, Jacob took the stone that he used as a pillow, set it up as a pillar, and then poured oil on top of it, seemingly anointing the location. This action is interesting because this is the first time anyone has performed this anointing action with oil thus far in our chronological journey. So, how did Jacob learn to do this? Was he instructed to do this by Isaac or did he merely watch someone else do it and he is now copying that person’s behavior? This passage doesn’t say, but it seems to have been a Canaanite practice, which GOD will later prohibit in Deuteronomy 16:22: “You shall not set up for yourself a sacred pillar which the Lord your God hates.” Whatever the case may be, GOD will later clarify in great detail as to what to do and why to do certain things within the Mosaic Law. Noteworthy is the fact that while Jacob continues this practice during his stay in Paddan Aram (31:45,51-52) and after he returns to Canaan (35:14,20), following his next encounter with GOD at Peniel (32:22-32), he will construct altars (33:20; 35:1-7), just as Abraham (12:7-8; 13:4,18; 22:9) and Isaac (26:25) had done, with one of these altars being located at Bethel. This shift to making altars may indicate that Jacob undergoes a deep spiritual experience and a personal encounter of correction, but we don’t know for certain. Regardless, Jacob’s motive is pure and his intentions are good in that he truly wants to serve the Lord. The truth of the matter is that Jacob only knew what had been revealed to him, and because the Bible’s salvation story is a progressive revelation which culminates in Christ, Jacob truly did not know much by which the Lord would judge him.

After anointing the pillar with oil, Jacob called the name of the place Bethel, which means “house of God”, and then he made a vow to the Lord. But what is a vow? Vows are binding promises made to GOD while awaiting GOD’s help (Numbers 21:2; 1Samuel 1:11). When GOD’s answer comes, worshipers fulfill their vow by performing what they have promised (1Samuel 1:21; Acts 21:23-24). Later on, Mosaic regulations will address how and by whom vows are to be implemented (Leviticus 7:16; 22:17-25; 23:38; 27:2-11; Numbers 30; Deuteronomy 12:5-28). And since vows are intended to distinguish GOD’s faithful worshipers (Psalm 116:14,17-18), Scripture condemns rash or unfulfilled vows (Numbers 30:2; Deuteronomy 23:21-23; Proverbs 20:25; Ecclesiastes 5:5-6; Judges 11:30-39). But in this current story, Jacob makes a vow that if GOD does what He says, when Jacob returns in safety, “21 then the Lord will be my God. 22 This stone, which I have set up as a pillar, will be God’s house, and of all that You give me I will surely give a tenth to You” (Genesis 28:21-22). And so yet again, this practice of tithing to the Lord can be seen, and this practice will continue with the future generations of the Israelites. But if we pay attention to details, we will notice that Jacob says YHWH will be “my God”. Why is that significant? Because when Jacob was in the process of deceiving his father in 27:20, Isaac asked how the meal arrived to him so quickly, and Jacob said, “the Lord your God caused it to happen to me.” So, at first, Jacob referred to the Lord as Isaac’s GOD, but now that he encountered the Lord for himself, he promises that the Lord will be his GOD if the Lord brings him back in safety. It’s amazing what a personal encounter with the Lord can do for a person, isn’t it?

  • In 28:11, it is written that Jacob used a stone as a pillow for his head while sleeping in the wilderness. When was the last time you used a stone for a pillow or slept outside in the elements? I recall even as recent as last night how I woke up because I thought my pillow was lumpy and uncomfortable even though my pillow is soft and not hard like a stone. I also sleep on a soft bed, but Jacob slept on hard ground. I felt conviction in that moment while reading his story. But what about you? When was the last time you paused in your busy life to reflect on all the blessings you take for granted? Truly, how much do we possess that we simply don’t deserve? Are you truly grateful? Lord, thank You for my blessings that I truly don’t deserve.
  • Jacob used a stone as a pillow for his head. When a person is willing to use a stone as a pillow, that person is either harder than woodpecker lips or that person is obviously exhausted. But Jacob – not the outdoorsman (25:27) – fled for his life and ran from his mistakes. Running from your mistakes can lead you to feeling drained and in need of a reset. But what about you? Do you keep running from the mistakes in your life? Are you still running from your mistakes? Do you need to rest in the knowledge of GOD’s saving grace? Take notice of where Jacob rested. On The Rock. You may have mistakes in life, but when you decide to rest on the Rock (Christ Jesus), you’ll be ready for an encounter with the Lord. In fact, this is why Peter says in 1Peter 5:6-7, “Therefore humble yourselves under the mighty hand of God, that He may exalt you at the proper time, casting all your anxiety on Him, because He cares for you.” For this reason, Jesus will later say in John 15:5, “apart from Me you can do nothing.” So, are you ready to rest on the Rock?
  • In Jacob’s sleep, GOD gave him a personal encounter through a vision. Jacob’s response to this vision is interesting: he was afraid. Perhaps the best parallel to this situation is when Adam hid in the garden because he had been afraid due to the realization of sin in his life (Genesis 3:10). When Jacob woke up, he realized for the first time that he had always been asleep and unaware of the Lord’s presence in his life. And so it is with everyone else in life: we are all asleep until we wake up to the Truth of the Lord in our lives. It was not enough for him to be Abraham’s grandson or Isaac’s son; Jacob had to establish his own personal relationship with GOD (Matthew 3:9; Luke 3:8). It is not enough to hear wonderful stories about Christians in the world or even in your own family; you need to become part of the story yourself (Galatians 3:6-7). Are you asleep or are you awake? Where is the Lord right now?
  • In 28:15, when the Lord promised Jacob He would bring him back to the land he was on, Jacob didn’t realize that the Lord’s promise wouldn’t be fulfilled until about 20 years later. But what about you? Is there a promise you’re waiting on? How long has it been? How long are you willing to wait? What if GOD’s perfect timing requires you to wait a little longer?
  • In 28:16, Jacob started with a thought-provoking confession: “Surely the Lord is in this place, and I did not know it.” Why didn’t Jacob realize that the Lord was at that place? Did he consider that location to be too common? Did he believe that the ordinary couldn’t become extraordinary? But what about you? How many common or ordinary locations do you take for granted? Isn’t the Lord also at those locations? And if the Lord is there, how can it be common or ordinary? Wouldn’t that location be extraordinary? I don’t know about you, but the location that comes to my mind is my current place of employment. I often think of my job as being so common, ordinary, mundane, meaningless, and without purpose that this story filled me with conviction. I need to have the mindset while at work that the Lord is there and so that place cannot be ordinary. I should expect an encounter with the Lord no matter where I happen to be. But what about you? What place do you take for granted as being too common or ordinary for an encounter with the Lord?
  • In 28:18-19, Jacob took the stone — the hard and uncomfortable part of his life — and dedicated it to the Lord. What are the hard and uncomfortable parts in your life you need to dedicate to the Lord as you strive to know GOD better and grow closer in relationship with Him? Jacob dedicated the hard part of his life and called that place the “house of God”. Do you realize that the hardest parts of your life are where the best experiences of worship can be discovered?
  • In 28:21, due to his personal encounter with the Lord, Jacob vows that the Lord will become his GOD and no longer merely the GOD of his father. Do you remember your personal encounter and what changed your mind to proclaim the Lord as your GOD rather than merely the GOD of your parents? What was that encounter? What did you experience?

THE BIRTHING OLYMPICS
(Genesis 29:1 – 30:24)

In Genesis 29:1-2, Jacob, finally reaching the end of his journey “to the land of the sons of the east”, sees the same well that Abraham’s faithful servant Eliezer had seen many years ago (24:11). However, whereas Eliezer had prayed for guidance, Jacob does not. The description of “sons of the east” is an unusual way to refer to the inhabitants of Paddan Aram in northwest Mesopotamia. However, throughout the book of Genesis, the “east” is often associated with those who are expelled or move away from GOD’s presence (3:23-24; 4:16; 21:14; 25:6). Thus, this brief comment is a possible indicator that Jacob’s relatives do not worship the one true GOD (YHWH). In fact, we will later see that Laban does not (31:19).

In 29:4-8, seeing a large stone over the mouth of the well, and men with flocks of sheep and goats standing idly by the well, Jacob asks the men where they are from. After discovering they are from Haran, he asks them if they know “Laban the son of Nahor”. Now, this is interesting because Laban’s father is Bethuel and his grandfather is Nahor (24:24). And so yet again, Scripture passes over Bethuel for some reason unbeknownst to us (24:29,55). But after confirming that they did in fact know Laban and that he is doing well, they point out that his daughter Rachel is actually walking toward the well with sheep at that very moment. Jacob, noticing that it was still in the middle of the day, determined that it was not time for the livestock to be gathered and so he said, “Water the sheep, and go, pasture them.” But they responded, “We cannot, until all the flocks are gathered, and they roll the stone from the mouth of the well; then we water the sheep.”

Rachel then appears at the perfect time for Jacob just as Rebekah had appeared at the perfect time for Eliezer (24:15). But the fact that it was the middle of the day made this an unusual scenario because, as learned earlier in 24:11, evening time is when the women go out to draw water, not in the middle of the day. So, why was Rachel there? Why were the other men there? I don’t know, but they all had animals. Perhaps this was the time when animals were to receive water and later on in the evening is when the women will come to get water for households.

In 29:9-14, when Rachel arrived at the well, Jacob looked at her and Laban’s sheep with her (for Scripture states she was a shepherdess), and Jacob decided to roll the stone from the mouth of the well and then provide water for her flock. Thus, this is a role-reversal from the story of Rebekah. Whereas Rebekah had provided water for Eliezer’s camels (24:19-20), Jacob is now providing water for Rachel’s sheep. But didn’t the men nearby state that the stone couldn’t be removed until all flocks had gathered? So, why did Jacob move the stone and provide water for Rachel’s sheep? Perhaps with the arrival of Rachel, all flocks had gathered. Further, the men stated that the shepherd would move the stone. Perhaps Rachel (a shepherdess) had intended to move the stone yet Jacob moved it for her. Some commentators suggest that Jacob’s action might have been to show his strength and prove that he would be an asset to Laban’s family. Regardless, after watering her sheep, “Jacob kissed Rachel, and lifted his voice and wept” and told her that he was a relative of her father, and that he was Rebekah’s son. After hearing this, she ran and told Laban – just as Rebekah had done in 24:28-29. And just as it happened in the story of Rebekah, Laban came to investigate this time also. Laban then greeted Jacob and invited him to his house. Once in Laban’s home, “he related to Laban all these things”. Afterwards, Laban said to him, “Surely you are my bone and my flesh.” And then Jacob stayed with him for a month.

Now, I find 29:13-14 interesting because there seems to be two possible interpretations for these verses concerning the conversation between Laban and Jacob, and it’s possible that both could be true. The first interpretation is that when Scripture states Jacob “related to Laban all these things”, it could mean that Jacob merely shared the details of how he was related to Laban. However, the second interpretation could imply that Jacob told Laban the entire story as to why he was there, just as Eliezer had done when he visited (24:33-49). But if Jacob explained his entire story, then Laban’s response of “Surely you are my bone and my flesh” might mean more than the mere recognition of being related; rather, Laban could have implied that because Jacob was a man determined to be blessed by any means, then Laban saw a lot of himself in Jacob and he gave Jacob his approval. However, because Scripture does not state as much, it’s best not to read into the text what isn’t clearly stated unless other evidence proves the point and that point provides reason for something that happens within the main storyline. In this case, both interpretations could be true and they don’t affect the main story either way.

In 29:15, Laban says to Jacob, “Because you are my relative, should you therefore serve me for nothing? Tell me, what shall your wages be?” Now, keep in mind that 29:14 informed us that Jacob had stayed with Laban and served him for an entire month before Laban spoke those words to Jacob. So, Laban had already used Jacob for labor for an entire month without compensating him for his labor. In an alpha male dominant display of power, Laban took advantage of Jacob’s desperate situation and treated him as if he were a servant, apparently only providing him with the food he needed to live. So, why did Jacob endure such treatment for an entire month? Well, not only had Rebekah not yet sent for him to return home (27:45), but 29:16-18 informs us that Jacob became infatuated with Laban’s younger daughter, Rachel, and desired to have her as his wife. Thus, Laban and Jacob had both been scheming as to how to receive a blessing. However, because of Jacob’s Aperture Appetite for Rachel, he didn’t notice Laban’s deception in the blurred background.

In 29:17, Scripture informs us that “Leah’s eyes were weak, but Rachel was beautiful of form and face.” The word “weak” is the Hebrew word רַךְ [H7390] raḵ (rak), which means tender, soft, delicate, weak, or frail, and has the implications elsewhere in Scripture of being timid, fearful, or fainthearted. Though the description is brief, it seems to imply that Jacob found Rachel to be more attractive in both form and face. Some people have misinterpreted this verse to mean that Leah had a lazy eye, but the Hebrew doesn’t state this to be the case.

In 29:18, responding to Laban, Jacob presented an offer to work for him seven years to be able to marry Rachel. But why did he offer to serve for seven years? That’s a long time. Well, as we learned earlier in our chronological study, a bride price was paid by the groom to the family of the bride as surety that the marriage would take place. However, Jacob didn’t own anything and so he had nothing to offer except his labor. In 29:19, Laban agreed. And then 29:20 says, “So Jacob served seven years for Rachel and they seemed to him but a few days because of his love for her.”

However, when the time had come for Jacob to receive Rachel as his wife, Laban prepared a feast during the day (29:22), waited until evening, and then sneaked Leah into Jacob’s place under the cover of darkness, and Jacob consummated the marriage with her (29:23). And because this occurred after an entire day of feasting, it might be possible that Jacob had been somewhat inebriated, though Scripture doesn’t state that to be the case. Unfortunately, Jacob didn’t discover that he had taken Leah as his wife until the next morning. Angry, he asked Laban why he deceived him (29:25). Thus, Jacob had once been the deceiver and now he has been deceived. In 29:26, Laban told Jacob that it was not their custom for the younger to be given in marriage before the firstborn, as if to imply that Jacob should have known this and Laban is free of any guilt. Thus, Jacob’s deception won him the blessing of the firstborn birthright, yet now he has been deceived by Leah, who is the firstborn. In 29:27, Laban told Jacob that he would be willing to also give Rachel to him as his wife after Leah’s one-week marriage celebration if he agreed to work another seven years for him. Jacob reluctantly agreed and then 29:30 says, “Jacob went in to Rachel also, and indeed he loved Rachel more than Leah.”

Now, I find it interesting that at this point in the story, it has been a little over seven years since Jacob arrived at Laban’s home and yet Rebekah has still not sent for Jacob to return. Why not? Is Esau still so angry that Rebekah cannot send for Jacob to return? Is Rebekah even alive or has she died by this point? Did she send a messenger and yet the messenger somehow died and never arrived? Did Laban receive the message yet refuse to share it with Jacob? And what about Isaac? Why didn’t he ever send for Jacob? Scripture is silent. We don’t know.

In 29:31, the Lord saw that Leah was unloved and so He enabled her to become pregnant, yet Rachel remained barren. This reminds me of when the Lord saw that Hagar had been unloved (16:7-11). Clearly, the Lord is the One who sees the unloved. And Rachel being barren reminds me of when both Sarah (11:30) and Rebekah (25:20) had been barren. Clearly, the Lord is the One who gives life in His perfect timing.

In 29:32, Leah gave birth to a son and named him Reuben (reh-oo-bane’), for she said, “Because the Lord has seen my affliction; surely now my husband will love me.” The name Reuben means “Look! A son!” But it also sounds like the Hebrew for “He has seen my misery.” However, Leah confesses in this statement that she believes Jacob will now love her because she gave birth to his firstborn, and the firstborn is a son.

In 29:33, Leah gave birth to another son, naming him Simeon (shim-own’), saying, “Because the Lord has heard that I am unloved, He has therefore given me this son also.” The name Simeon means “He heard.” In this statement, Leah confesses that Jacob’s love for her did not change and grow greater after she gave birth to Reuben and GOD heard that she is still unloved.

In 29:34, Leah gave birth to another son, naming him Levi (lay-vee’), saying, “Now this time my husband will become attached to me, because I have borne him three sons.” The name Levi means “being attached” or “joined to” something/someone. And so yet again, Leah has hope that because she has now given Jacob three sons, he will realize that his love for her should be greater than his love for Rachel.

In 29:35, after giving birth to her fourth son, Leah said, “This time I will praise the Lord”, and she named him Judah (yeh-hoo-daw’). The name Judah is similar to the Hebrew term for “praise”. And so finally, Leah turns her attention from Jacob to the Lord, no longer declaring that giving birth to a son will make Jacob love her more than he loves Rachel. Now, noteworthy is the fact that our Lord and Savior Jesus will come from the line of Judah (Genesis 49:9-10; Isaiah 11:1; Micah 5:2; Luke 3:33; Hebrews 7:14; Revelation 5:5). And so the moment Leah chose to praise the Lord, the Lord chose that line to be the one from whom He would come because only praise is appropriate for Him. Leah felt unloved and yet the Lord chose her to the be the divine line from whom Christ would come. So, was she loved? Yes. More than she even realized!

In Genesis 30:1-4, Rachel becomes envious of Leah, demands Jacob to give her children, and then he becomes angry with her, telling her he is not GOD and has no control over her womb. Noteworthy is the fact that unlike Isaac who prayed for his barren wife (25:21), Jacob does not pray for his barren wife. In response, Rachel tells Jacob to have sexual relations with her servant, Bilhah, so that through her she may have children. But would the baby truly be her child or would the baby be Bilhah’s child? Well, repeating the mistake Abraham and Sarah made with Hagar (16:1-2), Jacob and Rachel now do the same thing with Bilhah. In 30:6, after Bilhah gave birth to a son, Rachel said, “God has vindicated me, and has indeed heard my voice and has given me a son.” Therefore, Rachel named the son Dan (dawn), which means “he judged”. In 30:7-8, Bilhah gives birth to a second son and then Rachel says, “With mighty wrestlings I have wrestled with my sister, and I have indeed prevailed.” Therefore, Rachel named the son Naphtali (naf-taw-lee’), which means “wrestle” or “struggle”.

Now, I find it interesting that Rachel declares to have prevailed over her sister in a wrestling match, as if giving birth to children was an Olympic sporting event to be won. But even if it had been some type of sporting event, the scorecard would say that Leah has four points, Bilhah has two points, and Rachel still has zero points. But why was Rachel envious of Leah anyway if Jacob loved her more than Leah and Leah was unloved? And why did Jacob allow this wrestling event to go on between the sisters?

In 30:9-13, Leah, accepting the challenge of this childbearing ‘sporting’ competition, continues to wrestle against her sister. However, no longer getting pregnant herself, Leah gives her servant, Zilpah, to Jacob as a “wife”. Zilpah gave birth to a son, and then Leah said, “How fortunate!” Therefore, Leah named him Gad (gawd), which has a meaning that implies being overcome by troops and receiving good fortune through distribution. So, in other words, Leah declared that she was adding to her troops and to her good fortune via Zilpah’s contribution. Later, Zilpah gave birth to a second son and Leah said, “Happy am I! For women will call me happy.” Therefore, Leah named him Asher (ah-sheer’), which means “happy”. But was Leah truly happy or was she merely bragging, hoping to hurt Rachel?

In 30:14-17, after an unknown amount of time passed, Reuben finds mandrakes during the wheat harvest and brings them to Leah. Rachel then asks politely if she could have some of Reuben’s mandrakes, however, Leah, filled with resentment toward her sister, says, “Is it a small matter for you to take my husband? And would you take my son’s mandrakes also?” (Obviously, Leah was not happy.) In response, Rachel presents Leah with a proposition that if she can have the mandrakes, then Leah can sleep with Jacob that very night. Leah agrees, later informs Jacob of the trade, and Jacob complies. And because of that night, Leah conceived and gave birth to a fifth son.

So, Leah claimed that Rachel stole Jacob from her even though the truth of the matter is that it was Leah’s and Laban’s deception that stole Jacob away from Rachel (29:23-27). Leah got angry at Rachel and claimed that Rachel wanted to steal her son’s mandrakes even though the truth of the matter is that Leah later steals the mandrakes from her son so she can sleep with Jacob that night. And Rachel’s Aperture Appetite for the mandrakes causes her to trade Jacob for some food, which seems to be a similar situation we witnessed with Esau’s Aperture Appetite when he traded his birthright for some red stew (25:32-34). Thus, Rachel traded a potential blessing of conceiving that night for some food and then Leah received the blessing of conception, which Rachel despised.

In 30:18, Leah said, “God has given me my wages because I gave my maid to my husband.” Therefore, she named the son Issachar (yis-sahs-kawr’), which means “he will bring a reward” or “there is recompense”. But did GOD truly bless Leah because she had given her servant to sleep with Jacob? No. In 30:17, it is written, “God gave heed to Leah”. So, the Lord’s decision to bless Leah with conception was directly related to her desire to be with Jacob and to be loved – it had nothing to do with Leah allowing Zilpah to sleep with Jacob.

In 30:19-20, Leah gave birth to her sixth son and said, “God has endowed me with a good gift; now my husband will dwell with me, because I have borne him six sons.” Therefore, Leah named her son Zebulun (zeb-oo-loon’), which means “honor” or “exalted”, but it originates from the word meaning to “dwell with me”. Sadly, by Leah giving her son this name, she once again believes that she will be honored by Jacob and that he will choose to dwell with her and love her more than he loves Rachel. From Leah’s perspective, knowing that she is also counting the children who come from the servants, she has given Jacob eight sons whereas Rachel has only given Jacob two sons, both of which were from her servant Bilhah. So, Leah essentially thinks, “How could I not be the clear winner of this competition against my sister? Certainly, Jacob will finally realize that I am the blessed and favored wife and he will finally love me more than he loves Rachel.”

Interestingly, 30:21 says, “Afterward she bore a daughter and named her Dinah” (dee-naw’). But if genealogy is counted and determined by the males, why mention this? Because it’s going to become important in chapter 34.

It is written in 30:22-24, “22 Then God remembered Rachel, and God gave heed to her and opened her womb. 23 So she conceived and bore a son and said, ‘God has taken away my reproach.’ 24 She named him Joseph, saying, ‘May the Lord give me another son.’ ”

The name Joseph (yo-safe’) is the future tense of “increase” or “add” and means, “YHWH shall add”. Essentially, Rachel said, “The Lord did this and the Lord will do it again.” Therefore, Joseph, born in GOD’s perfect timing, is the product of GOD’s love and faithfulness. Rachel was not forgotten just as Leah was not unloved. Therefore, both Leah and Rachel were wrong in their beliefs because GOD remembered Rachel and Leah was loved.

Now, if this story were to be summarized as if a sports announcer was commentating on a baseball game, the sportscaster might say something like this: “Well, here in the bottom of the ninth inning, Rachel just smashed a home run; however, Leah is still dominating the game with the score of 8-3. Rachel might have some good momentum right now, but if she’s going to pull off a major comeback, she’s going to need to score six more points. I hate to be a Debbie-downer, but unless a miracle happens, I think Rachel is going to be knocked out of the bracket soon.”

Now, that is the way Leah and Rachel viewed this story, but GOD did not see it as a sporting competition. In fact, envy never should have existed between Leah and Rachel, but that conflict was merely a natural consequence of choosing to live apart from GOD’s design of marriage as one male and one female for one lifetime. And because of Jacob’s disregard for GOD’s design of marriage, Jacob currently has four wives and children from each one of those women. However, Jacob only has one son from Rachel (whom he loves the most [29:30]). Consequently, Scripture is setting the stage for further conflict which will inevitably arise due to favoritism.

LEAH ZILPAH RACHEL BILHAH
Reuben (01) Gad (07) Joseph (11) Dan (05)
Simeon (02) Asher (08) Naphtali (06)
Levi (03)
Judah (04)
Issachar (09)
Zebulun (10)
[Dinah]
  • Jacob deceiving his brother and father, and listening to his mother’s misguided words had never been GOD’s plan, but GOD created good from the bad Jacob chose to do in order to create a new plan and fulfill His ultimate plan. Take comfort in knowing that your bad choices don’t have to be the end of your story — GOD can and will create good from the bad if you dedicate your life to His will. So, what bad decision did you make in your past that you now regret and pray for GOD to use in a better plan for your future? Do you trust in the Lord?
  • Mistakes often take time to correct. A 1990’s advertisement said, “Do the crime, do the time.” Jacob’s bad decisions caused him to serve Laban for 14 years just so he could marry Rachel. If you’ve made mistakes in your life, it’s reasonable to expect that it will take some time to make right the wrongs. Making a big mistake is similar to knocking over a domino. Sometimes, we’re able to prevent all the dominoes from falling, but sometimes all of them fall. Either way, it takes time to rebuild all that has fallen because of one mistake. But in this process of rebuilding, GOD was helping Jacob to build what he never would have otherwise been able to build by his own efforts. But what about you? Can you recall a time when everything seemed to fall apart only to discover that it was GOD’s plan and everything was actually falling into place?
  • For seven years, Jacob worked hard for a woman he was not allowed to be intimate with [physically]. Yet it is written that his love for her was such that the seven years seemed to him but a few days. Are you committed enough to endure seven years for someone you love? What do you think the conversations between Jacob and Rachel were like during those seven years?
  • Laban benefited financially by using Jacob, but he never benefited spiritually. What good will that do? Jesus will later say in Mark 8:36, “For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world, and forfeit his soul?”
  • Jacob waited 7 years for Rachel, but worked a total of 14 years just to have Rachel as his wife. Most marriages nowadays don’t even last 14 years, but Jacob worked for 14 years just to be married. Many males wouldn’t be willing to work 14 minutes for a woman, let alone 14 years. Actually, allow me to rephrase that: Many men would never be willing to work 14 minutes to earn their places in the privileged place of women’s hearts; however, many men would work countless hours to cheat their way into women’s vaginas. What are you willing to do in the name of love? Not lust. Love. There’s a big difference.
  • If you are married, did you work hard for the one you wanted to marry and then stopped working for the one you married? Who is more important and sacred? The one you want to marry but have not yet married? Or the one you have married? So, who should be treated as being more important and sacred? If you do not treat the one you are married to better than you treated that person prior to marriage, you’re living against the design.
  • Do you have a girlfriend/boyfriend or husband/wife? How much effort did you put forth to earn entrance into that person’s heart? Were you truly grateful to have been invited into such a personal and private place? How much time has passed since you were granted access into the private sanctum of his/her heart? How much effort do you put forth now in comparison to how much effort you put forth when you were first given access into his/her innermost being? Do you take your access for granted? Are you aware that, if at any time you are no longer welcome there, you would be guilty of trespassing? Are you aware that you are not entitled to be there? Do you understand that it is a privilege and an honor to be there? Act accordingly. When was the last time you thanked your partner for granting you access into the most important area of his/her life? The lesson to be learned here is that love is worth the sacrifice. After all, GOD loved you enough to willingly sacrifice Himself just so you could be with Him (John 3:16-17).
  • Ishmael/Isaac and Jacob/Esau taught us that favoritism in children create identity crises. But through Leah and Rachel, GOD reveals to us that having more than one spouse also leads to envious, sad, and bitter consequences. But these consequences are not limited to the spouses; they affect the children as well. In fact, the worst fighting and rivalry will occur between Leah’s children and Rachel’s children, and among the tribes who will descend from them. And all this trouble comes into being because Laban put his daughter, Leah, in a horrible position: he forced Leah upon a man who neither wanted her nor loved her. And the Lord saw that Leah was unloved. Leah, like Ishmael, was put in a position in life she didn’t have much control over. But Leah, like Ishmael, also allowed herself to become part of the problem rather than the solution and she allowed the situation to create an identity crisis. If she wasn’t the favorite and most loved wife of Jacob, then who was she? If she was the throwaway daughter and no one’s desired prize, then who was she? But what about you? Who are you? Do you know who you are?
  • Leah felt unloved and so she tried to earn Jacob’s love by having children with him. But what about you? In what ways do you try to earn love from those who simply don’t love you? Do your attempts work? Does it bring satisfaction and fulfillment or does it eventually leave you empty once again? Do you truly understand that love is not something that you need to earn but it is something that is freely given to you even though you didn’t earn it?
  • GOD’s timing had to be perfect for Rachel to give birth to Joseph. Can you trust GOD when nothing seems to be happening? Are you able to be content with what you have while patiently waiting for whatever GOD has prepared for you?
  • Sin seduced siblings and a rivalry reduced relationship to a race to reproduce. Understand this: competition and comparison comes from the conniving counterfeiter. But what about you? Are you comparing yourself to anyone? Are you competing against someone? If you are, do you think that’s what GOD desires for you?
  • Jacob would have been wise to reject the servants of Leah and Rachel, even though this was an accepted custom in the ancient Near East. Can you think of anything in your current culture that society has deemed to be acceptable even though GOD declares it to be wrong?
  • If our society states that what is wrong is right and what is against GOD’s design is to be accepted, would you do those things? If the sin that would bring you pleasure would become legal and accepted by society, would you indulge in that sin simply because there would be no consequence from society? Or would you act according to GOD’s will? How important is it to know GOD’s will?

Chronological-010

Picture Scripture: “Jesus Is GOD” (John 10:30)

(John 10:30)
“I and the Father are one.”

…———…

Our understanding of who Jesus was/is must correspond to Jesus’s own self-understanding. When Jesus said, “I and the Father are one,” the word “one” is the English translation of the Greek word heis, which means a single one in contrast to many, to the exclusion of others. But the specific spelling of this adjective as used in John 10:30 is hen, which is the neuter (common) spelling, denoting neither masculine nor feminine. The verb preceding the number one is eimi, which is the basic Greek verb which expresses being and means “I am” or “I exist.” But the specific spelling of this verb as used in John 10:30 is esmen, which is the first person plural indicative of eimi, and it means “we are.” Therefore, Jesus claimed to exist in unity with the Father and claimed to be the great I AM. And though the use of hen is a small and often overlooked detail, I believe it is also important because GOD is neither male nor female, but is Spirit (John 4:24). Also, eimi, being in the present tense, indicative mood – can be time-inclusive (“omnitemporal,” like the Hebrew imperfect tense). Only the context indicates whether the present tense also has “timeless” implications. For example, in John 14:6, Jesus said, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.” Here, eimi naturally accords with the fact that Christ is eternal – meaning “I am (was, will be).” For this reason it is written in Hebrews 13:8, “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.” Moreover, the “I am”(egō eimi) of John 14:6 links with GOD’s only name, YHWH, meaning “He who always was, is, and will be.”

So, did Jesus ever claim to be GOD? Yes. Consider all that follows. In Exodus 3:14, GOD revealed Himself to Moses as “I AM WHO I AM.” The name, YHWH, refers only to the one true GOD. Exodus 20:5 tells us that no other person or thing was to be worshipped or served. In Isaiah 44:6, it is written, “I am the first and I am the last; there is no God but Me.” The great “I AM” can be seen in Isaiah 41:4; 43:10-11,13; 46:9; 48:12; 52:6; and even Jeremiah 29:23.

This Gospel of John especially makes it clear who Jesus was and still is: Jesus is the great “I AM” (John 4:26; 6:20,35; 8:12,16,19,23-24,28,58; 10:7,9,11,14; 11:25; 13:19; 14:6; 15:1,5) and “I AM” is GOD (Exodus 3:14); therefore, Jesus is GOD and GOD reveals Himself in Jesus (John 1:14; 8:19; 10:30; 14:7-11).

Isaiah 42:8 says, “I am the Lord, that is My name; I will not give My glory to another, nor My praise to graven images”

Mark 14:61-62 says, “Again the high priest was questioning Him, and saying to Him, ‘Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?’ And Jesus said, ‘I am; and you shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.’ ”

Now that question may be drawn from Jesus’s public teaching in the Temple (Mark 12:1-12,35-37; cf. 3:5-11; Luke 4:16-30), in which He claimed to be the Son of the GOD of Israel and the Messianic Lord of David, who shares exclusive honor with GOD Himself. “I am.” Jesus answered affirmatively and then applied to Himself messianic prophecies from Psalm 110:1 (cf. Mark 12:35-37) and Daniel 7:13-14. And this is why in Mark 14:63-64 the high priest charged Him with blasphemy and they condemned Him to death.

John 8:58 says, “Jesus said to them, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am.’ ”

John 10:30 says, “I and the Father are one.”

John 10:38 says, “the Father is in Me, and I in the Father.”

John 17:5 says, “Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was.”

In Revelation 1:17-18 Jesus said, “I am the first and the last, and the living One; and I was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore”

Psalm 23:1 says, “The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want.”

In John 10:11, Jesus said, “I am the good shepherd.”

Joel 3:12 says, “For there I will sit to judge all the surrounding nations.”

In Matthew 25:31-46 and John 5:24-30, Jesus claimed to be the Judge of all people.

In Isaiah 62:5; the entire book of Hosea, but specifically Hosea 2:16, YHWH is the ‘Bridegroom.’

Jesus is the ‘Bridegroom’ (Matthew 9:15; 25:1; Mark 2:19-20; Luke 5:34-35; John 3:29; Ephesians 5:22-33; Revelation 19:7; 21:2,9; 22:17).

Psalm 27:1 says, “The Lord is my light and my salvation.”

John 8:12 says, “Then Jesus again spoke to them, saying, ‘I am the Light of the world; he who follows Me will not walk in the darkness, but will have the Light of life.’ ”

YHWH is the giver or life (Deuteronomy 32:39; 1Samuel 2:6) and YHWH is the only Judge (Deuteronomy 32:35; Joel 3:12).

Jesus raises the dead and is Judge (John 5:21-30).

No one should worship anyone other than GOD (Exodus 20:1-4); Deuteronomy 5:6-9; 6:13; Matthew 4:10; Acts 10:25-26; 14:11-15; Revelation 19:10; 22:8-9).

Jesus accepted worship (Matthew 8:2; 9:18; 14:33; 15:25; 16:17; 20:20; 28:17; Mark 5:6; John 20:28-29).

Isaiah 43:25 says, “I, even I, am the one who wipes out your transgressions for My own sake, and I will not remember your sins.”

Jesus had the authority to forgive sins (Mark 2: 5-12). It is for this reason, the Jews charged Him with blasphemy, which is punishable by death (Leviticus 24:10-23; Numbers 15:30-31).

John 3:12 says, “If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?”

In The Message, Eugene Peterson paraphrases it this way: “If I tell you things that are plain as the hand before your face and you don’t believe me, what use is there in telling you of things you can’t see, the things of God?”

H.A.N.D.S.

Jesus gets GOD’s Honors
Jesus has GOD’s Attributes
Jesus has GOD’s Names
Jesus does GOD’s Deeds
Jesus sits in GOD’s Seat

Honors: Jesus expected people to honor Him as they did the Father (John 5:23; Luke 10:16; 1John 2:23); He accepted worship from His disciples (Matthew 14:33; 28:9,17; Luke 24:52); He encouraged them to have faith in Him as they did in YHWH (Matthew 18:5,20; John 14:1); He invited them to pray to Him (John 14:14).

Attributes: Jesus claimed to be just like GOD the Father — so much so that if you saw Jesus you had seen the Father (John 14:7-11); Jesus revealed Himself to be omnipresent when He asserted that He would be present with His disciples wherever they gathered in His name (Matthew 18:20); Jesus even said that He had existed before creation (John 17:5).

Names: Jesus was equal with the Father (Matthew 11:27; John 5:17-18); Jesus’s “I am” statements echoed the way GOD identified Himself in the Old Testament (compare Isaiah 43:10 with John 8:24,28,58); Jesus’s title for Himself, “the Son of Man,” refers to prophetic visions of a divine yet human figure (Ezekiel 1:26-28; Daniel 7:13-14); Jesus accepted Thomas and did not rebuke him when he called Jesus “My Lord and my God” (John 20:28).

Deeds: Jesus did many deeds and claimed to have done many deeds that only GOD could do. He calmed a raging storm with a mere word, walked on water, and fed thousands of people with one boy’s lunch (Matthew 8:23-27; 14:13-33); Jesus claimed the right to forgive people of all their sins (Matthew 9:1-8; Mark 2:1-12); Jesus said that He would raise the dead (John 5:28-29; 11:25-26) and be the final Judge of all humanity (Matthew 25:31-46; John 5:22-23). And whenever Jesus gave commands, He did not say “Thus says the Lord” like prophets did; rather, Jesus, having the authority of GOD, said, “I say to you” (Matthew 5:18-44; 10:15; 12:6; 13:17; 18:3; Mark 10:15; 14:30; Luke 5:24; 7:14,47; 12:8; 23:43; John 3:3; 5:24-25; 6:53; 8:51). It is for this reason it is written that Jesus taught as One having authority (Mark 1:22,27). And it was Jesus Himself who gave His disciples authority over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal every kind of disease and every kind of sickness (Matthew 10:1).

Seat: Jesus claimed that He would sit on the seat of GOD’s own throne, the place from which GOD rules over His entire creation (Matthew 25:31; Mark 12:36; Luke 20:42-43). And that is exactly what Jesus will do there: He will rule over absolutely everything in creation (Matthew 11:25-27; 28:18; Luke 10:21-22).

Summary:

The religious people who rejected Jesus understood that He claimed to be equal to GOD (Mark 2:7; John 5:17-18; 10:27-33) and that is exactly why they desired to kill Him. Jesus most certainly did claim to be GOD, but is there good reason to believe His claim? Absolutely. Yes. To support His claim to deity, Jesus showed supernatural power and authority that are unique in human history. The fulfilled prophecies, historical records, the virgin birth, and sinless life are all in favor of the deity of Christ. His disciples had lived and worked with Him for three years in close proximity, yet their opinions of Him were not diminished. Beyond the moral aspects of His life, the miraculous nature of His ministry is a divine confirmation. Jesus performed an unprecedented display of miracles (Matthew 11:4-5). This special outpouring of miracles was a special sign that the Messiah had come (Isaiah 35:5-6). And of course, let’s not forget the resurrection. Nothing like the resurrection of Christ is claimed by any other religion, and no other miracle has as much historical confirmation.

Jesus thought it was fundamentally important what others believed about Him. It was not a subject that allowed for neutrality or a less-than-honest appraisal of the evidence. I believe C. S. Lewis captured this truth best in his book, Mere Christianity. After surveying some of the evidence regarding Jesus’s identity, Lewis wrote:

“I am trying to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: ‘I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept His claim to be God.’ That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic – on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg – or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronising nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.”

Some people believe Jesus is GOD because they believe the Bible is the inspired Word of GOD, which teaches that Jesus is GOD. I, too, believe the Bible is the wholly inspired Word of GOD; however, I do not think one needs to hold that belief in order to conclude that Jesus is GOD. If the New Testament books are historically accurate and reliable — so reliable, in fact, that Jesus cannot be dismissed as a mere legend; if the gospel accounts preserve an accurate record of the things He did, the places He visited, and the words He spoke; if Jesus made firm claims to be GOD, then every person must answer the question, “Is Jesus’s claim to deity true or false?” This question deserves serious consideration because the answer will determine our identity and purpose.

There are only two alternatives with four options to which we can respond. The two alternatives to Jesus’s claim to be GOD is that either His claim was true or false. If false, He either knew His claims were false or He did not know His claims were false. If He knew His claims were false, then He made a deliberate misrepresentation, He was a liar, hypocrite, demonic, and a fool who died for being a lying fool. If He did not know His claims were false, He was sincerely deluded and a lunatic. However, if His claims are true, Jesus is GOD and we can either accept it or reject it.

Was Jesus A Liar?

Homicide detectives often list three types of motives at the heart of any misbehavior: (1) financial greed, (2) sexual or relational desire, and (3) pursuit of power. Therefore, we must examine the evidence:

Financial Greed: Jesus is never described as a man who possessed financial wealth. He taught His disciples to give their possessions to the needy and not to store up treasure in this life, but to store up spiritual treasure in the life to come (Luke 12:32-34). He also told the rich young ruler the same (Matthew 19:21). Jesus gained nothing financially from His preaching, teaching, or healing ministry.

Sexual / Relational Desire: No evidence suggests that Jesus was motivated by lust or relationships. Many women followed Jesus (Luke 8:2-3). By all accounts, however, He showed them the highest respect, even in ways that were countercultural at that time (John 4:1-45; Luke 8:42-48).

Pursuit of Power: It is utterly unreasonable to assert that Jesus lied about His identity in order to gain power. Rather than gaining power for Himself, He modeled serving others (John 13:1-16; 15:13) and giving without expectation of return, even to the wicked and ungrateful (Luke 6:35-36); and He taught His disciples to do the same. In a dispute over who would be the greatest in the Kingdom, Jesus taught His disciples that the greatest is the one who serves (Luke 22:24-27). Moreover, Jesus relinquished His power (Matthew 26:52-53) and emptied Himself, willingly sacrificing Himself to save everyone (Philippians 2:5-8).

Was Jesus A Lunatic?

Jesus has in abundance qualities that liars and lunatics most conspicuously lack: His practical wisdom and ability to read human hearts and minds; His deep love and compassion; His calm and collected manner; His ability to astonish, His unpredictability, and His creativity. No lunatic could have been the Source of such perceptive, innovative, and effective psychological insight while being completely selfless.

Is Jesus Lord?

If Jesus is neither a liar nor a lunatic, He must be Lord! Even His disciples believed Him to be so (Matthew 16:16; Mark 1:1; John 11:27; 20:28; Hebrews 1:3)!

In Matthew 7:21-23, Jesus warned His disciples [and us] that not everyone who calls Jesus Lord will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. For those who do not do the will of the Father, Jesus will say, “I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.”

Jesus exposed the people who sounded religious yet had no personal relationship with Him. On “Judgment Day,” only our relationship with Christ — our faith in Him as Savior and our obedience to His Word — will matter. In John 8:19, Jesus said to the Pharisees, “if you knew Me, you would know My Father also.”

Do you only know of Jesus or do you truly know Him? Would you acknowledge Him before all people? Remember what is written:

Matthew 10:32-33 says, “Therefore everyone who confesses Me before men, I will also confess him before My Father who is in heaven. But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven.”

In Matthew 16:15-17, Jesus said to His disciples, “ ‘But who do you say that I am?’ Simon Peter answered, ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ And Jesus said to him, ‘Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.’ ”

But… Son of Man? Son of God?

Perceived Problem:
Jesus referred to Himself most often as the Son of Man. An example of this is seen in
Matthew 20:18 when Jesus told His disciples “the Son of Man will be delivered to the chief priests and scribes, and they will condemn Him to death.” But this seems to point to His humanity more than His deity. He was a human, a mere man who died like everyone else in history. If He was really the Messiah, the Son of GOD, why did He use the self-description, “Son of Man”?

Scriptural Solutions:
First of all, even if the phrase “Son of Man” is a reference to Jesus’s humanity, it is not a denial of His deity. By becoming man, Jesus did not cease being GOD. The Incarnation of Christ did not involve subtraction of deity, but the addition of humanity. Jesus clearly claimed to be GOD on many occasions (
Matthew 16:16-17; John 8:58; 10:30). But, in addition to being divine, He was also human. He had two natures conjoined in one person.

Furthermore, Jesus was not denying His deity by referring to Himself as the Son of Man. The term “Son of Man” is used to describe Christ’s deity as well. The Bible says that only GOD can forgive sins (Isaiah 43:25; Mark 2:7). But, as the “Son of Man,” Jesus had the power to forgive sins (Mark 2:10). Likewise, Christ will return to earth as the “Son of Man” in clouds of glory to reign on earth (Matthew 24:30; 26:63-64). In Matthew 26:63-64, Jesus is citing Daniel 7:13 where the Messiah is described as the “Ancient of Days,” a phrase used to indicate His deity (cf. Daniel 7:9). Jesus’s title for Himself, “the Son of Man,” refers to prophetic visions of a divine yet human figure (Ezekiel 1:26-28; Daniel 7:13-14).

Further, when Jesus was asked by the high priest whether He was the “Son of God”, He responded affirmatively, declaring that He was the “Son of Man” who would come in power and great glory. This indicated that Jesus Himself used the phrase “Son of Man” to indicate His deity as the Son of GOD.

Finally, the phrase “Son of Man” emphasizes who Jesus is in relation to His Incarnation and His work of salvation. In the Old Testament (Leviticus 25:25-26,48-49; Ruth 2:20), the kinsman redeemer was a close relative of someone who was in need of redemption. So Jesus, as our Kinsman Redeemer, was identifying Himself with humankind as its Savior and Redeemer. Those who knew the Old Testament truth about Messiah being the Son of Man understood Jesus’s implicit claims to deity. Those who did not, would not so recognize this. Jesus often said things in this way so as to test His audience and separate believers from unbelievers (Matthew 13:10-17). But many Jews did understand much of what Jesus said and they plotted to kill Him because Jesus made Himself equal with GOD (John 5:18; 10:30).

Those who don’t believe the deity of Jesus typically point to the phrase, “Son of God” or “Son of Man” and determine that Jesus was literally the son of GOD in the same way a human could be a son to a human father. But the Bible does not teach henotheism such as Hermes being a son of Zeus in Greek mythology. GOD came into this world via the miraculous virgin birth; this is the incarnation. Jesus is GOD made manifest into human form (Matthew 1:23; John 1:1,14). Jesus existed before the world (John 1:1; 8:58; 17:5,24; Colossians 1:15-18), is the Word that spoke everything into existence, and the Word became flesh. Ponder: Judas was described as being the “son of destruction (John 17:12). But this does not mean that a being named “Destruction” had a son named Judas. No — both Son of Man and Son of God were titles. And this is why we simply cannot take the Bible literally at all times in all areas; rather, we must use logic to reason, the Holy Spirit for revelation, and the Body for confirmation.

Worship Only GOD:

Matthew 14:33 says, “And those who were in the boat worshiped Him, saying, ‘You are certainly God’s Son!’ ”

Matthew 28:9 says, “And behold, Jesus met them and greeted them. And they came up and took hold of His feet and worshiped Him.”

Matthew 28:17 says, “When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful.”

Luke 24:51-53 says, “51 While He was blessing them, He parted from them and was carried up into heaven. 52 And they, after worshiping Him, returned to Jerusalem with great joy, 53 and were continually in the temple praising God.”

John 9:38 says, “And he said, “Lord, I believe.” And he worshiped Him.”

John 20:28 says, “Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!””

The word “worshiped” is the Greek προσκυνέω [G4352] proskuneō (prahs-koo-neh’-o). This is a compounded word from πρός [G4314pros (prahs) and a probable derivative of κύων [G2965kuón (koo’-ohn). The word pros means in the direction of, moving towards the object, goal, or destination. The word kuón means either a literal dog, or metaphorically, an unworthy and undeserving person who is of lowly status. Thus, this compounded word describes a person of lowly status approaching someone of superiority, such as the King. This word also describes a kiss, like a dog licking its master’s hand. And so this is a description of one “kissing” the ground when prostrating before someone of superior status. Therefore, this word, like the Hebrew word, שָׁחָה [H7812] shachah (shaw-khaw’), describes complete submission and signifies whom you serve.

Acts 10:25-26 says, “25 When Peter entered, Cornelius met him, and fell at his feet and worshiped him. 26 But Peter raised him up, saying, ‘Stand up; I too am just a man.’ ”

Acts 14:11-15 says, “11 When the crowds saw what Paul had done, they raised their voice, saying in the Lycaonian language, ‘The gods have become like men and have come down to us.” 12 And they began calling Barnabas, Zeus, and Paul, Hermes, because he was the chief speaker. 13 The priest of Zeus, whose temple was just outside the city, brought oxen and garlands to the gates, and wanted to offer sacrifice with the crowds. 14 But when the apostles Barnabas and Paul heard of it, they tore their robes and rushed out into the crowd, crying out 15 and saying, “Men, why are you doing these things? We are also men of the same nature as you, and preach the gospel to you that you should turn from these vain things to a living God, who made the heaven and the earth and the sea and all that is in them. ”

Revelation 19:10 says, “Then I fell at his feet to worship him. But he said to me, ‘Do not do that; I am a fellow servant of yours and your brethren who hold the testimony of Jesus; worship God. For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.’ ”

Revelation 22:8-9 says, “I, John, am the one who heard and saw these things. And when I heard and saw, I fell down to worship at the feet of the angel who showed me these things. But he said to me, ‘Do not do that. I am a fellow servant of yours and of your brethren the prophets and of those who heed the words of this book. Worship God.’ ”

The Bible calls attention to incidents when people worshiped who they should never worship, yet Jesus always accepted worship and never rebuked anyone for worshiping Him. GOD’s Word never rebukes or condemns someone who worships Jesus. In fact, Mark 5:6, using the same word proskuneō, describes a demonically possessed man prostrating before Jesus. Hebrews 1:6, referencing Psalm 97:7, affirms that angels worship Jesus.

Matthew 4:8-11 says, “Again, the devil took Him to a very high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory; and he said to Him, “All these things I will give You, if You fall down and worship me.” 10 Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go, Satan! For it is written, “You shall worship the Lord your God, and serve Him only.” ’ 11 Then the devil left Him; and behold, angels came and began to minister to Him.”

The devil wanted Jesus to prostrate before him and serve him as master. This is the same command king Nebuchadnezzar made to Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego in Daniel 3:13-15 when he demanded that they fall down and worship the golden image he had made. But Jesus referenced Deuteronomy 6:13-15, which specifically refers to worshiping YHWH. Therefore, every time Jesus accepted worship from someone and did not rebuke that person, Jesus made Himself equal with YHWH. But Scripture is clear that no one should worship anyone other than YHWH (Exodus 20:1-4; Deuteronomy 5:6-9; 6:13-15). In fact, Isaiah 42:8 says, “I am the Lord, that is My name; I will not give My glory to another, Nor My praise to graven images.” Yet the Bible gives glory to Jesus.

Conclusion:

GOD’s Word provides the logical conclusion that Jesus is GOD based on Jesus getting GOD’s honors, possessing GOD’s attributes, possessing GOD’s names, doing GOD’s deeds, and sitting in GOD’s seat. A mere mortal man does not exist before creation, forgive sins, resurrect to life from the dead, and judge the entire world. Jesus is GOD.

But how can the Son also be the Father? How can the Son and the Father be one and exist in unity? This can only be explained by expounding upon who GOD is as the Trinity.


The Artist J:

As I have already established in what I wrote in the previous Picture Scripture (#46 My God And Your God?), and as Pastor Trenton has just established within this Picture Scripture, Jesus without a doubt claimed to be God in the flesh.

Jesus said things like “My Father is working until now, and I am working” (John 5:17). It was for this reason that the Jews tried harder to kill Jesus, because Jesus called God His Father, and they understood that Jesus was making Himself equal with God. Jesus was claiming to be in complete unity with God, in whom He called His Father.

So the question we have to ask is whether or not Jesus’s claim to be God is true. Is Jesus God? Let’s examine this together.

God is omnipotent, meaning “all-powerful”:

Jesus displays God’s omnipotence in His performance of miraculous healings and the bending of natural laws throughout the Gospels. Like in Luke 8:43-48, where it says “And there was a woman who had had a discharge of blood for twelve years, and though she had spent all her living on physicians, she could not be healed by anyone. She came up behind him [Jesus] and touched the fringe of his garment, and immediately her discharge of blood ceased. And Jesus said, ‘Who was it that touched me?’ When all denied it, Peter said, ‘Master, the crowds surround you and are pressing in on you!’ But Jesus said, ‘Someone touched me, for I perceive that POWER has gone out from me.’ And when the woman saw that she was not hidden, she came trembling, and falling down before him declared in the presence of all the people why she had touched him, and how she had been immediately healed. And he said to her, ‘Daughter, your faith has made you well; go in peace.’ “

Or within Luke 8:22-25, where Jesus displays His power over nature: “One day he [Jesus] got into a boat with his disciples, and he said to them, ‘Let us go across to the other side of the lake.’ So they set out, and as they sailed he fell asleep. And a windstorm came down on the lake, and they were filling with water and were in danger. And they went and woke him, saying, ‘Master, Master, we are perishing!’ And he awoke and rebuked the wind and the raging waves, and they ceased, and there was a calm. He said to them, ‘Where is your faith?’ And they were afraid, and they marveled, saying to one another, ‘Who then is this, that HE COMMANDS even winds and water, and they OBEY HIM?’ “

Jesus’s omnipotence is also displayed within turning the water to wine, walking upon the water of the sea, multiplying the loaves of bread and the fish to feed large multitudes, cursing a fig tree and it withered, causing miraculous catches of fish, casting out demons, cleansing lepers and healing all sorts of ailments, and other disabilities. Jesus displayed the omnipotence of God.

God is omniscient, meaning “all-knowing”:

Jesus displays God’s omniscience in His ability to know people’s thoughts, and in accurately revealing things that were still to take place, and also in knowing things that would be impossible for others to know. Like in Matthew 9:2-7, where it says, “And behold, some people brought to him a paralytic, lying on a bed. And when Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, ‘Take heart, my son; your sins are forgiven.’ And behold, some of the scribes said to themselves, ‘This man is blaspheming.’ But Jesus, KNOWING THEIR THOUGHTS, said, ‘Why do you think evil in your hearts? For which is easier, to say, “Your sins are forgiven,” or to say, “Rise and walk”?  But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins’–he then said to the paralytic—’Rise, pick up your bed and go home.’ And he rose and went home.”

Or in Luke 21:5-6, when Jesus speaks of the temples destruction saying, “And while some were speaking of the temple, how it was adorned with noble stones and offerings, he [Jesus] said, ‘As for these things that you see, the days will come when there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.’ “

In A.D. 66 a Jewish rebellion ignited a war with Rome, and the very temple Jesus spoke of was destroyed in A.D. 70, leaving no stone that was not thrown down, thirty-six years after Jesus said it would happen.

In Matthew 17:24-27, Jesus proves that just as God knows how many hairs are on our heads and is even fully aware of where every animal is at (Matthew 10:29-30), Jesus is also fully aware of even the animals upon the earth: “When they came to Capernaum, the collectors of the two-drachma tax went up to Peter and said, ‘Does your teacher not pay the tax?’  He [Jesus] said, ‘Yes.’ And when he came into the house, Jesus spoke to him first, saying, ‘What do you think, Simon? From whom do kings of the earth take toll or tax? From their sons or from others?’  And when he said, ‘From others,’ Jesus said to him, ‘Then the sons are free. However, not to give offense to them, GO TO THE SEA AND CAST A HOOK AND TAKE THE FIRST FISH THAT COMES UP, AND WHEN YOU OPEN IT’S MOUTH YOU WILL FIND A SHEKEL. Take that and give it to them for me and for yourself.’ “

Jesus’s omniscience is also displayed when He saw and knew who Nathaniel was before they even met (John 1:48). Jesus knew who was going to betray him (John 13:11). In Matthew 12:25, and in Luke 6:8 Jesus again knows the thoughts of people.

Jesus obviously displayed God’s attributes of love, faithfulness, mercy and grace, but one of the biggest indicators that Jesus is God is fulfilled prophecy. Not only did Jesus claim to be God, but Jesus claimed to be God’s Messiah (Anointed One) and Savior. Right from the start of Jesus’s ministry in Luke 4:16-21 it says, “And he [Jesus] came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up. And as was his custom, he went to the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and he stood up to read. And the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written, ‘The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has ANOINTED ME to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.’ And he rolled up the scroll and gave it back to the attendant and sat down. And the eyes of all in the synagogue were fixed on him. And he began to say to them, ‘TODAY THIS SCRIPTURE HAS BEEN FULFILLED IN YOUR HEARING.’ “

So did Jesus accurately fulfill prophesy? If He did, this would prove that Jesus was telling the truth that He was God’s anointed one, and if God had anointed Him then Jesus would also not be lying when He also said He was God.

So here are some verses that I compiled a few years ago that I like to call “The Gospel according to the Prophets”. All these verses are entirely from the Old Testament. Read these and see if this sounds like it could have been fulfilled by literally anyone else other than Jesus.

The Gospel using only Old Testament verses:

“But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah [referring to the city of Bethlehem], too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you One will go forth for Me [God] to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, from the days of eternity [which means this ruler would have always existed with God]. Therefore He will give them up until the time when she who is in labor has borne a child. Then the remainder of His brethren will return to the sons of Israel. And He will arise and shepherd His flock in the strength of the Lord, in the majesty of the name of the Lord His God. Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel [God with us].”

I will open My mouth in a parable; I will utter dark sayings of old. The Spirit of the Lord God is upon Me, because the Lord has anointed Me to bring good news to the afflicted; He has sent Me to bind up the brokenhearted, To proclaim liberty to captives and freedom to prisoners; but He [this anointed one] was despised and forsaken of men, a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief; and like one from whom men hide their face He was despised, and we did not esteem Him. Even my close friend in whom I trusted, who ate My bread, has lifted up his heel against Me. “Throw it to the potter, that magnificent price at which I was valued by them.” So I [the friend] took the thirty shekels of silver and threw them to the potter in the house of the Lord.

By oppression and judgment He [the Anointed One] was taken away; He was oppressed and He was afflicted, yet He did not open His mouth; like a lamb that is led to slaughter, and like a sheep that is silent before its shearers, so He did not open His mouth. I gave My back to those who strike Me, and My cheeks to those who pluck out the beard; I did not cover My face from humiliation and spitting. For dogs have surrounded me; a band of evildoers has encompassed me; They pierced my hands and my feet. I can count all my bones. They look, they stare at Me; They divide My garments among them, And for My clothing they cast lots. So that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn. They also gave Me gall for My food, and for My thirst they gave Me vinegar to drink. All who see Me sneer at Me; They separate with the lip, they wag the head, saying, “Commit yourself to the Lord; let Him deliver him; Let Him rescue him, because He delights in him.” But He was pierced through for our transgressions, He was crushed for our iniquities; the chastening for our well-being fell upon Him, and by His scourging we are healed. All of us like sheep have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; but the Lord has caused the iniquity of us all to fall on Him.

My God, my God, why have You forsaken me? Far from My deliverance are the words of My groaning. But the Lord was pleased to crush Him, putting Him to grief; If He would render Himself as a guilt offering, He will see His offspring, He will prolong His days, and the good pleasure of the Lord will prosper in His hand. As a result of the anguish of His soul, He will see it and be satisfied; by His knowledge the Righteous One, My Servant, will justify the many, as He will bear their iniquities.

He was cut off out of the land of the living, for the transgression of my people, to whom the stroke was due. His grave was assigned with wicked men, yet He was with a rich man in His death, because He had done no violence, nor was there any deceit in His mouth.

For You will not abandon my soul to Sheol; nor will You allow Your Holy One to undergo decay. But God will redeem My soul from the power of Sheol, for He will receive Me. Therefore, I [God the Father] will allot Him a portion with the great, and He will divide the spoil with the strong; because He poured out Himself to death, and was numbered with the transgressors; yet He Himself bore the sin of many, and interceded for the transgressors. The Lord says to my Lord: “Sit at My right hand until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet.”

(Micah 5:2-4, Isaiah 7:14, Psalm 78:2, Isaiah 61:1, Isaiah 53:3, Psalm 41:9, Zachariah 11:13, Isaiah 53:7-8, Isaiah 50:6, Psalm 22:16-18, Zachariah 12:10, Psalm 69:21, Psalm 22:7-8, Isaiah 53:5-6, Psalm 22:1-2, Isaiah 53:10-11, Isaiah 53:8-9, Psalm 16:10, Psalm 49:15, Isaiah 53:12, Psalm 110:1)

That is the Gospel of Jesus Christ! From His virgin birth, to His ministry, to His betrayal, to His beatings and crucifixion, to the Romans casting lots for His clothes, to baring our sin, to His death and resurrection, to ascending and sitting at the right hand of the Father. Jesus proved that He was the fulfiller of the prophets and anointed savior, and He proved that He is God, that He and the Father are one!

He was and is and will always be in perfect unity with His Father, still completely in direct congruency while His body was being knit by the Potter, eternal but born, dust but divine, God incarnate, submissive but equivalent, King and advocate, a being like no other, a visible display of God the Father, embassary and servant, a perfect sacrifice, their is no other, sent to circumvent sin on behalf of men, perfect innocence to pay iniquities sentence, no other position from God could be so high, as to lower one’s self for His creation and die, conquer death, rise again, saying “the keys are mine”, hell’s sting is gone, Glory to the anointed and beloved Son, Jesus Christ who verified His statement, “I and the Father are one.”

John-10-30

Church History – Part 1 (AD 30-177)

[ If you missed the introduction to this series, you can read it here: “Church History – Introduction” ]

Christian church history did not begin at the birth of Jesus [like many assume]; rather, it started “in the beginning” (Genesis 1:1). Christianity is the continuity and completion of Judaism. To see how this is so, read my other article, “Is Judaism and Christianity Complementary or Contradictory?

In AD 30, Jesus was crucified, He resurrected, and then ascended into Heaven after revealing Himself to multiple people. Also in that same year was the Holy Spirit’s arrival at Pentecost. In 33, Stephen was the first Christian martyr. Saul of Tarsus had been one of the people responsible for the death of Stephen. In that same year of 33, Saul encountered Jesus, became a Christian, and was from that point on known as Paul. Around 43, Antioch became the center of Christian activity. In 45, Barnabas brought Paul to Antioch. In 47-48, Paul and Barnabas visited Galatia during their first missionary journey. In 49, the Jerusalem Council recognized that the Gospel is also for Gentiles. In that same year, Roman emperor, Claudius, forced the Jews out of Rome; Priscilla and Aquila left Rome and ended up in Corinth where they meet Paul. Around 49-52, Paul had a vision of a man from Macedonia and visited there for the first time during his second missionary journey; Timothy traveled with Paul and Silas. In 50, Paul, Silas, and other missionaries landed at Philippi and the church was established there. In that same year, Paul also went to Thessalonica and established a church there. Around 50-52, Paul visited Corinth for the first time on his second missionary journey. Around 51, Luke joined Paul, Silas, and Timothy during Paul’s second missionary journey. In 52-54, Paul taught in Ephesus. In 52, Emperor Claudius installed Felix as procurator of Judea. From 52-62, Paul defended his faith before Roman procurators Felix (52-60) and Festus (60-62). From 54-68, Emperor Nero ruled the Roman Empire. Around 57-59, Paul was imprisoned in Caesarea. In 60, Paul had been shipwrecked on the island of Malta en route to Rome. Around 60-63, Luke wrote his Gospel and the book of Acts.

In AD 64, there was a great fire in Rome that destroyed 70% of the capital city. Emperor Nero (AD 54-68) blamed the fire on Christians. Prior to the Jewish revolts and the great fire, Christians had been largely ignored by those in power, with of course some martyrs sprinkled throughout the timeline. According to the Jewish-Roman historian Josephus, the Sanhedrin ordered James (linking James as the brother of Jesus) to be stoned to death around AD 62. But because of the great fire two years later (AD 64), persecution came down hard on Christians because Nero blamed the fire on the Christians. According to early church tradition, Peter died in Rome during Nero’s persecution, crucified upside down. It is said that Paul also died during the intense persecution between AD 64-65. And because of the Jews’ open revolts against the empire’s overstepping of boundaries, Nero eventually gave General Vespasian 60,000 soldiers to regain Galilee and Judea. And because Vespasian conquered Galilee, we have the writings from Josephus. It is said that Josephus surrendered to Vespasian. Before attacking Jerusalem, Nero had apparently committed suicide and Vespasian returned to Rome to claim the imperial throne. Josephus went with him and ended up writing his major treatises there. An important mention in the historian’s writings (Antiquities of the Jews) is the reference to Jesus as a historical figure who was reputed to be a prophet and miracle worker who had been crucified under Pontius Pilate.

After becoming emperor, Vespasian sent his son, Titus, and an army back to Jerusalem to besiege the city. However, before besieging the city, the Jews were allowed to enter into the city for the Passover celebration, thereby collecting more Jews in one area than might have been possible otherwise. But just like in the lyrics of Hotel California by the Eagles, they could come in, but they were not to leave. The Temple was eventually destroyed in AD 70, thereby fulfilling the prophecy of Jesus (see Matthew 24:2). Only one wall of the temple mount (known today as the “Wailing Wall”) remained. And because of all this, many Jews who desired to avoid further tragedies, excluded all fringe groups, including Christians, from their synagogues. But where had the Christians been during the siege of the city? Eusebius tells us that the Christians, acting on a revelation, to flee to a certain town called Perea, which they called Pella. After the disastrous Jewish War of AD 66-73, large numbers of Jews moved away from their traditional homes (Dispersions). And then up until AD 81, Christians were largely ignored again. But then Vespasian’s son, Domitian, became emperor (AD 81-96) and demanded divinity status (divus) and to be declared as Dominos et Deus Noster (‘Our Lord and God’). But persecution continued even after a new emperor, Trajan, took the throne.

Polycarp was one of the martyrs — he had been burned alive because he refused to deny Christ. According to Irenaeus, Polycarp was his spiritual mentor and Polycarp was a disciple of apostle John. In the second century century AD, apologists began defending their faith and their innocence, desiring to prove that Christians weren’t criminals. The most famous of the apologists was a man named Justin. Justin studied the philosophies of Aristotle, Plato, Pythagoras, and the Stoics. Around AD 132, he eventually came to the conclusion that Christianity was the “one sure worthy philosophy.” In AD 165, he was beheaded and soon became known as “Justin Martyr.” Christianity was unpopular in the first and second centuries for a few reasons: Christianity went against the social order and opposed the pluralistic, polytheistic, and relativistic ways of life that catered to the pursuit of pleasure. And if we substitute polytheistic for atheistic, we find the reasons for Christianity being unpopular remain the same today of the Western world in 2017. And much like today, GOD used human factors to produce spiritual results. The allowance of the Roman empire produced the dissatisfaction of the empire; consequently, many found refuge in the grace of Christ. Those in power produced persecution, which caused the stirring of faith and the scattering of believers; consequently, seeds of salvation grew in areas that needed the Gospel. Think about it: in the depth of the darkness, surrounded by soil, the future of the buried seed always looks hopeless. But that’s where growth takes place; that growth will eventually be known when it shoots up, breaking through the soil to proclaim life.

[ To read Part 2, CLICK HERE! ]

Columbus Day?


When I wrote this article, it was Columbus Day of 2017 (the 2nd Monday of October). The discovery of America most commonly refers to Christopher Columbus’s 1492 transatlantic maritime expedition, in which he became the ‘first’ ‘Christian’ European to make landfall in the ‘Americas’ (A.K.A. ‘New World’). On August 3, 1492, Columbus and his crew set to sail the ocean blue from Spain in three ships: the Nina, the Pinta and the Santa Maria. A couple months later on October 12th, the ships made landfall — not in Asia, as Columbus assumed, but on one of the Bahamian islands. (Yes — Columbus ‘discovered’ America by accident.)

Because it was Columbus Day, I anticipated the controversial day to ignite the typical arguments amongst our divided nation. Many people believe that Columbus Day should not be celebrated because of the following reasons:

  • Christopher Columbus never actually set foot on the continental U.S.
  • America was not a vacant lot and the ‘discovery’ of America involved the enslavement and genocide of the Native American people. Therefore, people say we should instead celebrate Indigenous People’s Day.
  • To celebrate Christopher Columbus is to celebrate slavery, conquest, and murder.
  • According to the Pew Research Center, it’s already “one of the most inconsistently celebrated U.S. holidays.” Federal employees get the day off, but otherwise, workers in only 23 states receive a paid day off to mark the holiday.

Among the many arguments I expected to hear, one in particular was the one I cared most to discuss. Inevitably, I knew that at least one person would bring up how Christopher Columbus considered himself to be a Christian yet he also condoned slavery and participated in enslaving others. This usually brings up the argument that the Bible endorses slavery. But is this true? See my other article to fully investigate that subject matter, but the short answer is “No.”

So, should we celebrate Columbus Day? Personally, I don’t care if we celebrate it; however, I do believe it is important that we remember accurately our history, to know the important role it plays in our lives today, and to use that knowledge to better our future. I believe Christianty.com’s article, “Should Christians Honor the Legacy of Columbus?” states it best that Columbus’ “missionary drive which was prominent during his first voyage, in later voyages became subordinate to his love of wealth and position. Unfortunately, Columbus was not the last to lose sight of his spiritual goals when tempted with wealth and power.”

Was Columbus a Christian? Apparently so. Was he a perfect Christian? No. It is important to remember that good intentions can travel in the wrong direction. I believe an important question to consider is this: Was GOD able to turn the bad that happened into something good? And the answer to that is yes!

“People ruin their lives by their own stupidity, so why does God always get blamed?”
(Proverbs 19:3) -MSG

Columbus only played a small role in the beginning of America, but Christ was the foundation of America and the only reason why America ever became great:

  • In the Mayflower Compact, the Pilgrims declared their intention of planting a new colony and advancing the Christian faith.
  • Most of America’s Founding Fathers were active Christians, representing a variety of denominations.
  • Of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, 24 had received seminary education.
  • The December 27, 1982 edition of Newsweek magazine stated, “Historians are discovering that the Bible, perhaps even more than the constitution, is our founding document.”
  • After an intensive study of our nation’s religious history, the U.S. Supreme Court declared in an 1892 case, “This is a Christian nation.”

Are we still a Christian nation? Well, that’s up to us to decide. But should we tolerate tolerance that attempts to knock the very foundation out from beneath us to send our country crumbling?

And if you are hung up on the topic of slavery, it is important for you to know two things:

  1. Christians abolished slavery while everyone else generally stood by and watched.
  2. You are most likely a slave yourself without even realizing it.

In conclusion, I admit that I don’t celebrate Christopher Columbus today; instead, I celebrate the resurrection of Christ — just like I do every day! It is only in Christ we can experience true freedom. Christ is the foundation (Matthew 7:24-27)! Apart from Christ, you are a slave to your own desires. If you do not know Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior, I urge you to seek Truth (Matthew 7:7-8) with all your heart, soul, mind and strength!

To find out why I am a Christian, see my other article, “Why I Am A Christian