Chronological Study (012/365)

Genesis 32:1 – 35:27


THE GOD OF ISRAEL
(Genesis 32-33)

Genesis 32:1-2 says, “Now as Jacob went on his way, the angels of God met him. Jacob said when he saw them, ‘This is God’s camp.’ So he named that place Mahanaim.”

Reminiscent of Jacob’s vision of the ladder/stairway to Heaven (28:16-17), Jacob again is granted access to see into the spiritual realm. This time, he notices that the angels are with him, not merely going up and down between Heaven and earth. The word “camp” is the Hebrew word מַֽחֲנֶה [H4264] maḥănê (makh-an-ay’), which means a camp, host, or company, whether of soldiers or tribes. And the word “Mahanaim” Jacob chose to name the location is the Hebrew מַֽחֲנַיִם [H4266] maḥănayim (makh-an-ay’-yim), which is the dual of the prior word and means two camps. In other words, Jacob essentially exclaimed, “My camp is here, but so is a heavenly camp of the Lord’s angels!” Whereas Bethel (which means “house of God”), suggested a fixed location for GOD, this maḥănê (camp) implies that the Lord’s heavenly army is mobile. Indeed, GOD is with Jacob, just as He promised He would be (28:15).

In 32:3-5, knowing that he is returning to the land of his father, Jacob takes the initiative to reconnect with his brother Esau because he knows that he will eventually be forced to confront his past. Seeking to find favor in his brother’s sight, Jacob instructs his messengers to go ahead of him to Esau. In the Hebrew, word play is involved between 32:1 and 32:3 with the word מַלְאָךְ [H4397] mal’āḵ (mal-awk’), which does mean messenger when referring to a mere human, but is also translated to mean an angel when referring to the Lord’s messenger. So, the Lord sent messengers (angels) from His camp to meet Jacob, and Jacob decides to send messengers from his camp to meet Esau. When Jacob sends his messengers, he instructs them to address Esau as “lord” and to refer to Jacob as his “servant”. Now, when Jacob calls Esau “lord”, it is important to understand that Jacob is not referring to him as the Lord, or acknowledging him as a god; rather, the word “lord” is the Hebrew אָדוֹן [H113] ‘āḏôn (aw-done’), which means a king, a master, an owner, or someone who is in control. Thus, Jacob acknowledging and declaring himself to be in a lower position than Esau was an act of humility. In fact, this act of humility is a redemptive role reversal of when Jacob took advantage of Esau in order to acquire his birthright and blessing (25:29-34; 27:5-38). Essentially, Jacob’s actions declared that he was not first; moreover, he desired for Esau to be blessed.

In 32:6-8, Jacob’s messengers returned and stated that Esau was coming to meet him and that 400 men were with Esau. This news terrified Jacob. Why? Because in 27:41-42, the last memory he had of his brother is when his mother informed him that Esau intended to murder him. After all, with only 318 men, Abraham defeated the combined forces of four kings (14:14-16), so 400 men had the potential of completely wiping out Jacob and his entire line. Consequently, Jacob divided everyone and everything into two camps, thinking that if Esau attacked them, then at least one camp might be able to escape with their lives. Now, the Hebrew word used is מַֽחֲנֶה [H4264] maḥănê (makh-an-ay’), which is the same word that was used to describe the two camps of Jacob’s tribe and the angels of the Lord in 32:1-2. At first, Jacob was one whole camp, but then the fear of his brother tore him in half into two camps. But if the second camp was supposed to be the angels of the Lord who were with him, why did Jacob allow the fear of his brother to overcome him? Simply put, the reason is because Jacob was human and he allowed his emotions to overcome the logical truth that the Lord’s angels were with him. However, despite his fear, in 32:9-12, Jacob responded by turning to the Lord in prayer. Though Jacob did use GOD’s personal name (YHWH) for the first time, Jacob prayed to the GOD of Abraham and Isaac, revealing yet again that he had not committed himself wholeheartedly to a personal relationship with the Lord. In his prayer, he reminded the Lord of all that the Lord had promised him and then he requested for the Lord’s protection while also humbly acknowledging the fact that he was undeserving of all the love and faithfulness the Lord had already shown him, recognizing that he started with nothing and is now blessed to even be able to be two camps. Jacob reflected on his decision to walk with the Lord and how it brought him blessings. Why would the GOD of Bethel abandon him now? Truly, there’s only two paths we can walk in life, either the path of righteousness or the path of wickedness (Deuteronomy 11:26-28; 30:15-20; Proverbs 3:6-7; Ezekiel 18; John 3:18-21; Romans 1:28; 1John 3:4-10). C.S. Lewis might have said it best: “There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.’ ” And so Jacob stayed where he was at while waiting for the Lord to guide him under His protection.

In Genesis 32:13-21, Jacob attempted to spend the night where he was at, but apparently was unable to sleep. While waiting for the Lord to respond to his prayer of protection, Jacob formulated a plan and then took action. Jacob decided to send ahead of him a peace offering gift of over 500 animals for Esau to keep for himself. This gift was larger than many towns would have been able to pay in tribute to conquering kings even at later dates, indicating just how much GOD had blessed Jacob. Not only did Jacob send over 500 animals, but in a tactical move of defense, he sent them one drove at a time, and put a space between each drove. If Esau and his men had in mind to conquer and plunder, this would have potentially saved them the trouble of exerting energy in battle. After sending the peace offering ahead of him, Jacob was still unable to sleep and so in 32:22-23, he decided to send everyone and everything across the shallow point of the Jabbok (yab-boke’) river to continue their journey even though it was still dark outside.

However, in 32:24-32, this decision to send everyone and everything across the river left Jacob alone on the other side, and abruptly, “a man” wrestled with him until daybreak. Thus, Scripture reveals a theme of mankind’s unceasing desire to wrestle against each other and against GOD. At first, Leah and Rachel wrestled against each other (30:7-8), then Laban and Jacob wrestled against each other (29:25; 31:26-30), and now Jacob finds himself wrestling with a mysterious “man”. Now, when this “man” saw that Jacob wouldn’t allow Him to prevail against Jacob, the “man” dislocated the socket of Jacob’s thigh where it meets his hip and then He told Jacob to let Him go because the dawn was breaking. Jacob, however, said he refused to let go until the “man” blessed him. In response to Jacob’s request to be blessed, the “man” asked Jacob, “What is your name?” And Jacob answered, “Jacob.” However, the “man” said, “Your name shall no longer be Jacob, but Israel; for you have striven with God and with men and have prevailed.” Jacob then asked for the name of the “man”, but His response was only, “Why is it that you ask my name?” And then the “man” blessed Jacob. And then as it is written, Jacob named the place Peniel because he said, “I have seen God face to face, yet my life has been preserved.” And then as the sun came up, and the “man” was gone, Jacob continued his journey, limping.

As previously discussed in the topic of theophany, the “man” in this story is none other than the preincarnate Christ, the Lord Himself. For this reason, Jacob named the location פְּנוּאֵל [H6439] penû’ēl (pen-oo-ale’), which means face of God or facing God. It is also the reason the Lord said to Jacob, “you have striven with God and with men and have prevailed.” How did Jacob prevail? Because he refused to give up; he was determined to be blessed. Jacob refused to let go of the Lord and so he received the Lord’s blessing! Hosea 12:3 will later recount this event by saying, “In the womb he took his brother by the heel, And in his maturity he contended with God.”

Now, even though Jacob said that he had seen GOD “face to face”, that does not mean he literally saw the entirety of the Lord’s face. Not only is this an expression that describes personal or intimate contact, but we must remember that the entire wrestling match happened during the darkness of night. For this reason, I believe the Lord instructed Jacob to let go of Him prior to sunrise so that Jacob would not be able to see His face entirely. In fact, the Lord chose to dislocate the socket of Jacob’s thigh to initiate a conclusion to the wrestling match because Jacob refused to let go until he received a blessing. However, to receive His blessing, Jacob had to answer a simple question: “What is your name?” And Jacob answered, “Jacob.” But why did Jacob’s answer of such a simple truth earn him the blessing? Because Jacob’s history had been centered around lies regarding his identity. In Genesis 27:18-19, Isaac asked Jacob who he was, but Jacob lied and claimed to be Esau, the person who rightfully deserved the blessing. But this time, Jacob told the truth and humbly confessed his character flaw and his true identity – he is Jacob, the heel grabber, deceiver, and supplanter (25:26; 27:36). In his past, Jacob had been determined to be blessed even if he had to receive his blessing through deceitful deeds. Though Jacob is still seeking to be blessed (which is a good desire), he is now humble and desires to receive blessings through honesty and hard work. Due to Jacob’s character development over 20 years of being deceived by Laban, Jacob was now humble enough to receive the Lord’s blessing. Hence, the Lord renamed him from Jacob to “Israel”, which is the Hebrew יִשְׂרָאֵל [H3478] yiśrā’ēl (yis-raw-ale’), which means God’s power, God prevails, God fights, or God contends. Thus, the Lord made it known that every blessing and victory Jacob will ever receive will not come from Jacob’s own power out from deception, but due to the Lord’s power, holiness, love, and grace. However, the name Israel also has a meaning of contending with GOD, implying that Jacob wrestled with GOD and will no longer strive against man because all his struggles will now be taken directly to the Lord. And the fact that Jacob wrestled the Lord in the darkness and then became Israel when the sun came up showcases the image of salvation! Consider the following:

In Isaiah 9:2, the prophet speaks of hope in the Messiah and says, “The people who walk in darkness Will see a great light; Those who live in a dark land, The light will shine on them.” And then Jesus quotes this verse in Matthew 4:16.

In John 8:12, Jesus says, “I am the Light of the world; he who follows Me will not walk in the darkness, but will have the Light of life.”

In John 12:46, Jesus says, “I have come as Light into the world, so that everyone who believes in Me will not remain in darkness.”

In Acts 26:18, after Jesus blinded Paul (Saul) with light brighter than the sun, Jesus commanded Paul to open the eyes of both Jews and Gentiles “so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in [Christ].”

In Romans 13:12, Paul says, “The night is almost gone, and the day is near. Therefore let us lay aside the deeds of darkness and put on the armor of light.”

In Ephesians 5:8, Paul says, “you were formerly darkness, but now you are Light in the Lord; walk as children of Light.”

In Colossians 1:13-14, Paul says, “13 For He rescued us from the domain of darkness, and transferred us to the kingdom of His beloved Son, 14 in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.”

In 1Thessalonians 5:4-6, Paul says, “But you, brethren, are not in darkness, that the day would overtake you like a thief; for you are all sons of light and sons of day. We are not of night nor of darkness; so then let us not sleep as others do, but let us be alert and sober.”

In 1Peter 2:9-10, Peter says, “But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession, so that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; 10 for you once were not a people, but now you are the people of God; you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.”

Therefore, Jacob – now Israel – is a representative of GOD-Almighty and now walks in the light as a chosen child of GOD of the royal priesthood. However, so that Israel would understand not to rely on his own power, the Lord dislocated the socket of his thigh; consequently, Israel continued on his journey, blessed by the Lord, but humbled and limping, no longer able to run away from the consequences of his choices. And this entire story paints a beautiful picture that when a person seeks the Lord in prayer and asks to be rescued, that person will encounter a wrestling match with the Lord due to his/her sinful nature of darkness. And when that person wrestles with the Lord while seeking the Lord’s blessing, that person will never walk the same again because that person will be changed, will become a new person, will not rely upon his/her own strength, and will rely upon the Lord. That person will be changed and will walk in the light as a chosen child of GOD of the royal priesthood! Israel became a wrestler who overcomes and receives blessings because the Lord took hold of him. The Lord taught Israel not to grab at the heel of any man, but to hold on to GOD and never let go. If you set out to grab onto GOD, GOD will grab hold of you! For this reason, it is written in James 4:8, “Draw near to God and He will draw near to you.” And when the Lord grabs hold of you, truly, as it is written in 2Corinthians 5:17, “Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.” For this reason, it is also written in Revelation 2:17, “To him who overcomes, to him I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, and a new name written on the stone which no one knows but he who receives it.”

In Genesis 33:1-3, Israel, now limping, and still having not slept the night before, yet sober and alert, looked up and noticed that Esau and his 400 men were coming toward him. With adrenaline flowing through his veins, Israel divided the children among the two maids, Leah, and Rachel, putting the maids and their children in front, Leah and her children after them, and then Rachel and Joseph last. Why did he do this? Favoritism. Israel positioned them according to prioritized favor, which would have allowed Rachel and Joseph the best opportunity to flee for their lives if Esau and his men attacked. And with Joseph being the only child listed by name, Scripture is setting the stage for his prominent position we will later see. However, in a selfless and masculine act of love, Israel then “passed on ahead of them and bowed down to the ground seven times, until he came near to his brother”, placing himself between the women and children and the potential threat. Before Israel wrestled with GOD, he planned to stay behind and use his servants as shields to protect himself (32:16-21); however, after receiving his new name and identity, he decided to go ahead of everyone in an act of sacrificial love. This is an example of how the love of GOD changes us from the inside out and realigns us with GOD’s will! The fact that he bowed down to the ground seven times showcases total submission, signifying to Esau that if he had any intentions of battle, then Israel surrendered in advance. Essentially, Israel gave honor to Esau while also requesting mercy and pleading for peace. And then 33:4 says that Esau ran to Israel. How would you feel in that moment if you were Israel, not knowing if your brother is running toward you with excitement or with rage? Yet the verse continues by saying that Esau embraced Israel and then they both wept. 20 years of emotions streamed down their faces in the form of tears. By Esau forgiving Jacob and not attacking him, Esau was showing Jacob the love of GOD (Matthew 6:12-15; 18:21-35; Mark 11:25; Luke 6:37; 7:47; 11:4; 17:3-4; 2Corinthians 2:7-8; Colossians 3:13). After all, as it is written, ‘the one who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has not seen” (1John 4:20; see also, 1Timothy 5:8).

In Genesis 33:5-11, Israel continues to address Esau as “lord” and refers to himself as “servant” while explaining that all the animals Esau had seen were a gift for him. Esau, addressing Israel as his “brother” declines the gift at first, but at Israel’s insistence, he finally accepts the gift. Esau’s acceptance of the gift was important to Israel because this was restitution for the wrongdoings he had committed against his brother 20 years ago. Now, in 33:10, when Israel said, “I see your face as one sees the face of God, and you have received me favorably”, he was not implying that Esau was like a god, but merely making a connection of the fact that Esau received him favorably and spared his life just like the “man” did who recently blessed him (32:30). If you remember, Israel believed he saw the “face of God” in that “man” who received him favorably, blessed him, and spared his life. Thus, to be received with such favor is like the encounter he had with the Lord. Therefore, when we act like the Lord, people will see the Lord when they look at us.

In 33:12, Esau says, “Let us take our journey and go, and I will go before you.” The minor details in the language are important. Esau used inclusive language such as “us” and “our” to communicate to his brother that there is no division between them. Further, Esau even offered to go before Israel, signifying that he will ensure Israel’s safety. However, in 33:13-18, Israel, still addressing his brother as “lord” and referring to himself as “servant”, explains that he is unable to travel with Esau and his men because their fast pace would be a strain on all the youth of the children and animals. And then for reasons unknown, Israel tells Esau that he would eventually meet him in Seir (say-eer’). However, the remainder of the passage goes on to state that Israel traveled in the opposite direction to Succoth and then on to Shechem, without ever mentioning Israel going to Seir. Why not? Did Israel lie to his brother? Did he visit him at some point later on yet Scripture doesn’t mention it? Scripture is silent on the matter, but the immediate context seems to imply that Israel won’t allow himself to trust Esau, and he simply desires to continue on his journey without meeting up with his brother. All known details seem to imply that Israel didn’t want to inform Esau where he was going or what he was about to do. Of course, that is mere speculation, but I believe it is a reasonable belief considering all available evidence.

Though Scripture does not say anything more regarding Seir, Scripture does state that the Lord brought Israel back safely to the land of Canaan into the city of Shechem, thus mostly fulfilling His promise made 20 years ago (28:15). And then 33:19-20 concludes with Israel purchasing some land in that city, fulfilling GOD’s promise to Abraham (12:7). Israel then possibly reconstructs the altar Abraham had built there, by building an altar and calling it “El-Elohe-Israel.” Why is this important? Because “El-Elohe-Israel” means “God, the God of Israel”. Therefore, Israel finally made the decision to have a personal relationship with the Lord rather than referring to the Lord as “the God of Abraham” or “the God of Isaac”. The Lord is now the GOD of Israel.

  • In Genesis 32:1-2, Jacob had been in awe that a camp of the Lord’s angels had been with him. But are you aware that a heavenly host of the Lord’s angels are with you wherever you are? Do you have the same sense of awe? If you could see them where you are right now, how would that change your perspective regarding your current circumstance?
  • In 32:3-5, Jacob took the initiative to restore the relationship with his brother. What followed was a successful restoration and an encounter with the Lord which concluded with the Lord blessing Jacob. But what about you? Is there a relationship that has been broken between you and someone else because of the wrong you’ve committed? If so, are you willing to take the initiative to restore that relationship?
  • In 32:9-12, Jacob’s first response to his fear and uncertainty regarding his future was to pray to the Lord. But what about you? Is prayer your last resort or your first response?
  • If there are only two paths we can walk, then there are really only two camps in which we can dwell. Where are you walking? In which campground do you dwell?
  • In 32:24-32, Jacob refused to let go of the Lord; consequently, he received His blessing. But what about you? Regardless of circumstances, are you determined to never let go of the Lord until you receive His blessing?
  • We must be persistent in our faith and refuse to let go of GOD until we are blessed (Matthew 7:7-11; Luke 18:1-8; 11:5-13)! Where in your spiritual life do you need the persistence and endurance of a wrestler?
  • In order for Jacob to be blessed by the Lord, he first had to confess his true identity and character flaws of being sinful. Only those who confess their sinful nature showcase a need for the Lord’s blessing. 1John 1:9 says, “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” Are you willing to confess your sinful nature?
  • Every wrestling match Jacob ever found himself in, he came out victorious. Have you wrestled with your identity? Have you wrestled against your sinful nature? Have you wrestled against your pride? Have you wrestled against addiction? What things in your life do you need to wrestle against and come out victorious?
  • Jacob had been named after his character. But what about you? What if you were named after your character? What would be your name? Liar? Murderer? Pervert? Lustful? Angry? Cheater? Jerk? So… what is your name? Who are you? Confess your name and confess your sins. Wrestle with the Lord and ask for a new identity. What name do you want to have? What would you like to be called? Helper? Encourager? Trustworthy? Honest? Man of GOD? Woman of GOD?
  • Have you had a personal wrestling encounter with the Lord that ended up in you being changed and never walking the same again? If so, what is your story? And have you shared that story with anyone? If you have a testimony, are you willing to share your story? Just as we needed to hear Jacob’s story, don’t you think there are people who need to hear your story?
  • In Genesis 33:3, Israel placed himself between the women and children and a potential attacker even though he had been injured, he was exhausted, and without sleep. In John 15:13, Jesus says, “Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends.” So, are you loving enough to place yourself between the enemy and those who are weaker or innocent?
  • In Genesis 33:10, Israel saw the Lord in Esau due to his lovingkindness. But what about you? When people look at you, do they see a reflection of the Lord? If you have been changed by the Lord, do you not realize that when people look at you, they should see a representative of GOD-Almighty who now walks in the light as a chosen child of GOD of the royal priesthood?

 

DEDICATION TO DINAH
(Genesis 34)

Genesis 34:1 says that Leah’s daughter, Dinah, went out one day to visit with other daughters of the land. But 34:2 says, “When Shechem the son of Hamor the Hivite, the prince of the land, saw her, he took her and lay with her by force.” Now, Dinah was not to blame for Shechem raping her; Shechem would have been the only person condemned in this scenario. However, a curious question does arise regarding Dinah’s situation: why did she go out to visit with the other daughters of the land? Did she have a good reason to leave the safety of her home or did she go when she should not have traveled? In 1Timothy 5:13, Paul says that some young women, “learn to be idle, as they go around from house to house; and not merely idle, but also gossips and busybodies, talking about things not proper to mention.” So, did Dinah go where she should not have been? We don’t know; Scripture is silent on the matter. But because Scripture describes this event as if it were a normal occurrence for Dinah, it seems likely that she was completely innocent. However, Dinah’s innocence seems to have been combined with complacency. Had she traveled alone? If so, it’s likely that her youthful immaturity led her to be isolated and vulnerable to the attack. But again, even if Dinah had somehow set herself up to enter into a dangerous scenario, Shechem would be the only person condemned in this scenario; Dinah was a victim. However, it’s always good to thoughtfully consider how events unfolded and why things happened the way they did.

It is written that Shechem is the son of Hamor the Hivite. If you remember, Genesis 10:17 informed us that the Hivites are descendants of Ham (one of Noah’s sons), through the Canaanites. They were indigenous inhabitants of the promised land, and they were usually referred to along with other groups such as the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, and Jebusites. Later in our chronological journey, the Lord will command the Israelites to conquer these people and take over the promised land (Exodus 3:8; 23:23; Deuteronomy 7:1).

Genesis 34:3 says, “He was deeply attracted to Dinah the daughter of Jacob, and he loved the girl and spoke tenderly to her.” Now, when it says that “He was deeply attracted to” Dinah, that English translation comes from two Hebrew words. First, the word דָּבַק [H1692] dāḇaq (dawb-vak’) means to stick to, to cling to, and hence, connected to [someone/something]. Second, the word נֶפֶשׁ [H5315] nep̄ešh (neh’-fesh) means soul, self, life, person, living being, that which breathes the breath of life. Therefore, the Hebrew literally means that Shechem’s soul had connected to Dinah’s soul and stuck to her. As a natural consequence of that sexual relation with her, he experienced and felt the power of GOD’s design of two becoming one (2:24). However, Shechem acted sinfully outside of GOD’s design because Dinah was not his wife and she had been unwilling to become one with him. And because his soul had connected to her, he realized that he “loved” her. Though the Hebrew word אָהַב [H157] ‘āhaḇ (aw-hav’) does mean to love, the irony of this situation is that the proper context of the scenario reveals the opposite. Obviously Shechem did not love Dinah; if he had loved her, he would not have raped her. The truth is that his initial feeling had been lust, not love. However, after he experienced the beauty of his soul connecting to her soul and becoming one with her, he then desired to love her. When Scripture says he spoke “tenderly” to her, the Hebrew word לֵב [H3820] lēḇ (lave) means the inner person, mind, heart, will, conscious understanding. Therefore, the Hebrew literally means that Shechem attempted to speak to Dinah’s heart, the inner most part of who she is, with the hope of her understanding his words. However, that action should have preceded the action of sexual intercourse. And because Shechem defied GOD’s design, he defiled Dinah.

In 34:4, Shechem spoke to his father, Hamor, and requested that he acquire Dinah to be his wife. In 35:5, Jacob heard that Dinah had been defiled. Scripture doesn’t state how Jacob heard, but it seems likely that Dinah went back home and shared the horrible news with her father. However, because his sons were tending livestock in a field, Jacob decided to stay silent until his sons returned home. According to James 1:19-20, Jacob’s initial silence seems to be wise, for it is written, “19 But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; 20 for the anger of man does not achieve the righteousness of God.”

In Genesis 34:6-10, Hamor went to Jacob in order to arrange a marriage between Shechem and Dinah. By this point, Jacob’s sons had also heard the news and arrived, extremely angry. In Hamor’s negotiation for marriage on behalf of his son, he presented an offer of intermarriage, saying, “give your daughters to us and take our daughters for yourselves.” The end goal of this deal would be to unite as one large tribe who would share all the land and resources within the land, thus ensuring their strength and survival. In 34:11-12, Shechem added that he would do whatever it takes and pay any price as long as he could have Dinah as his wife. Though a bride price was typical in the Ancient Near East, it is written in Song of Solomon 8:7 that money cannot purchase love. And how could Dinah ever love the man who raped her? How could Dinah’s father and brothers ever allow her rapist to purchase her? Because Shechem had defiled Dinah, in Genesis 34:13-17, Jacob’s sons answered Shechem and his father with deceit, telling them that they would only be able to agree to this deal if all males from their tribe became circumcised as they were, because uncircumcision was a disgrace to them. The Hebrew word for “deceit” is מִרְמָה [H4820] mirmâ (meer-maw’), which means deception with a malicious motive. This is the same word used in 27:35 when Isaac told Esau, “Your brother came deceitfully and has taken away your blessing.” Certainly, Jacob had once been known as a deceiver, but now his sons are far surpassing any deceitful ploy Jacob ever did because their motive in their deception is much darker than anything Jacob ever planned.

Surprisingly, in 34:18, the counteroffer Jacob’s sons presented seemed good and reasonable to both Hamor and Shechem. Now, I can understand why it might have seemed reasonable to Shechem since his desire to have Dinah was so strong, but I am surprised that his father, Hamor, would also believe the demand to be reasonable. What did Hamor have to gain from getting circumcised? But then 34:19-24 reveals an even greater surprise in that the entire tribe agrees to this demand as well. However, the details within those verses explains why they all agreed to the demand of circumcision. In 34:19, Scripture reveals that Shechem was the most respected person in his father’s household. Why? Well, 34:2 informs us that Shechem was “the prince of the land”. But if Shechem was the prince of the land, then it is reasonable to believe that his father, Hamor, was the king or chief of the land. And in 34:20-24, both Hamor and Shechem convinced their people that not only would they receive Jacob’s daughters for their wives, but all of Jacob’s livestock and property would become their own, and by becoming one large tribe, they would become stronger, which would better ensure their safety and survival from potential enemies. Thus, Scripture reveals a picture of deceit from both sides: Jacob’s sons have ulterior motives for convincing Hamor’s tribe to get circumcised; likewise, Hamor’s tribe has ulterior motives for allowing Jacob’s tribe to unite with them. Thus, this tense scenario is like watching two spiders who desire to eat each other – who will initiate the first move of attack and who will be consumed?

In 34:25-26, on the third day after Hamor’s tribe circumcised themselves, while they were still in pain, Simeon and Levi went through the city and killed every male of Hamor’s tribe with the sword. But why did they kill all of the males? Why not just Shechem? We truly don’t know the character of any of those males who got killed, but if Shechem was the prince of the land and his father, Hamor, was the king/chief of the land, then it would have been too risky to keep the other males alive. However, this was an evil deed because circumcision was the sign of the covenant between GOD and His people that would bring divine blessing (17:10-14). The only people who should be circumcised are those who worship GOD (YHWH) and acknowledge Abraham as their father in the faith. While Jacob’s sons were right to insist that circumcision would be necessary in order for both tribes to become one people, their decision to keep GOD out of their plans was wrong. So, not only did Jacob’s sons instruct Hamor’s tribe to do what GOD never commanded them to do, but then Simeon and Levi murdered all the males who received GOD’s covenant. But why did Simeon and Levi murder the males with the sword? Simeon was son #2 and Levi was son #3, both of them brothers to Dinah, sharing Leah as their mother.

After killing Hamor and Shechem, it is written that they took Dinah from Shechem’s house. This means that Dinah had been used as bait, living with Shechem in his house for at least three days until her brothers came and removed her from his house. Though it is almost certain that Shechem didn’t have another opportunity to rape her again due to him being circumcised and in pain, she still lived with her rapist for at least three days. In addition to the trauma Dinah experienced from being raped and then having to live with her rapist for at least three days, she also witnessed Shechem get killed by the sword. Through all of this, the true victim in this scenario had been overlooked; Dinah was neither consulted nor comforted. Can you imagine the trauma Dinah experienced?

In 34:27-29, the remainder of Jacob’s sons went through the city and took plunder from all the slain. In 34:23, Hamor’s tribe had schemed to take all of Jacob’s livestock, but in 34:28-29, in a great reversal, Jacob’s sons took not only all of Hamor’s livestock, but also the surviving children and females. Thus, many Hivites became absorbed into the tribe of Jacob.

In 34:30, angry with Simeon and Levi, Jacob told them that their actions caused the tribe of Jacob to be hated among the inhabitants of the land, among the Canaanites and the Perizzites. Further, believing that the other inhabitants would wage war against them, Jacob feared that they would be destroyed and erased from history. However, because Jacob had remained silent and never took action, Jacob’s sons challenged his leadership and authority and asked their father in 34:31, “Should he treat our sister as a harlot?” However, Jacob does not answer. Perhaps the inspired Scripture ends with Jacob’s silence as a reminder that Jacob’s failure to intervene at an earlier stage may have contributed to the outcome. Regardless, his silence seems to fit his character and calls to remembrance what is written in 25:27: “When the boys grew up, Esau became a skillful hunter, a man of the field, but Jacob was a peaceful man, living in tents.”

  • Genesis 34 is an often overlooked, avoided, and rarely discussed chapter in the Bible, but Dinah deserves some time for dedicated discussion. This entire chapter was included in the Holy Spirit inspired Scriptures as a dedication to Dinah due to the devastation and division caused by the lack of devotion to Dinah and her defilement. I, for one, am in absolute awe that the Lord loved Dinah so much that He made certain that her story would be included in sacred Scripture. But what about you? Do you truly comprehend how much love the Lord had for Dinah?
  • In 34:1-2, Dinah got raped by Shechem because she had most likely put herself in a dangerous situation due to lacking both situational awareness and self-defense training. But what about you? Do you go to places you ought not go? Even if you travel to places that are common, do you travel alone and make yourself vulnerable to attack? Are you aware of your surroundings at all times? Have you been trained in any type of self-defense course?
  • Have you been a victim of rape? If so, have you received counseling? Have you been able to heal both emotionally and spiritually?
  • Do the exegeted details of 34:3 help you to better understand the depth beyond the surface of sexual intercourse? Are you able to better understand GOD’s design of two becoming one?
  • Because Jacob remained silent and failed to follow through with any fatherly leadership (34:5), his sons decided to take matters into their own hands and they conjured up a plan to murder the tribe of Hamor (34:13-29). How would you have responded if you were Jacob?
  • Shechem freely chose to rape a woman named Dinah; consequently, Jacob’s sons murdered the entire tribe connected with Shechem and then captured all remaining children and females, absorbing them into their own tribe. Can you see how far the reach of sin can go? Do you understand how destructive sin can be when we allow sin to be master over us?
  • Are you able to put yourself in the place of Dinah and understand how she might have felt? Dinah had been a victim, but Jacob’s sons created multiple new victims by capturing the children and females alive. The children most likely witnessed their fathers get murdered. The females most likely witnessed their husbands get murdered. Are you able to put yourself in the place of all the children and females who got captured and understand how they might have felt?
  • In 34:31, Jacob’s sons essentially presented the argument that their actions of murdering the tribe of Hamor was justified due to Shechem defiling Dinah and treating her as if she had been a harlot. Though this type of behavior was common in the Ancient Near East, do you believe that their actions were justified? Why or why not?
  • As Christians within the new covenant, what does the Word tell us regarding seeking revenge?
  • As the chronological story of the Bible continues, we will see that Dinah is never mentioned again and that she faded into oblivion. But even when everyone else seems to forget, GOD remembers. When no one seems to notice, GOD notices. When no one else seems to care, GOD cares. When you feel all alone, GOD is present. Think: GOD’s love is the reason this chapter is dedicated to Dinah. So, what does GOD want us to learn from Dinah’s drama? First, we must not allow sexual passion to boil over into evil actions. Passion must be controlled. Sexual sin is devastating because of its eternal consequences (1Corinthians 6:15-20; 10:8-13). Second, we are called to overcome evil by doing good (Romans 12:21). Third, we are to love our enemies (Matthew 5:38-48; Luke 6:27-36). Fourth, we are not to seek revenge because GOD is the Avenger (Deuteronomy 32:35; Romans 12:17-19; Matthew 26:52).

WHO’S YOUR DADDY?
(Genesis 35:1-27)

In Genesis 34, Jacob failed to lead as a father after his daughter Dinah got raped; consequently, Jacob’s sons decided to take matters into their own hands and they murdered Hamor’s entire tribe and then looted the city. As a result, Jacob feared that the other inhabitants of the land would join forces to kill him and his entire tribe. However, in 35:1, GOD the Father does not fail to lead and He instructs Jacob to return to Bethel, dwell there, and make an altar there to Him who appeared to Jacob 20 years ago after he fled from his brother, Esau. Now, if you remember, in 28:15, the Lord said to Jacob, “Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land; for I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.” But what was “this” land? Bethel – the location where the Lord revealed Himself to Jacob in the vision of the stairway to Heaven.

So, in 35:2-3, encouraged and emboldened by his encounter with the Lord, Jacob commands his tribe to get rid of the foreign “gods” among them, to purify themselves, change their garments, and then after doing so, they would all travel to Bethel in order to make an altar to his GOD who has been with him through everything and never left him. And surprisingly, in 35:4, everyone falls into line and acts in faithful obedience to Jacob’s command once again: “So they gave to Jacob all the foreign gods which they had and the rings which were in their ears, and Jacob hid them under the oak which was near Shechem.”

Now, this oak tree is likely the same “oak of Moreh” (mo-reyh’) mentioned in 12:6 when Abram traveled to the “site of Shechem” where the Lord appeared to Abram and promised him that the land would belong to his descendants, and then Abram built an altar there to the Lord. But why did Jacob’s entire tribe have to be told to get rid of the foreign “gods” among them? Well, evidently the foreign “gods” Rachel stole from Laban (31:19) were still with her, but it’s also likely that some of the foreign “gods” came from the plunder they took after murdering Hamor’s tribe and looting the city (34:25-29). But Jacob commanded his tribe to get rid of those idols.

The burial of these idols at Shechem may be symbolically significant, implying that the wicked actions of Simeon and Levi reflect the influence of polytheism. In fact, later on in our chronological journey, we will see in 1Corinthians 10:20-22 that Paul says, “20 the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons and not to God; and I do not want you to become sharers in demons. 21 You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons. 22 Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? We are not stronger than He, are we?” Therefore, Jacob was preparing his family to properly worship the Lord for when they arrive in Bethel.

In Genesis 34:30, Jacob worried that all the other inhabitants of the land would unite together to kill him and his entire tribe; however, 35:5 states that GOD had placed a great terror upon all the surrounding cities so that they did not pursue Jacob’s tribe as they traveled. So, in 35:6-7, Jacob and his tribe arrive in Luz (which will later become known as Bethel) and Jacob builds and altar there, calling the place “El-bethel” (which means “God of Bethel”, or “The God of the house of God”). In 28:18, Jacob had only constructed a pillar to GOD, but now he constructs an altar to GOD, revealing a personal relationship with the Lord and acknowledging how GOD has been faithful to him.

Now, in 35:8, the narration seems to be abruptly interrupted and says, “Now Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, died, and she was buried below Bethel under the oak; it was named Allon-bacuth” [al-lone’ baw-kooth’] (which means “oak of weeping”). But why is the death of Rebekah’s nurse mentioned yet the death of Rebekah is never mentioned? Why was there never any weeping for Rebekah mentioned? And why was Rebekah’s nurse with Jacob anyway? In 24:59, Rebekah’s nurse is briefly mentioned, yet without name. Here, a name of the nurse has been given as Deborah. It’s possible that her presence with Jacob suggests that she had been sent to him by Rebekah in fulfillment of her promise in 27:45 when she said, “I will send and get you from there”. Nevertheless, Scripture is silent on the matter and so all guesses are mere conjecture. However, one thing seems to be certain: the narration regarding Deborah’s burial is not an abrupt interruption; rather, it is a continuation of the previous narration and showcases a stark contrast to the burial of the false “gods”. No tears were shed while burying the false “gods”; to be rid of those false “gods” is a good riddance. However, there was weeping involved in Deborah’s death.

In 35:9-10, it is written that GOD blessed Jacob. This not only confirms the blessing he received from the Lord in his wrestling match in 32:29, but more importantly, it places Jacob on a par with Abraham and Isaac, of whom similar affirmations were also made (24:1; 25:11). Not only did GOD bless Jacob, but He also reminded him that his name was no longer Jacob, but Israel. So, not only did GOD bring Israel back to the place where he first encountered the Lord (28:10-22), but GOD made it known that the GOD of Bethel is the same GOD who gave Israel his new identity back in 32:24-32 after wrestling with Jacob and dislocating the socket of his thigh. Therefore, the Lord who revealed Himself at the top of the stairway to Heaven is the same Lord who wrestled with Jacob and gave him his new name of Israel. But in 35:11, GOD gives Israel a new name by which he can call the Lord: El Shaddai (which means, “God Almighty” or “God most powerful”). And this is how GOD revealed Himself to Abraham in 17:5-6, and also how Isaac referred to GOD in 28:3-4 when he blessed Jacob. And continuing in 35:11-12, GOD Almighty says to Israel, “11 Be fruitful and multiply; A nation and a company of nations shall come from you, And kings shall come forth from you. 12 “The land which I gave to Abraham and Isaac, I will give it to you, And I will give the land to your descendants after you.”

When GOD said, “Be fruitful and multiply”, it was the same command GOD gave to Adam and Eve (1:28) and Noah and his sons (9:1), but it was also the blessing Isaac spoke to Jacob before he fled from his brother (28:3). And when GOD said that nations and kings would come from him, that was the same promise GOD gave to Abraham (17:6,16). Therefore, GOD declares that Israel is indeed the one who will continue what GOD started through Abraham.

In 35:13-16, after GOD finished speaking, Israel set up a pillar, anointed it with oil, and then the entire tribe of Israel continued on their journey toward Ephrath (ef-rawth’). However, on the way, Rachel began to give birth, but she had great difficulty and suffered severely through her labor. In 35:17, a midwife said to her, “Do not fear, for now you have another son.” In fact, the birth of this son was exactly what Rachel had desired. In 30:23-24, after giving birth to Joseph, believing that GOD had taken away her reproach, she named her son Joseph, saying, “May the Lord give me another son” because the meaning of “Joseph” is “may he add”, which implied that her prayer was for GOD to give her yet another son. Therefore, this new son was the answer to Rachel’s prayer.

However, 35:18 says that Rachel’s “soul” departed from her body while giving birth. The Hebrew word translated here as “soul” is the same word that had been used in 2:7 when GOD gave Adam the breath of life and he became a “living being”. The Hebrew word is נֶפֶשׁ [H5315] nep̄hešh (neh’-fesh), which means soul, self, life, the inner being of a person, mind, living being, creature, desire, emotion, passion, activity of the mind, will, character, that which breathes, that which possesses the breath of life. This is the same word that had been used in 1:20,21,24,30 which describes all sea, land, and air animals that possess breath. Thus, Rachel breathed her last breath and her body died while giving birth to this new son. However, in her last moments, she named her son ben-‘ônî (bane-o-nee’), which means “son of my sorrow”. But Israel quickly changed the name of his son and called him binyāmîn (bin-yaw-meen’) [or, Benjamin], which means “son of the right hand”, which indicates a place of honor and status. In fact, Jewish commentators note that this name indicates that Benjamin was Israel’s favorite son and that this is consistent with the favoritism shown to both of Rachel’s sons. And later on in our chronological journey, we will see that in a different time period, Psalm 110 will show a similar meaning for this idiom. Therefore, Israel refused to allow Benjamin to be blamed for the death of Rachel and have that horrible character trait follow him his entire life; instead, Israel celebrated the fact that even through death another life came into existence.

But was Benjamin to blame for Rachel’s death? No; in fact, Genesis 30:1 says, “when Rachel saw that she bore Jacob no children, she became jealous of her sister; and she said to Jacob, ‘Give me children, or else I die.’ ” And in 31:32, after Rachel stole Laban’s “gods”, Jacob had said to Laban, “The one with whom you find your gods shall not live”. Consequently, Rachel’s death was ironic because she did not die because she had no children; rather, she died while giving birth to a child. Further, Rachel’s death seems to be fulfillment of Jacob’s curse because Rachel had been guilty of stealing Laban’s “gods” and they were in her possession at the time of Jacob’s curse.

Therefore, 35:19 says, “Rachel died and was buried on the way to Ephrath (that is, Bethlehem).” So, Luz later becomes known as Bethel (35:6); likewise, Ephrath will later become known as Bethlehem. Because these minor and seemingly insignificant details will become important later on, we must notate them now so that we will remember them later on when these details arise again.

In 35:20, Jacob set up a pillar over Rachel’s grave, and then 35:21 says they all continued on their journey until Israel stopped and pitched his tent beyond מִגְדַּל־עֵדֶר [H4029] miḡdal-ʿēḏer (mig-dal’-ay’-der), which means “tower of the flock”, indicating that it was a shepherd’s watchtower near Ephrath (Bethlehem).

And then 35:22 seems to once again abruptly interrupt the narration and states, “It came about while Israel was dwelling in that land, that Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father’s concubine, and Israel heard of it.” But why so abrupt? Why had evil infiltrated at this time? Why Reuben? Why Bilhah? Well, Dinah had recently been raped (34:2), Israel heard about that yet he failed to take action (34:5), and so Israel’s sons bypassed the authority of their father and took matters into their own hands, murdering all males of Hamor’s tribe, and looted the city (34:13-17,25-29). Further, Rachel had just died (35:18) and they were all traveling without knowing what to expect. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that everyone had been overwhelmed by emotions and most likely filled with anxiety/stress. But the fact that Reuben had sexual relations with his father’s concubine showcases his lack of respect toward his father. Possession of the concubines that belonged to the head of the tribe was presumably a sign of leadership in the tribe. Typically, when the father died, the care and ownership of the concubines (as part of his property) passed to the next head of the tribe. But to seize ownership of the concubines prior to the father’s death would be understood as an act of subversion and disrespect (comparable to seizing land or herds), but would not be unusual if succession to tribe leadership were contested. In this context, Reuben’s offense against his father circumvented proper succession procedures and implies that his father was powerless. Regardless of motive, this act was not as abrupt as it may seem while reading the text; rather, this had been building up like a volcano ready to erupt ever since Israel failed to lead as a father when Dinah got raped.

Reuben was the firstborn and Bilhah had been Rachel’s maid. Therefore, it is likely that because Rachel was no longer around to watch over Bilhah and keep her held accountable, Bilhah seized the opportunity to pursue either pleasure or purpose for herself. But why Reuben? I believe it is reasonable to assume that because he was the firstborn, this was in some way an act of rebellion against Israel on Reuben’s part and a prideful expression of his own authority as the rightful heir and future leader of the tribe. And because Reuben was the oldest son, he would have been the one closest in age to Bilhah. Now, we cannot know for certain, but Bilhah could have chosen to have sexual relations with Reuben because she knew he was the firstborn; consequently, it’s possible that Bilhah had hopes of becoming the main woman/wife of the new future tribe. However, it’s also possible that there existed no ulterior motives other than the primal pursuit of pleasure at the expense of purpose and that they had both been merely led by lust. However, this was not only a great sin against Israel, but also against two of Reuben’s brothers because Bilhah was the mother of Dan and Naphtali (30:4-8). But 35:22 states that Israel heard about this great sin and yet Scripture does not state that Israel did anything about it. And so Israel not only failed to take action against the great sin against Dinah being raped, but now he fails to take action against this great sin of Reuben having sexual intercourse with Bilhah.

And because this great sin involves multiple people, 35:23-26 explains once again the relation between all children in Israel’s tribe. But due to the birth of Benjamin, this list is now updated and complete:

LEAH

ZILPAH

RACHEL

BILHAH

Reuben (01)

Gad (07)

Joseph (11)

Dan (05)

Simeon (02)

Asher (08)

Benjamin (12)

Naphtali (06)

Levi (03)

Judah (04)

Issachar (09)

Zebulun (10)

[Dinah]

In conclusion to this new drama, 35:27 says, “Jacob came to his father Isaac at Mamre [mam-ray’] of Kiriath-arba (that is, Hebron), where Abraham and Isaac had sojourned.” Again, the minor details that seem insignificant should be noted. Mamre was a site near Hebron where Abraham had settled (13:18; 14:13; 18:1) and where Isaac also later lived. The land of Kiriath-arba will later be known as Hebron. So, this one chapter (chapter 35) identifies three locations while clarifying their updated/current names, which indicates the time period it was written – the author wrote at a later time and explained what happened in the past. Therefore, GOD brought Israel to Hebron, which connected him with Abraham and Isaac, highlighting the fact that through Israel the continuance of GOD’s ultimate plan will be fulfilled.

However, a minor detail in 35:27 also reveals yet another omittance of Rebekah. An examination of Scripture reveals that Rebekah was omitted in chapter 30 (14 years after Jacob had fled from Esau), and she was omitted in 31:18 (20 years after Jacob had fled from Esau). Moreover, in 35:8, Scripture mentions the death of Rebekah’s nurse (Deborah) and the weeping that happened due to her death, but no mention is made of Rebekah’s death or any weeping that happened due to her death. And finally, 35:27 only mentions Israel’s father, Isaac, but Rebekah is omitted. And because Rebekah was omitted from all accounts, I think it is reasonable to believe that not only had Rebekah died long ago, but Scripture does not honor her for some reason. But what reason would that be? Well, the last bit of information we knew about Rebekah is that she favored Jacob over Esau and convinced Jacob to deceive his father / her husband Isaac in order to steal the blessing that rightfully belonged to her firstborn, Esau. Consequently, Rebekah might have been omitted because she was not honored. However, Scripture is silent on the matter and so that thought must remain as mere conjecture.

In summary, the sons of Israel disrespected and dishonored their earthly father, but Israel desired to revere and honor his Father in Heaven. And despite the dysfunction within Israel’s family, GOD still chose the Israelites to be His chosen people by which He will accomplish His ultimate plan for His creation. This chapter highlights how life here on this earth can seem to be falling apart, while all the divine pieces in the spiritual realm are falling into place. Even though everything seemed to be going wrong, GOD was causing all things to work together for good, for those who love Him, for those who are called according to His purpose (Romans 8:28).

  • In Genesis 35:2, Israel commanded his family to get rid of their idols. Unless we, also, get rid of the idols in our lives, they can divert our focus and ruin our relationship with the Lord. Sadly, many people proclaim belief in GOD while at the same time showcasing loyalty to idols. Many people acknowledge GOD without living rightly for GOD. Is that you? Do you claim GOD while living a life of idolatry? An idol is anything that replaces the One true GOD in priority and position. Idolatry extends beyond the worship of idols and images and false gods. Our modern idols are many and varied. Even for those who do not physically bow before a statue, idolatry is a matter of the heart — pride, self-centeredness, greed, gluttony, a love for possessions and ultimately rebellion against GOD in any act of unfaithfulness. Are you placing anything or anyone above GOD in priority and/or position? Money? Pornography? Drugs? Alcohol? A sports team or player? A singer or musician? A social media platform? Who or what is receiving your devotion at the time when you should be devoted to the Lord and His Word? Are you merely acknowledging GOD but not living for GOD according to His will?
  • In 35:10, GOD reminded Israel of his new identity – he is someone who will not let go of the Lord until he is blessed; he is someone who holds onto the Lord while the Lord showcases His power on Israel’s behalf. Although everything seemed to be falling apart, GOD reminds Israel that with the Lord everything will fall into place. This was a reminder that Israel needed to keep his eyes on the Lord and obey His commands despite what things might look like in the flesh while in this physical world. Many people wrongly believe that Christianity should enable a life free from problems while only being blessed. As a negative consequence to this wrong belief, many people become disillusioned and abandon The Way and walk away from the Lord, disheartened and disappointed. Instead, we need to learn from Israel and become determined not to let go of the Lord until we receive the Lord’s blessing. However, we typically do not ever receive the Lord’s blessing until we endure the storms of life and prevail in holding on to the Lord. Problems and difficulties in this life here on this earth are inevitable and unavoidable; therefore, we might as well view them as opportunities for growth. After all, how can we prevail unless we have a problem to prevail over? If GOD says He is El Shaddai – GOD Almighty – and that nothing is too difficult for Him (18:14), do you believe Him or not? Who’s your daddy? Is He a good Father, or not (Psalm 103:13)?

Chronological-012

Chronological Study (011/365)

Genesis 30:25 – 31:55


GETTING CARRIED AWAY

In Genesis 30:25, not long after Rachel gave birth to Joseph, Jacob presents a request to Laban to be released from his servitude so that he can finally return to his own country. This means that Jacob has already completed 14 years of servitude. [Interestingly, Scripture is still silent regarding Rebekah; it’s been 14 years and yet Rebekah has still not sent for Jacob to return, as she said she would do (27:45). So, is Rebekah still alive? Scripture is silent on the matter.] In 30:27, Laban responds to Jacob by saying, “stay with me; I have divined that the Lord has blessed me on your account.” So, not only is Laban selfish, thinking only of himself, but he attempts to use the Lord’s name (YHWH) as leverage for his benefit even though he confesses that he learned this information via divination, which the Lord hates and will later command not to do (Leviticus 19:26; Deuteronomy 18:10). The conversation just started and it already veered off course in the wrong direction.

In Genesis 30:28, Laban says, “Name me your wages, and I will give it.” However, Jacob already named his wage and it was the wage of freedom to build his own life with his own family. In 30:30, Jacob essentially tells Laban that it’s true that the Lord has blessed Laban because of the Lord’s favor on himself, but it’s time to provide for his own family. In 30:31-32, ignoring Jacob’s request to be sent off, Laban asks, “What shall I give you?” Jacob replies by saying, “31 You shall not give me anything. If you will do this one thing for me, I will again pasture and keep your flock: 32 let me pass through your entire flock today, removing from there every speckled and spotted sheep and every black one among the lambs and the spotted and speckled among the goats; and such shall be my wages.”

Jacob’s response of “You shall not give me anything” reminds me of 14:23 when Abraham told the king of Sodom, “I will not take a thread or a sandal thong or anything that is yours, for fear you would say, ‘I have made Abram rich.’ ” Instead, Jacob states that he will continue to stay and serve if he can have all the animals that have blemishes. But why did Jacob change his mind so quickly and make such an odd request? Because Scripture is setting the stage once again. Jacob knows something that we (the readers) don’t yet know.

In 30:34-36, Laban schemes with his young sons and then “he put a distance of three days’ journey between himself and Jacob, and Jacob fed the rest of Laban’s flocks.” And so it seems as if Laban has deceived Jacob yet again, not allowing Jacob to find any blemished animals for him to receive because Laban gave all those animals to his sons. If those animals belong to his sons, then Jacob would not be able to remove them from Laban’s flocks because they no longer belong to him but to his sons. However, what follows in 30:37-43 is a bizarre tactic that leads to unusual breeding of Laban’s animals. And it is at this point in the story that the typical unbelieving critic usually claims that the Bible is either teaching an unscientific view that prenatal influence affects the physical characteristics of the unborn, or that Jacob is using magic. Scripture does state that Jacob placing stripped rods before the animals during mating leads to the newborns having streaks, specks, or spots; however, Scripture does not assert that the action Jacob performed is the cause of the animals having blemishes. In fact, Jacob later reveals to Rachel and Leah in 31:9-12 that GOD showed him to do this, that GOD saw all the wrong Laban had done to Jacob, and so GOD decided to take away from Laban and give to Jacob. Therefore, the bizarre action was not the scientific cause for the newborns having blemishes; rather, Jacob’s faith led him to take action (as bizarre as it was), and then GOD produced the results because of Jacob’s faithful obedience. Later on, we will see another similar example of this in John 9:6-7 when Jesus will spit on the ground, form some clay, rub it in a man’s eyes, instructs him to go wash in some water, and then the man becomes healed and can see, no longer blind. Neither the action of rubbing clay in eyes nor washing with water are scientific causes of the man being healed of blindness; rather, the man’s faith led him to take action, and then GOD produced results because of that man’s faithful obedience.

As time went on, Laban’s sons complained that Jacob was stealing all of their father’s wealth (Genesis 31:1), even though they had been guilty of stealing all the blemished animals from Jacob. Jacob then discerned that Laban’s attitude toward him had changed, becoming unfriendly (31:2). “Then the Lord said to Jacob, ‘Return to the land of your fathers and to your relatives, and I will be with you’ ” (31:3).

In 31:4-16, Jacob explains to Rachel and Leah that Laban’s attitude is now hostile; moreover, Laban has changed his wages along the way and has cheated him ten times over. He then explains how the Lord has decided to take away from Laban and chose to bless him with all that the Lord took away from Laban. This outcome showcases fulfillment of what Isaac prophesied over Jacob in 27:29 when he said, “Cursed be those who curse you, And blessed be those who bless you.” And ultimately, this fulfillment comes from the promise GOD gave to Abraham in 12:3. Indeed, Laban admitted that he had been blessed because of Jacob (30:27), but now he is under a curse due to the wickedness of his actions against Jacob. And finally, Jacob explained how the Lord told him to leave and return to the land of his birth. In response, Rachel and Leah said that they have no inheritance, their own father has considered them to be as foreigners, and they’re still hurt by the fact that he sold them to Jacob yet kept and used all wealth of the bride price for himself. The bride price paid by the groom was often transferred to the bride as an indirect dowry. As such, it became part of a financial reserve for the woman that served as an insurance policy of sorts. This claim suggests that Rachel and Leah had neither direct nor indirect dowry (their share of the inheritance); therefore, no financial security would have been assigned to their present or future holdings. Laban alone profited from Jacob’s labor, meaning that he had, in effect, simply sold his daughters for profit as if they were slaves and not his daughters. And so Rachel and Leah conclude by saying, “Surely all the wealth which God has taken away from our father belongs to us and our children; now then, do whatever God has said to you.” And of course, this only confirms Laban’s greed, which was first seen in 24:30-31 when he set his greedy eyes on the valuables Eliezer brought with him.

In 31:13, the Lord said to Jacob, “I am the God of Bethel, where you anointed a pillar, where you made a vow to Me.” But why did the Lord have to say that to Jacob? Well, in 31:4, while talking to Rachel and Leah, Jacob described the Lord as “the God of my father”. Thus, it is evident that Jacob has still not made a permanent commitment for the Lord to be his GOD. If you remember, in 28:15, the Lord told Jacob He would be with him, protect him, and bring him back to his own country. And in 28:20-21, Jacob said YHWH would be his GOD if he returns to his father’s house safely. Further, the Lord was making it known to Jacob that He is not a limited god confined to one location, but He is in all places. Interestingly, the One who said “I am the God of Bethel” is described as “the angel of God” in 31:11. But how could GOD be viewed as an angel of GOD? That had been discussed in Part 006/365 of our chronological journey in our discussion about Theophany.

In 31:18, it is written that Jacob set out “to go to the land of Canaan to his father Isaac.” And so yet again, Rebekah is omitted from Scripture. [It now seems likely that Rebekah might already be dead at this point in the story.]

In 31:19, it is written that Rachel stole her father’s “household idols”, which is the Hebrew word תְּרָפִים [H8655] terāp̄îm (ter-aw-feem’), which comes from the root word רָפָא [H7495] rāp̄ā’ (raw-faw’), which describes the action of being healed or to be healthy. And because Laban identifies these idols as his “gods” in 31:30, these “household idols” were most likely small figurines positioned throughout the home that were supposed to provide good health for the people who lived in that home. Not only does stealing these idols reveal bad character for Rachel, but it also reinforces the fact that Laban is certainly unfaithful to the Lord and is an idolater as well as someone who practices divination (30:27). But why did Rachel steal her father’s idols? What was her motive and reasoning behind the theft? It’s possible she could have done it out from spite, hoping to hurt her father, but it’s also possible that she could have considered their monetary value and had plans to sell them later. However, it is also possible that she had been an idolater herself, unfaithful to the Lord, and had been attached to false gods with the hope of them bringing her good fortune and/or health benefits. As we will later see, her entire family was polytheistic (35:2; Joshua 24:2). Regardless, in Genesis 31:20-21, Jacob and his entire family flee in secret, without telling Laban they were leaving. But why wouldn’t they tell Laban? Because they all knew Laban’s character by that point. Wisdom tells us that a fool does not delight in understanding, but is only interested in speaking his/her own mind; there’s no reason to speak to a fool, for that person will despise words of wisdom, and so a wise person should leave the presence of a fool (Proverbs 14:7-8; 18:2; 23:9). Laban’s character was so poor, in fact, that he didn’t even notice they were all missing until three days later! It is written in Genesis 31:22 that Jacob had distanced himself a three-day journey before Laban discovered that he left. This is poetic payback from when Laban had distanced the blemished animals from Jacob by a three-day journey (30:36). However, by the time Laban caught up with Jacob, he traveled a total of seven days (31:23); therefore, a total of ten days passed between Jacob’s departure and Laban confronting Jacob. But prior to Laban confronting Jacob, GOD spoke to Laban in a dream the night before and told him, “Be careful that you do not speak to Jacob either good or bad” (31:24). Yet again, GOD’s timing is precise, speaking to Laban only hours before the confrontation. However, even though GOD warned Laban not to speak to Jacob, he still chose to confront Jacob and speak to him, directly disobeying the Lord’s command.

Examine Laban’s words in 31:26-30: “26 Then Laban said to Jacob, ‘What have you done by deceiving me and carrying away my daughters like captives of the sword? 27 Why did you flee secretly and deceive me, and did not tell me so that I might have sent you away with joy and with songs, with timbrel and with lyre; 28 and did not allow me to kiss my sons and my daughters? Now you have done foolishly. 29 It is in my power to do you harm, but the God of your father spoke to me last night, saying, “Be careful not to speak either good or bad to Jacob.” 30 Now you have indeed gone away because you longed greatly for your father’s house; but why did you steal my gods?’ ”

Ten times Laban placed the focus on himself. [And if you remember, this is the same pride we witnessed from Cain and Lamech in 4:9-15,23-24. i.e., me, me me, I, I, I – priiiiiide.] This explains why Jacob said Laban had cheated him ten times (31:7). And it took ten days for Laban to confront Jacob, only to place the focus on himself ten times. And the fact that Laban claims to have other gods explains why he didn’t completely obey the Lord’s command not to speak with Jacob. In Biblical numerology, the number 10 is sometimes viewed as a complete and perfect numeral (as is 3, 7 and 12). The number 10 is made up of 4, which represents the physical creation, and 6, which symbolizes man. As such, the meaning of 10 is one of testimony, law, responsibility and the completeness of order. And because the number 10 is used to describe Laban placing the focus on himself, cheating Jacob, and pursuing Jacob, Scripture seems to inform us that Laban was completely out of order, rebelling against GOD’s will.

When Laban claimed that Jacob carried away his daughters as if taking them captive by force, he is ignorant to the fact that his daughters felt as if he were the slave owner and they were his captives because they had no inheritance, he treated them like foreigners, and he sold them as if they were slaves (31:14-16). When Laban expressed anger about being deceived or outwitted, this is also poetic payback and a great reversal in yet another wrestling match. Laban had outwitted Jacob in the beginning, but then in a reversal, Jacob ended up outwitting Laban, taking his daughters and great wealth from his flocks. Laban claimed that Jacob didn’t tell him that he wanted to leave and that if he had, he would have sent him away with a joyful celebration, yet Jacob had told Laban his desire to leave in 30:25-26,30-31, yet Laban ignored his request due to his greed. And for that reason, GOD saw Laban’s wickedness (31:12) and decided to take from Laban and give to Jacob (31:9). Laban claimed that Jacob acted foolishly, yet Jacob did exactly what GOD commanded him to do – to leave (31:3,13) – whereas Laban disobeyed GOD’s command not to speak to Jacob (31:24). Laban claimed that it was in his power to harm Jacob, yet Scripture states that GOD prevented Laban from causing any harm to Jacob (31:7,24). And finally, Laban’s prideful rant ends with a confession of idolatry in that he claims multiple gods. In fact, if we are to believe the testimonies of Rachel and Leah along with the inspired words in Scripture regarding Laban’s character, Laban’s concern about his idols might have been the true motive for pursuing Jacob. Jacob was the only reason Laban had been blessed, but then Jacob departed; in addition, Laban also discovered that his idols were missing. Therefore, I think it is reasonable to believe that Laban wasn’t concerned about his daughters or grandchildren; rather, I believe Laban had only been concerned about his own blessings.

Now, when Laban said in 31:26, “What have you done by deceiving me”, the word translated as “deceiving” is from the Hebrew word גָּנַב [H1589] gānaḇ (gaw-nab’), which means to steal and to carry away. Although not immediately obvious from the English translation, this Hebrew idiom connects the dots between Laban stealing seven more years of servitude from Jacob, Laban stealing the blemished animals from Jacob, Rachel stealing Laban’s idols, Jacob stealing Laban’s daughters and wealth, and how Jacob’s blessing was due to the Lord taking from Laban and giving to Jacob. This entire section is centered around everything being carried away, and it will conclude with the Lord carrying Jacob away from Laban to the birth of his country.

In 31:32, Jacob, not knowing that Rachel had stolen Laban’s idols (31:19), boldly states that he did not steal Laban’s idols and that if anyone has them, that person will die. Rachel hides them in her camel’s saddle, sits on it, and then states that she doesn’t want to get up due to experiencing pain from her regular menstrual discharge of blood (31:34-35). And because a woman’s monthly period was considered impure, Laban would have willingly avoided the object Rachel was sitting on. However, by Rachel sitting on the idols, her action shows that she does not revere these idols as real gods. Further, her refusal to confess and return the idols to Laban reveals the disdain she has toward her father, which she already expressed (31:14-16). Thus, I think it is reasonable to believe that Rachel’s true motive for stealing the idols was to hurt her father out of spite. And the fact that Scripture describes Rachel sitting on these idols emphasizes the total impotence of any such false gods. No real God would ever allow a human to dishonor or blaspheme it by permitting that human to sit on it – especially a woman during her menstrual discharge of blood. Therefore, Scripture describes the false gods as being even more impure than a woman’s menstrual discharge.

In 31:36-42, after Laban’s search ends in vain, Jacob then becomes angry and contends that he has remained a hard worker who was faithful for 20 years, bearing every loss unto himself, even though Laban cheated him the entire time, concluding by saying, “42 If the God of my father, the God of Abraham, and the fear of Isaac, had not been for me, surely now you would have sent me away empty-handed. God has seen my affliction and the toil of my hands, so He rendered judgment last night.” Thus, as is evident by 28:20-21 and 31:5, Jacob has still not declared YHWH to be his GOD, only the GOD of his father, yet he does recognize that YHWH currently has His hedge of protection around him. Therefore, with this statement, Jacob takes another step closer to claiming a personal relationship with the Lord. Further, this statement is probably a verbal attack against Laban, pointing out that Laban has lost his gods, his gods have left him, but YHWH is with Jacob and is for Jacob, and Laban even experienced that truth for himself in a dream when the Lord warned him.

Examine Laban’s response in 31:43-44: “43 Then Laban replied to Jacob, ‘The daughters are my daughters, and the children are my children, and the flocks are my flocks, and all that you see is mine. But what can I do this day to these my daughters or to their children whom they have borne? 44 So now come, let us make a covenant, you and I, and let it be a witness between you and me.”

Five times Laban places the focus on himself. Even though this is half of the pride he showed earlier (31:26-30), his true character is still revealed in that he refuses to admit any guilt or wrongdoing. However, Laban decides to make a covenant/treaty between them. Judging by the descriptions provided within the inspired Word, I think it is reasonable to believe that Laban had been motivated by self-interest, either thinking about his own safety from future retaliation (31:52), or to hopefully appease an angry god who might take away more of his wealth. Regardless, Jacob chooses the wise path of peace and completes the covenant with Laban. Later, Paul will exhort his readers to do the same in Romans 12:18: “If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men.”

In Genesis 31:45-48, Jacob sets up a single stone as a pillar, similar to what he did at Bethel (28:18); however, Laban and his kinsmen pile multiple rocks into a heap. This description is a distinction between the monotheism of Jacob who serves only the one true GOD and the polytheism of the others who serve multiple false gods. Since ancient Near Eastern treaties normally involved gods as witnesses, the treaty between Jacob and Laban also required divine witnesses. Afterwards, they eat a covenant meal together. Laban names the place “the heap of witness” in Aramaic (Jegar-sahadutha) and Jacob names the place “the heap of witness” in Hebrew (Galeed). But in 31:49-50, Laban says, “49 May the Lord watch between you and me when we are absent one from the other. 50 If you mistreat my daughters, or if you take wives besides my daughters, although no man is with us, see, God is witness between you and me.” Therefore, the place was also known as Mizpah, which means “the watchtower”. Yet, Laban failed to recognize his own hypocrisy in that moment. Though he warned of the truth that GOD sees wickedness even if no man does, that never stopped him from acting wickedly and the Lord taking notice (31:12). And then in 31:51, Laban pridefully takes credit, claiming that he set the pillar in place even though Scripture specifically states that Jacob is the one who set the pillar in place (31:45).

The phrase “May the Lord watch over you” is a common expression used today, often used in a positive way by ministers to the congregants at the end of a service. This expression is even sometimes inscribed on wedding rings. However, this expression was not used in a positive way in the ancient Near East; this expression conveyed a message of distrust. A paraphrase of the expression might be something like this: “I don’t trust you out of my sight, but since I can no longer personally hold you accountable, may the Lord hold you accountable and bring swift judgment upon you for any wickedness you commit.”

In 31:53, Laban said, “ ‘The God of Abraham and the God of Nahor, the God of their father, judge between us.’ So Jacob swore by the fear of his father Isaac.” Now, those statements concern the God of someone else, but not themselves; the God of Abraham, not the God of Jacob; the God of Nahor, not the God of Laban. So, the actions of both Jacob and Laban reveal that they have not declared a personal relationship with YHWH, although Jacob is close to commitment whereas Laban is far away. And then 31:54-55 concludes with a sacrifice, a shared meal, and Laban returning back to his home.

One final note is that 31:55 is numbered as 32:1 in Hebrew text and so 32:1-32 in the Bible are numbered as 32:2-33 in Hebrew text. But why? And does this matter? Well, on one hand, minor discrepancies of chapters and verses do not matter because they do not change the inspired text. In fact, the Old Testament of the Bible has 39 sections whereas the Hebrew text (Tanakh) only has 24 sections, yet they are the same text, merely arranged differently. But on the other hand, however, it does matter if a person desires to cite the source of a specific portion of any given text. For this reason, the chapters and verses which are now standard in our modern Bible became unanimously agreed upon so as to eliminate confusion while citing sources. In short, the original ancient manuscripts did not use punctuation, paragraph divisions, spaces to separate words, chapter numbers, or verse numbers. Simply stated, the ancient manuscripts were written as one would write a letter, with all words connected together so as to convey one continuous message. For this reason, whenever someone within the Bible quotes someone else within the Bible, the quote is often a paraphrase from an ambiguous source. For example, in Hebrews 2:6, the author writes, “But one has testified somewhere, saying, ‘What is man, that You remember him? Or the son of man, that You are concerned about him’ ”. For another example, in John 6:45, John says, “It is written in the prophets”. Another example can be seen in Acts 7:42 when Luke documents Stephen’s last speech against the religious leaders prior to being stoned to death when Stephen said, “as it is written in the book of the prophets”. However, sometimes the author will remember from which scroll the words originated and so a specific prophet will be named. For example, Luke 3:4 says, “as it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet”. The important thing to remember is that we cannot hold our modern standard of citing sources to ancient authors who expected their audiences to already know the sources being cited. But as more and more time passed, separating people from the sources being cited, the greater the need for citing those sources became evident.

So, how did the Bible receive chapters and verse numbers? And how did the chapters and verses within the Bible become standardized? The need for chapters and verses became a revelation that arrived in progressive stages. In order to facilitate the reading of manuscripts—especially in public—scribes began to create unnumbered divisions or sections as early as the fourth century. The Hebrew Old Testament was divided into verses by a Jewish rabbi by the name of Nathan in A.D. 1448. However, the chapter/verse numbers in translations of the New Testament used today originate from the beginning of the thirteenth century, when a lecturer at the University of Paris, named Stephen Langton, introduced major divisions into the Latin Bible (Vulgate) in A.D. 1227. The Wycliffe English Bible of A.D. 1382 was the first Bible to use this “chapter” pattern. Verse divisions arrived about three centuries later. In A.D. 1551, a Parisian printer named Robert Stephanus published a Greek and Latin edition of the New Testament in which each chapter was divided into separate verses. These are the verse divisions still in use today. They first appeared in an English translation in the A.D. 1560 Geneva Bible. In conclusion, the minor discrepancies of chapters/verses do not ultimately matter because the text is still the same. However, they do matter now because we use them to cite our sources (as is evident from this very study).

  • Throughout all the years of Jacob’s suffering and servitude under Laban’s selfishness, the Lord was with Jacob and was causing all things to work together for his good. Are you currently suffering in a place you don’t want to be? Are you currently suffering in a position under someone you don’t want to serve? Do you believe that GOD is causing all things to work together for your good? Do you believe that the Lord will ultimately take from the wicked and bless you in His perfect timing?
  • In Genesis 31:3, the Lord said to Jacob, “Return to the land of your fathers and to your relatives, and I will be with you.” Scripture states that the Lord will be with him at that new place. The Lord is on the move. Are you following the Lord? Many “Christians” claim to be followers of Christ, but are they going where He would go? And what about you? Do you claim to be a follower of Christ yet refuse to go where He calls you to go and do what He calls you to do? Are you truly following Christ or are you following your own desires?
  • In 31:20-21, Jacob left without telling Laban he was leaving and then Laban got angry. But why did Jacob do that? Because in 31:13, the Lord told Jacob, “leave this land, and return to the land of your birth.” When the Lord tells you to leave, you need to go. So, what about you? If the Lord tells you to do something, are you willing to do it even if other people will get upset because you do it?
  • When Laban finally caught up to Jacob and confronted him, Scripture states that Laban acknowledged YHWH (the one true GOD); however, he was upset about his stolen gods. But how could Laban show belief in GOD while at the same time claiming belief and loyalty to other gods? Well, many people acknowledge GOD without living rightly for GOD according to His Word and His will. Is that you? Do you claim GOD while living a life of idolatry? An idol is anything that replaces the One true GOD in priority and position. Idolatry extends beyond the worship of idols and images and false gods. Our modern idols are many and varied. Even for those who do not physically bow before a statue, idolatry is a matter of the heart — pride, self-centeredness, greed, gluttony, a love for possessions and ultimately rebellion against GOD. Are you placing anything or anyone above GOD in priority and/or position? Are you merely acknowledging GOD but not living for GOD?
  • In 31:39, Jacob reveals that every time Laban had a loss, Jacob absorbed that loss unto himself. Why? Sacrificial love absorbs the cost! Jacob worked for a total of 20 years under Laban! How long are you willing to work for your blessing? How long are you willing to work and endure? If you’re unwilling to wait, work, endure and suffer, then you’re not acting out from a selfless and sacrificial love. [At the time of writing this, I recently got offered the position as the pastor of Ozello Island Church of Crystal River, Florida. I waited 20 years for this moment! How fitting that I would be writing about Jacob’s 20-year wait! How statistically unlikely that I would complete my 20-year wait and then immediately produce a study about Jacob’s 20-year wait! I know it’s GOD because when I started this chronological study, I had not yet been offered that position. GOD’s timing is precise and is awesome!]
  • Although Laban acted wickedly against Jacob, Jacob still chose the wise path of pursuing peace. Is there someone in your life who acts wickedly against you? How can you pursue peace with that person?
  • Complete and total peace simply isn’t possible unless both parties agree to keep the peace. The conversation between Jacob and Laban ended with a boundary line being set between them to ensure peace. What boundary lines exist in life that we need to respect? How do we fail to do this? How can we be sure to do this? What boundary line do you need to set in place today? What boundary line exists that someone else has set in place that you need to respect? What boundaries lines have been broken by the enemy that we need to reestablish?
  • The essential message of this particular study is the concept of getting carried away. Are you getting carried away by Satan while you continue to do evil or will you allow the Lord to carry you away in His perfect timing while you continue to act according to the Lord’s absolute moral standard?

Chronological-011

Chronological Study (009/365)

Genesis 25:27 – 28:9


DESPISED BIRTHRIGHT
(Genesis 25:27-34)

Genesis 25:27-28 begins by informing us that when the twins grew up, Esau became an outdoorsman and skillful hunter whereas Jacob became a mild person of quiet temperament who preferred to stay inside the comfort of his tent. Isaac loved and favored Esau because he enjoyed eating the wild game Esau brought home; however, Rebekah loved and favored Jacob. And so this information immediately sets the stage for conflict due to a divided house out from favoritism.

As a side note, it is written that Isaac favored Esau due to him being an outdoorsman and hunter. It is also written that Ishmael was an archer who was accustomed to living life in the wilderness (21:20). Therefore, Isaac’s admiration for outdoorsmen might also be another reason why Isaac and Ishmael managed to work together to bury Abraham (25:9).

Returning to the twins, 25:29-30 informs us that at some point on some day, Esau returned from an apparent unsuccessful hunt. Exhausted and hungry, he begged Jacob for the red stew he made. This emphasis on the stew being red becomes the reason for Esau’s other name, Edom, which means “red”; however, it is also most likely the reason why Esau was described as “red” when he was born (25:25). The word “red” used to describe Esau at birth is the Hebrew אַדְמֹנִי [H132] ‘aḏmōnî (ad-mo-nee’). The word “red” used to describe Jacob’s stew is אָדֹם [H122] ‘āḏōm (aw-dome’). The nickname “Edom” is אֱדֹם [H123] ‘ĕḏōm (eh-dome’). And all three of these words come from the root word אָדַם [H119] ‘āḏam (aw-dam’), which means to be or appear red. And if you remember, the name “Adam” derives from that word as well and is the word אָדָם [H120] ‘āḏām (aw-dahm’). But what does Adam have to do with the color red? Well, blood is red, and as we already saw in 9:4, the Lord told Noah and his family that blood is equated with life and so they were not to consume the blood. In fact, later in Leviticus 17:11,14 and Deuteronomy 12:23, the Israelites will be told and reminded not to consume blood because the blood is life. Further, if you remember, after Cain murdered Abel, in Genesis 4:10, GOD said to Cain, “The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to Me from the ground.” Therefore, blood is life, blood is red, Adam (man) describes the red life within the body, and Esau’s nickname, Edom, is a play on words, which means red. Why? Well, it is written in 25:31-34 that after Esau begged for the red stew, Jacob, seeing a rare opportunity to take advantage of his brother, told Esau he could have the red stew only if he sold/transferred his birthright to him in a trade. Esau, claiming to be famished to the point of being near death, swore an oath to Jacob, ate a good meal, and then went on his way. And thus “Esau despised his birthright.”

But what exactly is a birthright? The birthright consists of the material blessings of a father being passed on to his sons. By right, the oldest son received a double portion of the inheritance received by the children (Deuteronomy 21:15-17; Luke 15:11-32). This birthright is often connected to, but needs to be distinguished from, ‘the blessing’. The blessing generally involved more of a focus on a spiritual allotment, but it crossed paths with the birthright with respect to future leadership and authority of the person (Genesis 27; 49). Royal succession was also a birthright, though GOD could countermand this privilege (2Chronicles 21:3; 1Samuel 23:17; 1Kings 2:15).

In Genesis 25:29–34, Esau willingly sold/transferred his birthright to Jacob, which, as we will soon see, forfeits his blessing (Genesis 27). Esau made an impulsive decision to give Jacob his birthright (a double portion of the family inheritance and position of future family leader) for some red stew—even though his birthright was never his to give away. By trading his birthright for some stew, Esau displayed contempt for the blessing GOD had given to him. What Esau despised is they very thing Jacob desired because he recognized its value. Esau did not grasp the significance of all that GOD had promised to fulfill through the unique line descended from Abraham, of which he was the natural heir as the firstborn. Esau did not appreciate that his birthright was linked to GOD’s plan of redemption for the whole world. So, Jacob grasped at his heel.

Consequently, Esau traded a long-term benefit/blessing for short-term pleasure, and it negatively affected his life. Although he will later swear at Jacob (27:41), here in this story he is content to swear to Jacob. Now, it’s easy for people to read Esau’s story, to look down on him, and believe themselves to be better than Esau, but is this situation really so uncommon? It would be wise to take the Lord’s advice for us to first examine ourselves before we make a quick judgment about Esau (Matthew 7:1–5; Luke 6:37–42). Have you ever traded a long-term blessing for short-term pleasure? Have you ever indulged in sexual relations prior to marriage in order to appease a short-term appetite in your pursuit of pleasure? If so, you traded a long-term benefit/blessing (keeping your virginity and purity sacred and holy for your partner in marriage) for a short-lived thrill. Have you ever spoken terrible words in the heat of the moment to satisfy your pride, only for those words to cause lasting damage to the relationship and for you to live in regret of those words later on? Have you ever given in to your desire for destructive drugs? Even if you haven’t yet experienced the long-term consequences of your decision to secure short-term satisfaction, you most assuredly will sooner or later. Many people have lived out the “Esau syndrome.” We can avoid making this mistake by comparing short-term satisfaction with its long-range consequences prior to making a decision and putting that decision into action. Our desires can demand our attention so much that we often magnify them in our field of focus. I call this the “Aperture Appetite.”

In photography, four main factors will determine if the background is blurry, leaving the focus solely on the foreground:

  1. Aperture: A wide aperture equals a narrow or shallow depth of focus.
  2. The distance from subject to background: The greater the distance between the subject and the background, the blurrier the background will be.
  3. The distance between the lens and the subject: The closer the lens is to the subject, the blurrier the background will be.
  4. The optical length of your lens (but all humans have the same “lens”).

So, putting everything together, if a person’s focus on a specific item or person is shallow and narrow, the details of the surrounding scenario will be difficult to ascertain. The distance from the subject to the background will always be great because the distance between a person’s life here on Earth is a great distance away from the new life in eternity. If a person is literally too close to a subject, the surroundings will not be in the frame and will thus be unknown. Esau’s focus narrowed to the shallowness of the surface situation, and he did not consider the surrounding scenario. The distance between Esau’s future and his present situation was great. Not taking that great distance into account, he made the mistake of allowing his lens to get too close to the subject. Because Esau was too close to the temptation and allowed himself to have a narrow focus on that temptation, the background of eternal consequences became blurred. The unfortunate part about a blurred background is that deception blends in with the rest of the blurred details. Therefore, Jacob’s deceitfulness went undetected because Esau’s desire dominated over his discernment. This is the Aperture Appetite.

But what about you? Is your temptation in your frame at all? If it is, do you start to make it the point of focus? Do you draw closer to your temptation while keeping your focus on it? Imagine this example of an Aperture Appetite in action: Within a man’s frame, there exists multiple items and people in a particular place. In this frame, an attractive female with flirtatious facial features exists. The man narrows his focus onto the specific depth of field for the female’s features. The man then draws closer and closer to the female until the man’s frame consists of only the female in focus and everything else is just a blurred background. Unfortunately for the man, in that blurred background is that female’s innocent yet ignorant husband. The female might be married, but because her husband isn’t in the man’s field of focus, that husband’s feelings and future will not be considered to be important. In fact, what I just described is what we will later see in 2Samuel 11 when David’s focus on Bathsheba leaves her husband, Uriah, in the blurred background to be buried. Acts of adultery are examples of the Aperture Appetite in action. Consider this: also, in the blurred background, let’s say there was a homeless woman sitting on the curb, hungry and cold. But because that woman was in the blurred background, her feelings and future will not be considered to be important either.

Sometimes it’s good to narrow our focus in order to examine something or someone closely; however, we should be able to see the bigger picture most of the time. In fact, both are necessary for Bible study. So, while it’s important for us to obtain precise focus on a particular word, verse, passage, or story, we also need the ability to zoom out to see how each word, verse, passage, or story fits into the entire salvation story. Ultimately, we need to set our sights on the Lord and keep our focus on heavenly things rather than the ways of this world (Matthew 5:27–29; 16:26; John 17:14; 18:36; Philippians 3:8–11,20; Colossians 3:2; Titus 3:7; Hebrews 13:14; 1Peter 5:10). And so for this particular story of Esau despising his birthright, the details help us to realize the bigger picture of how and why Jacob will take center stage in the genealogical line from Abraham so that we will eventually see how this will lead to Jesus.

  • What are you willing to trade for the thing or person you desire? Will it truly be worth the trade?
  • Do you ever find yourself willing to negotiate anything for immediate pleasure?
  • Does your spouse, children, integrity, body, or soul get included in these damning deals?
  • Do you sometimes feel that the important parts of life escaped while you were grabbing for your desire(s)?
  • Who or what is in your frame? Where is your focus?
  • How many important things or people might be in your blurred background that need to come into focus?
  • How many things or people are in focus that actually belong in your blurred background?

WELL, WELL, WELL…
(Genesis 26)

Genesis 26:1-2 says “Now there was a famine in the land, besides the previous famine that had occurred in the days of Abraham. So Isaac went to Gerar, to Abimelech king of the Philistines. The Lord appeared to him and said, ‘Do not go down to Egypt; stay in the land of which I shall tell you.’ ”

A famine in the land? What land? Well, 25:11 says “Isaac lived by Beer-lahai-roi.” So, this chapter begins by referring us back to the famine Abraham experienced in 12:10, which had forced him to go down to Egypt. Yet with the famine in this story, The Lord instructs Isaac not to go to Egypt but to stay in the land which He tells him (Gerar). That is the same command GOD gave Abraham in 12:1 when he was first called, except Abraham was told to “go” whereas Isaac was told to “stay”. And in 26:3-5, the Lord says that if Isaac stays in the land, He will bless him, repeating the blessings Abraham heard in 12:2-3. Since Isaac had been present when GOD had again declared that oath (22:15-18), he would easily recall that occasion. And after GOD emphasized faithful obedience (26:5), it is written in 26:6 that Isaac acted in faithful obedience and stayed in Gerar. So, yet again, GOD’s chosen vessel meets up with king Abimelech.

In 26:7-11, copying his father’s mistakes from 12:11-20 and 20:1-13, Isaac lies about Rebekah, telling the men of the land that she is his sister. Whereas Abimelech tried to take Sarah to be his wife, he does not try to take Rebekah to be his wife, indicating that he is most likely too old at this point in the story. Instead, it is written that “the men of the place” are the ones interested in Rebekah. Eventually, Abimelech confronts Isaac about his lie and he then confesses. Isaac explains how he was afraid for his own life whereas Abimelech explains his care and concern for all people not to fall into sin. Therefore, it is evident that Abimelech is still a man of GOD just as he proved to be while interacting with Abraham and Sarah (20:3-4,11,14-16). In fact, in 26:11, Abimelech issues a public proclamation that anyone who touches Isaac or his wife will be put to death.

Eventually, 26:12-14 informs us that the Lord, fulfilling His promise from 26:3, blesses Isaac so much that he became wealthy. However, because he became wealthy, the Philistines envied him and then filled up all of his wells with dirt (26:14-15). The same thing happened to Abraham until he made a covenant with Abimelech; and the place at which they made their covenant was called Beersheba (21:25-31). And so a picture is already being painted to show how the Philistines are becoming a wicked people. But all of this also showcases the reasons why GOD raised Abimelech up to be king – others, including Abraham and Isaac, were blessed by his leadership over the land at that time. If not for Abimelech having the fear of the Lord, it is likely the Philistines would have murdered both Isaac and Abraham. So, GOD strategically positioned Abimelech to shield Abraham and Isaac from death as if a chess player had strategically positioned any one of his/her pieces as a shield for the king. And if you think about it, because the King of kings (Jesus) comes from the line of Abraham and Isaac, the King had literally been strategically shielded from Satan and all demons.

However, because the Philistines were so envious and wicked, Abimelech said to Isaac in 26:16, “Go away from us, for you are too powerful for us.” And so in 26:17, “Isaac departed from there and camped in the valley of Gerar, and settled there.” In 26:18-22, Isaac reopened his father’s wells of water, which the Philistines filled in after Abraham’s death, and gave them the same names which his father had given them. However, when Isaac’s servants dug in the valley and found flowing water, nearby herdsmen argued over that location, and so he moved on from there. Then they dug another well, but herdsmen argued over that location as well, and so he moved on again. On his third attempt at digging a well, no one argued with him over that location; “so he named it Rehoboth, for he said, ‘At last the Lord has made room for us, and we will be fruitful in the land’ ” [for “Rehoboth” means “open space” or “room”].

Thus, the Lord told Isaac to stay in the land, knowing that Abimelech would issue a public proclamation for his protection, so that Isaac could become wealthy. However, when it was time for the Lord to guide Isaac away from there, the Lord used wicked people to steer Isaac in the direction He desired him to go. And so Isaac might have felt as if things weren’t going right for him due to his plight, but GOD permitted that persecution as part of His divine guidance. But if the Lord was guiding Isaac, where was He guiding him to go? Well 26:23 says Isaac then left there and went to Beersheba. But what is the significance of that place? Well, in 21:31-33, Abraham and Abimelech had made a covenant with each other and then that location was called Beersheba. And 22:19 informs us that Beersheba is where Abraham lived and returned to after passing his test of faith with Isaac. And now Isaac once again finds himself in Beersheba, almost to signify that he had passed yet another test and returned to that place. While there, 26:24-25 says, “24 The Lord appeared to him the same night and said, ‘I am the God of your father Abraham; Do not fear, for I am with you. I will bless you, and multiply your descendants, For the sake of My servant Abraham.’ 25 So he built an altar there and called upon the name of the Lord, and pitched his tent there; and there Isaac’s servants dug a well.”

This location is where it all began for Isaac, and now he is at this location once again, and with the same GOD as before. The fact that Isaac built an altar and called upon the name of the Lord is significant because that is what his father had done as well (12:7-8; 13:18; 21:33). Therefore, the Lord orchestrated everything so that Isaac would realize that the Lord is with him just as He was with his father, and that the promise regarding countless descendants would continue through Isaac and Rebekah.

In 26:26-27, after an unknown amount of time had passed, Abimelech came to Isaac from Gerar with his adviser and commander of his army, and “27 Isaac said to them, ‘Why have you come to me, since you hate me and have sent me away from you?’ ”

If you remember, Isaac’s father, Abraham, had also assumed the worst about Abimelech in 20:11 when he told him he thought they were all godless. Yet in 21:22-23, Abimelech said to Abraham, “God is with you in all that you do”, and then asked Abraham to make a covenant of peace with them. So, what is Abimelech’s response to Isaac? In 26:28, he says, “We see plainly that the Lord has been with you”, and then he asks Isaac to make a covenant of peace with them, concluding in 26:29 saying, “You are now the blessed of the Lord.” Therefore, the entirety of chapter 26 showcases Isaac not only following in his father’s footsteps, but also filling his shoes just as Rebekah filled the tent of Sarah (24:67).

Noteworthy is the fact that in 21:22, Abimelech stated that “God” was with Abraham, using the Hebrew אֱלֹהִים [H430] ‘ĕlōhîm (el-o-heem’); however, in 26:28-29, Abimelech now uses GOD’s name, יְהֹוָה [H3068] YHWH. Therefore, I believe it is reasonable to infer that between the timeframe of Abraham and Isaac, Abimelech came to know the one true GOD. Over time, Abimelech matured from believing in a god to believing in the one and only true GOD.

It is written in 26:32-33, “32 Now it came about on the same day, that Isaac’s servants came in and told him about the well which they had dug, and said to him, ‘We have found water.’ 33 So he called it Shibah; therefore the name of the city is Beersheba to this day.”

And as a cliffhanger, 26:34-35 ends with, “34 When Esau was forty years old he married Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Basemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite; 35 and they brought grief to Isaac and Rebekah.”

Esau not only married Hittite women, but he took for himself two wives, falling into the same sin that the wicked Lamech had fallen into (4:19). If you remember, Abraham had instructed his trusted servant, Eliezer, that it was important that his son Isaac not marry a Canaanite woman (24:3). And if you remember, Hittites are descendants from Canaan (10:15) and so are technically Canaanites. Isaac himself knows that Esau’s marriages were not good (28:1), and yet Esau made two poor decisions in the form of Hittite women.

In conclusion, Esau, by his own free will, disqualified himself from being the rightful successor of Isaac’s blessing because he chose to not only despise his birthright (25:34), but he also chose to disregard GOD’s design for marriage and to disregard the specific lineage from which GOD promised the blessing would come. Therefore, the stage is now set for Jacob to grasp at Esau’s heel (25:26).

  • Apparently, neither Abraham nor Sarah taught Isaac the lesson about lying that they learned from their own experiences. And because they seemingly never talked about it, Isaac made the same mistake. Parents need to confess their mistakes to their children as they mature so that their children will not repeat their mistakes. If you have an opportunity to help your child(ren) learn from your mistakes, it would be loving of you to teach those lessons. What kind of example are you setting for your children? Children know that parents aren’t perfect. Therefore, you might as well swallow your pride, share your mistakes, tell them how to avoid your failures, and then set your children up for success. Or would you rather remain prideful simply because you don’t want them to view you as someone who makes mistakes even though they already know you do? So, are you willing to confess your mistakes to your children so that you can save them from making the same mistakes?
  • The Philistines filled up Isaac’s wells with dirt! In those ancient days, wells were sources of life! That was a declaration of war! The enemy essentially told Isaac, “I’m not interested in your life and I don’t care if you die!” But what about you? Are there people in your life who want to cover your life with the dirt of death? Figuratively, is anyone in your life throwing dirt in your well? This act of wicked warfare happened after Isaac received blessings from the Lord. Understand this: the blessings of GOD will attract the attention of the Adversary. If you find yourself under attack, it’s probably because the enemy sees GOD’s love for you and realizes your potential. So, in your plight, are you still grateful for GOD’s divine guidance? Do you remain faithfully obedient to the Lord even while the enemy comes against you? Do you remain thankful that the Savior is still steering you to safety in your salvation story? And knowing that the difficult times are for our sanctification, do you still trust in the Lord and praise Him for all the good He is doing behind the scenes that you don’t even know about?
  • Abimelech told Isaac to leave because the Philistines became too envious of Isaac and Abimelech didn’t want trouble because of him. He told Isaac that he was too big for their small-minded situation. When GOD works in your life and you become anointed for greater things, you will become too big to stay where you are currently at in your present scenario. You will no longer wear size ‘small.’ When you grow, you need something larger to fit in. In the 2003 movie, Big Fish, young Edward (Ewan McGregor) says, “Kept in a small bowl, the goldfish will remain small. With more space, the fish can grow double, triple, or quadruple its size.” Now, is it the size of the bowl that prevents the growth of the fish? Or does the size of the bowl dramatically affect the quality of water within the bowl thereby depleting the life of the fish within the bowl? There are many factors that need to be considered, not just one or two. Regardless, humans do need room to ‘swim’ and grow, but we also need fresh water and not stagnant water – we need the Living Water, Christ Jesus (Jeremiah 2:13; 17:13; Zechariah 14:8; John 4:7-14; 7:37-39; Revelation 7:17)! We are designed to grow (1Corinthians 13:11)! Just as a child outgrows his/her clothes and environment, we spiritually outgrow our childish ways of selfish living and immature thinking. And if we refuse to leave our comfort zones that are too small for our futures, GOD will sometimes allow things to happen to us that will force us to leave so that we may grow. So, what about you? Are you currently going through difficulties that are forcing you to grow? While you may not enjoy the process or the growing pains, it is imperative that we maintain proper perspective in that process. Do you realize that GOD loves you through the process? What recent events in your life forced you to grow in your spiritual maturity? Are you thankful for that growth?
  • When the Philistines ruined Isaac’s wells, he chose not to retaliate; instead, he chose to keep the peace by moving forward in faith. Isaac dug another well; however, he lost that well over arguments. So, he dug another well. But then he lost that well over hostility. So, he dug another well. And in his third endeavor, his efforts worked in his favor. It’s important to note that Isaac had to dig many wells before he was ever able to build the altar. Likewise, we will need to do a lot of work before our efforts are finally rewarded. But it’s also important to note that Isaac dug another well after building the altar. Isaac’s work in life wasn’t done when he decided to praise the Lord after one success. We can praise GOD even while we are still digging more wells. Understand this: creating wells required sufficient knowledge of hydrology to identify the location of aquifers and the ability to dig down to them, but also sufficient knowledge of the construction process of the lining to stabilize the shaft and prevent seepage from the sides or collapse altogether. The significant amount of labor necessary for such an undertaking makes it obvious why wells were worth fighting over, and yet Isaac did not choose the path of revenge and violence. But what about you? When people wrong you, do you set your focus on going in reverse to seek revenge or on moving forward in faith, trusting in the Lord? Creating a well required a lot of digging for a long period of time! So, what about you? Figuratively, how much digging are you willing to do in life to get to where GOD wants you to be? How long are you willing to dig? How deep are you willing to go to receive the Living Water? How many different wells are you willing to dig? In that ancient time, those people realized the hard truth that they would need to seek water along their journeys and so they dug as many wells as was necessary. It is the same for us in our journey of this chronological study of the Bible. As we continue throughout this journey, we will dig deep throughout every chapter so that the Living Water can sustain us and help us get to the next book. And so it is with life in general as well – we will not be done digging until the Lord calls us Home. So, are you willing to keep digging and moving forward in faith? And are you ensuring to build altars of praise and worship along the way?

THE BLESSING
(Genesis 27:1 – 28:9)

Genesis 27:1 begins by informing us that Isaac is now old and blind. Typically, whenever Scripture provides us with minor details that do not seem to matter, it’s because those details actually do matter. In this story, GOD’s Word is setting the stage with the intent of equating blindness with something specific. In 27:4, Isaac, nearing the time of his death, summons Esau – the firstborn – because he desires to impart ‘the blessing’ upon him. This link between the firstborn, the birthright, and the blessing is emphasized in a wordplay involving all three terms. In Hebrew, “birthright” is בְּכוֹרָה [H1062] beḵôrâh (bekh-o-raw’), whereas “firstborn” is בְּכוֹר [H1060] beḵôr (bekh-or’), and “blessing” is בְּרָכָה [H1293] berāḵâh (ber-aw-kaw’). Immediately, as the reader, we should remember that while Esau was technically born first, he had despised his birthright and traded it to Jacob for some red stew in 25:31-34 because he had Aperture Appetite. Therefore, Scripture sets the stage that blindness is somehow connected to the blessing. But because blindness is a defection from GOD’s design of vision, linking blindness with the blessing informs us that the blessing is going to be a defection from the design of how the blessing is typically imparted.

In 27:5-10, Rebekah heard Isaac’s plan to bless Esau and so she quickly devised a plan of deception so that Jacob would receive Isaac’s blessing rather than Esau. But why would Rebekah do such a thing, especially knowing that her plan went against her husband’s wishes? Well, if you remember, in 25:22-23, the Lord told Rebekah that “the older shall serve the younger.” Thus, it is evident that Rebekah believed what she was doing was the right thing to do even though it required deception to achieve the goal. But why did she feel that deception was necessary? Wasn’t Isaac also aware that the older shall serve the younger? Did she not share that message from the Lord with Isaac, her husband? Or did she share with Isaac and yet he rejected the message she told him? Was either Isaac or Rebekah aware of the fact that Esau traded his birthright to Jacob for some red stew? We don’t know. All we know is that Rebekah believed what she was doing was right even though it required deception to achieve the goal. Consequently, we now have the blessing connected with both blindness and deception. Rebekah used her knowledge of both Isaac’s weakness and his desire against him. Isaac’s weakness was his blindness and his desire was tasty food. If you remember, Esau was Isaac’s favorite son because Esau hunted and Isaac got to eat the game Esau brought home (25:28). In fact, Isaac’s weakness and desire may have been intertwined in that his love for food might have made him blind to Esau’s character flaws, which might have influenced his decision to impart the blessing on Esau. Again, this is all conjecture because we only know what Scripture tells us.

In 27:11-27, an examination of the events that unfold reveals that Jacob had 12 opportunities to abandon the mission of deception. First, Jacob tried to excuse himself with a logical truth that Esau was hairy, but he was not hairy, and Isaac was smart enough to know the difference even from his sense of touch (27:11-12). So, it is this moment that helps us understand that the minor details of Esau’s descriptions at birth of being “red, all over like a hairy garment” (25:25) were indeed important to notate even though those details seemed insignificant at the time. The description of being red led to the red stew and Esau despising his birthright due to lack of vision, and the description of being hairy led to this moment of deception regarding the blessing. Thus, the descriptions of “red” and “hairy” connects the blessing with blindness and deception.

In Jacob’s second and third opportunities to abandon the mission of deception, he had been instructed to go to the flock and get two young goats (27:13). Jacob “went and got them, and brought them to his mother; and his mother made savory food such as his father loved” (27:14). But how much time passed between those events in which Jacob could have chosen not to deceive his father? Jacob’s second opportunity was when he walked to the flock and his third was during the period of time it took for Rebekah to make the meal.

In his fourth opportunity, Rebekah convinced Jacob to put on Esau’s clothes (27:15). Unfortunately, by doing this, he assumed a false identity. In his fifth opportunity, Rebekah put the skins of the goats on his hands and neck (27:16). Yikes! Who was Jacob now? He was losing his identity! Jacob’s sixth opportunity was when he served the meal to his father (27:17-18). Jacob’s seventh opportunity came when Isaac asked Jacob to identify himself, and then Jacob lied and told his father that he was Esau (27:18-19). Noteworthy is the fact that Jacob’s deceptive lie regarding his identity was on the seventh opportunity because seven is often equated with completeness. Essentially, Jacob had been provided every moment possible to abandon the mission of deception, but then his decision to deceive was made complete in his lie. Who had Aperture Appetite now? Just as Esau had Aperture Appetite for the red stew, Jacob had become oblivious to the blurred background details of the devil at work because he narrowed his focus on the blessing he desired. Jacob’s weakness was his insecurity in his own identity as the one who grabs at the heel (25:26); his desire was to have the identity of the one with the birthright and the blessing. Consequently, Jacob was willing to lie, assume someone else’s identity, and even deceive his own father. However, within this lie lies a good desire because Jacob’s desire to receive his father’s blessing was good. Again, what Esau despised, Jacob desired; the birthright Esau had been blind to see as being valuable is the very thing Jacob saw clearly to be of great value. For this reason, in Jacob’s eighth opportunity to abandon the mission of deception, Isaac asked him how he was able to bring him the meal so quickly and Jacob responded by saying, “Because the Lord your God caused it to happen to me” (27:20). Now, in this response, Jacob told his father a half-lie and a half-truth. He lied because the Lord did not help him to successfully hunt and bring home any game, as Isaac had assumed to be the case; however, he told the truth because the Lord did in fact provide the two young goats for the meal. Further, his statement was true in that the Lord did cause this to happen for Jacob because Esau had despised his birthright. For that reason, Jacob receiving the blessing had been foretold by the Lord in 25:23.

Jacob’s ninth opportunity came when Isaac asked him to come close so he could feel him (27:21-23). The tenth opportunity was when Isaac asked him if he were truly Esau, but Jacob chose to lie again and claimed to be someone he was not (27:24). At this moment, Jacob could have confessed or even conjured up another lie to play his actions off as if it was all a joke, telling his father he just wanted to trick him for fun. But his Aperture Appetite caused him to focus on his desire for the blessing. Jacob’s eleventh opportunity came when Isaac told him that if he brought the meal to him, then he would bless him (27:25). And then Isaac ate the meal; however, in doing so, he also swallowed Jacob’s deception. And finally, after Isaac consumed a meal of deception, Jacob’s twelfth and final opportunity came when Isaac asked him to come closer and kiss him (27:26). Later on, we will see that Judas Iscariot, “one of the twelve”, will betray Jesus with a kiss (Luke 22:47-48). Interestingly, Jacob betrays his father with a kiss on his twelfth opportunity to confess the truth. And Isaac, now convinced after smelling Esau’s scent on the clothes, gives Jacob the blessing (Genesis 27:27-29), thus fulfilling the Word of the Lord that the older would serve the younger (25:23).

In 27:29, Isaac imparts his blessing, “May peoples serve you, And nations bow down to you; Be master of your brothers, And may your mother’s sons bow down to you. Cursed be those who curse you, And blessed be those who bless you.”

While it is true that this blessing is for Jacob, we will later see that this blessing seems to match more precisely with Jacob’s son, Joseph (37:5-8; 41:40-44; 42:6). In fact, it will become evident later on that this blessing clearly builds on the divine promise to Abraham that kings will be among his descendants (17:6). And not only does the promise that those who curse will be cursed and those who bless will be blessed echo the promise GOD had given to Abraham in 12:3, but it also sets the stage for a later scene between Balak and Balaam in Numbers 24 when the Israelites will be cursed and yet instead will receive a blessing.

In Genesis 27:30-33, Esau returns, provides a meal for his father, Isaac becomes confused and asks Esau to identify himself, Esau identifies himself as the “firstborn”, and then Isaac trembles violently and informs Esau that he already blessed someone else and that the blessing must stand. But why did Esau identify himself as the “firstborn” when he traded away his birthright to Jacob (25:31-34)? This seems to imply that Isaac had been unaware of the fact that Esau had despised his birthright. Even if that is true, nothing can be hidden from the Lord and the truth was known (Psalm 33:13-15; Ecclesiastes 12:14; Luke 8:17; 12:2-3; Hebrews 4:13). But why did Isaac tremble violently? Because that was a natural consequence of devouring deception. He got deceived and ended up giving the blessing to someone whom he never intended to bless.

In 27:34-38, Esau cried out bitterly and asked his father to also bless him. Isaac told Esau that Jacob deceitfully took his blessing. But how did he know it was Jacob? He simply returned to his initial instinct when he had heard Jacob’s voice (27:22). In response, Esau became exceedingly angry toward Jacob and blamed him for the loss of his blessing and then asked his father if he had reserved any blessing for him. Isaac said that he had already given the good blessings to Jacob and there was nothing he could do. And in a final anguished plea, Esau said to his father, “Do you have only one blessing, my father? Bless me, even me also, O my father.”

Was Esau justified in blaming Jacob that he lost out on Isaac’s blessing? Again, Esau willingly chose to despise his birthright and therefore forfeited his blessing as the firstborn. So, while Jacob’s actions were deceitful in acquiring the blessing from his father, his desire was good because he valued what Esau despised and took for granted. Some Jewish scholars even go so far as to say that GOD sovereignly placed this zeal for the birthright and blessing within Jacob, that the Bible does not criticize Jacob for desiring the birthright and blessing, and so neither should anyone else criticize Jacob. In fact, some think that Jacob might not have attempted to take the blessing had Esau never traded away his birthright to Jacob.

But why did Isaac say that the blessings he gave to Jacob must stand and could not be revoked? Because in those ancient days, men of GOD held to the belief that their word was binding, not only to the human with whom they made the oath or agreement, but also with GOD. For this reason, people said such statements as, “The Lord is witness between us; surely we will do as you have said” (Judges 11:10). But why couldn’t Esau also receive a blessing? Because the blessings connected with the birthright had already been given, and the blessing, much like an oath, could not be revoked because it was binding with GOD as the witness. By involving the Lord, the one who broke the promise/agreement would be held accountable by the Lord.

But, after an unspecified amount of time, Isaac then said in 27:39-40, “39 Behold, away from the fertility of the earth shall be your dwelling, And away from the dew of heaven from above. 40 By your sword you shall live, And your brother you shall serve; But it shall come about when you become restless, That you will break his yoke from your neck.”

As this story will unfold, we will see that Jacob works off debt to his uncle Laban for 20 years (31:38). So, how is it that Esau will serve Jacob if Jacob will be busy serving Laban? And how is it that he would break free? And from what would he break free? When? Well, 27:41 says, “So Esau bore a grudge against Jacob because of the blessing with which his father had blessed him; and Esau said to himself, ‘The days of mourning for my father are near; then I will kill my brother Jacob.’ ”

Esau’s sinful desire to murder his brother should remind us of Cain when he desired to murder his brother, Abel. If you remember, in 4:7, GOD said to Cain, “If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door; and its desire is for you, but you must master it.” Thus, I believe it is reasonable to infer that Scripture refers to the period of time it would take Esau to break free from the bondage of unforgiveness and hatred in his heart. So, whenever Esau will be able to roam about free from thoughts of vengeance and violence against his brother, then he would truly be set free. Later on, Jesus will say in Matthew 5:22-24, “22 But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty before the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be guilty before the supreme court; and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell. 23 Therefore if you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24 leave your offering there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering.” And again, in 6:14-15, Jesus will say, “14 For if you forgive others for their transgressions, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15 But if you do not forgive others, then your Father will not forgive your transgressions.” Also, in 1John 3:15, the disciple whom the Lord loves will say, “Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer; and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him.”

However, it will become evident that Isaac’s words in Genesis 27:39-40 also refers to Esau as a nation, which will be referred to as “Edom”. At first, the nation of Edom will become hostile toward Israel, and then they will become subjugated to Israel, and then they will break free from Israel (25:30; 36:1-19; Numbers 20:18-21; 2Samuel 8:14; 2Kings 8:20-22). So, as we will see all throughout our chronological journey, GOD’s Word is often so powerful that it has more than one meaning and even becomes mirrored in the New Testament.

In Genesis 27:42, it is written that Esau’s murderous words were reported to Rebekah. But who would have reported those words to her? Most likely, it was a servant of their household. Ponder on that for a moment. That servant could have decided to remain silent or even help Esau to murder Jacob, but he/she chose instead to inform Rebekah about Esau’s wicked plan. So, I believe it is reasonable to infer that the unknown servant was not only righteous, but also loved the family enough to bring a warning of potential disaster and division. And yet the informant remains anonymous in Scripture. This reveals how someone who might be considered to be insignificant could actually be someone of great significance even if that person never receives any recognition for the significant acts he/she did.

In 27:42-43, Rebekah then informs Jacob of Esau’s plan and then tells him to flee to her brother in Haran, concluding in 27:44-45 by saying, “44 Stay with him a few days, until your brother’s fury subsides, 45 until your brother’s anger against you subsides and he forgets what you did to him. Then I will send and get you from there. Why should I be bereaved of you both in one day?”

Bereaved of both? Who was the second person referred to by Rebekah? And why would she bereave that person in addition to Jacob? One possible interpretation is that she was referring to Esau. In 9:6, the Lord commanded, “Whoever sheds man’s blood, By man his blood shall be shed, For in the image of God He made man.” Further to this command, later in our chronological journey, we will learn about the duty of an “avenger of blood”, which is someone who acts in revenge on behalf of a kinsmen who was unjustly murdered (Numbers 35:9-27; Deuteronomy 19:11-13; Joshua 20). And so an “avenger of blood” would hunt down the murderer and exact justice by killing the murderer. This will all be connected to the principle of “eye for an eye” (Exodus 21:24; Leviticus 24:20; Deuteronomy 19:21). However, because Isaac and Rebekah were too old to be avengers and they lacked the kinsmen necessary to have an avenger, it is unlikely this text is referring to Esau’s death due to an avenger of blood. Another possible interpretation is that if Esau murdered Jacob, Esau would essentially have been written off as a son and thus Rebekah could have referred to her bereavement as if mourning over two dead sons even though Esau would not have literally died. However, because Esau had plainly stated that his intention was to murder Jacob on the day Isaac died (Genesis 27:41), it is more likely that Rebekah was referring to that future day of when she would bereave both Isaac and Jacob. She has already accepted the fact that she is going to lose her husband, but she does not want to also bereave over a dead son on the same day.

Sadly for Rebekah, she thought the son she favored would only be gone for a few days until Esau’s anger subsided, but as we will later see, Jacob is going to be stuck in servitude to Laban for 20 years in order to work off debt to marry his daughter, Rachel (31:38). Rebekah’s last words to Jacob was that she would send for him to return once Esau’s anger subsided. But what did she know about the future? As we will later discover, it is likely that Rebekah dies while Jacob is gone and never gets to see Jacob again. For this reason, the brother of Jesus will later say in James 4:14-15, “14 Yet you do not know what your life will be like tomorrow. You are just a vapor that appears for a little while and then vanishes away. 15 Instead, you ought to say, ‘If the Lord wills, we will live and also do this or that.’ ”

In Genesis 27:46, after conjuring up another plan, Rebekah puts on a dramatic performance for Isaac, stating that Hittite women make her tired of living and it would be utterly devastating if Jacob ever took one of them to be his wife. Now, it’s not clearly stated in this chapter, but her words only add fuel to Esau’s fire. How do we know this? Well, not only does 28:8 inform us of this, but if you remember, 26:34 informed us that Esau had taken two Hittite women as his wives. And so adding fuel to the fire, in 28:1-5, Isaac comes into agreement with Rebekah, charges Jacob to go to Haran and find a wife from one of Laban’s daughters, and then he blesses him as he sends him on his way. Therefore, Esau lost his birthright, lost his blessing, heard his parents badmouth his wives, and then heard his father bless Jacob yet again before sending him away.

Now, it is at this point in the story that critics like to point out an apparent contradiction, claiming that 28:2 states that Jacob’s reason for going to Haran is to find a wife, whereas 27:42-45 states that Jacob’s reason for going to Haran is to flee from his brother. So, which is it? Both are true. The critic presents a fallacy of a false dilemma when claiming I have to choose one or the other. It’s not a genuine contradiction because it’s not an either-or scenario. At first, the most urgent reason for Jacob going to Haran is to flee from his brother. However, because Rebekah wants him to go there, she uses Jacob’s need for a wife as an excuse for him to go. And because Isaac agrees that the plan is good for Jacob to find a wife, that becomes the new plan; consequently, both reasons merge together into one plan.

Interestingly, in 24:3, Abraham charged his faithful servant Eliezer to ensure that Isaac did not acquire a Canaanite wife. And then in 28:1, Isaac charges Jacob with the same warning. Also, in 24:6-7, Abraham charged Eliezer to see to it that he never took Isaac back to his homeland because the Lord promised that his descendants would be given the land currently inhabited by the Canaanites. And then in 28:2-4, though Isaac sends Jacob back to the homeland, he blesses Jacob, saying, “may [you] possess the land of your sojournings, which God gave to Abraham.” Therefore, this sets the stage for Jacob to eventually return to the land promised to Abraham. But when will he return? Well, Rebekah believes his return will be sometime in the near future, but as we will soon see, his return will not be anytime soon.

After Jacob departs for his journey, it is written in 28:6-9 that Esau, knowing that the daughters of Canaan displease his father Isaac, he visits Ishmael and marries his daughter Mahalath in what seems to be a belated attempt to gain his parents’ approval. Ironically, Esau’s link with the family of Ishmael – Nebaioth (Esau’s brother-in-law) is Ishmael’s firstborn son (25:13) – further signals that GOD will not fulfill His promises through Esau because GOD passed over Ishmael in favor of Isaac (21:12). And with Esau now being passed over, Jacob will now receive favor and take center stage in the story.

  • Esau was blind and unable to see the value of his birthright. Isaac was blind and unable to see he was being deceived by Jacob. Jacob was blind and unable to see that his actions would lead to Esau desiring to murder him. Rebekah was blind and unable to see that her favoritism of Jacob would lead to her never seeing him again. And yet GOD’s blessing was given despite their blindness. But what about you? In what ways has GOD given you His blessing despite your blindness? And how many times has He blessed you despite your blindness?
  • Esau had been deceived because he believed food of the physical realm was more important than the blessing of the spiritual realm. Jacob had been deceived because he believed that he could deceive his father without any consequences. Isaac had been deceived because he believed he could rely upon his physical senses to discern spiritual matters. Rebekah had been deceived because she believed she could help Jacob deceive Isaac without any consequences. But what about you? What past experiences do you have of when you had been deceived? What were the consequences that came from those incidents of deception? What have you learned from them?
  • Did Rebekah ever tell Isaac that the Lord said the older would serve the younger or did she keep that a secret? Secrets only keep spouses separated. Two are designed to be one, remember (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:5-6)? If you’re married, are you keeping any secrets from your spouse? If you are, I admonish you to prayerfully consider breaking down those walls of secrets that separate and choose instead to be bonded in transparent love. A secret can easily slide down the slippery slope into becoming sin. Sin is a parasite that takes over its host. So, are you willing to share your secrets with your spouse?
  • Both Isaac and Rebekah played favorites and the favoritism created a divided house. Do you have children? If you do, do you play favorites? Should you? If you do play favorites, are you blind to the consequences of such a divisive act? Are you deceived into believing there will be no consequences?
  • Jacob sought to be blessed while he was actively sinning. How could Jacob possibly ask to receive a blessing while sinning? But what about you? Have you ever desired to receive a blessing from the Lord while living in sin? What was your focus on at the time? How did the Lord respond to your desire?
  • Jacob got what he desired. He received the blessing. But at what cost? Although Jacob got the blessing he desired, assuming a false identity and deceiving his dad cost him greatly. Some of the consequences are as follows: (1) It is likely he never saw his mother again; (2) the relationship with his brother was damaged and Esau wanted to murder him; (3) he will soon be deceived by his uncle Laban and used for labor; (4) his own family will become torn by strife; (5) Esau will became the founder of the enemy nation “Edom”; and (6) he becomes exiled from his family for 20 years. Now, at a quick glance, it seems as if one wrong decision will lead to years of pain and suffering; however, upon closer examination, we can clearly see that Jacob had 12 opportunities to escape from one wrong decision. But what about you? Think back at all the times when you had made a wrong decision. How many opportunities did you have to escape prior to making that one wrong decision?
  • How many times has GOD blessed you despite the fact that you made a wrong decision?
  • Are you seeking to receive the blessing? Who has lost out on being blessed so that you can receive the blessing? What about the One who might be referred to as the “the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation” (Colossians 1:15)? The One crucified on the cross? Sure, Jacob received the blessing even while he was a sinner, but what is written in Romans 5:8? “But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.” Indeed, Jesus died so that we might receive the blessing.

Chronological-009

Chronological Study (008/365)

Genesis 25:1-4 / 1Chronicles 1:32-33 / Genesis 25:5-6 / 25:12-18 / 1Chronicles 1:28-31 / 1:34 / Genesis 25:19-26 / 25:7-11


BIRTH OF TWO NATIONS; DEATH OF ABRAHAM

In Genesis 25:1-4, it is written that Abraham had taken for himself another “wife” named Keturah, using the Hebrew אִשָּׁה [H802] ‘iššâ (ish-shaw’) to describe her. That word (‘iššâ) is the same word used in chapter 2 to describe Eve as the woman and wife of Adam. Though we don’t know exactly when Abraham took Keturah as his wife, it is assumed to be after the death and burial of Sarah. If that is the case, then Abraham would have been at least 137 years of age. However, in the parallel passage of 1Chronicles 1:32-33, Keturah is described as Abraham’s “concubine”, which is the Hebrew פִּילֶגֶשׁ [H6370] pîleḡeš (pee-leh’-ghesh).

Scholars have noted that pîleḡeš is a loan-word because it is non-Semitic (not linguistically related to Hebrew). Its cognates appear in Latin (paelex) and Greek (pallakis). One view regarding the definition refers to a description of non-Hebrew women, while another view sees it as describing a female partner in a matrilocal marriage (contra patriarchal). As we will see later on in Judges 8:30—9:2, following Gideon’s death, both wives and concubines will lay claim to his authority. Reference to concubines is largely found in the Pentateuch (Genesis 22:24; 36:12) and monarchial texts (2Samuel 5:13; 1Kings 11:3). The genealogies show that succession could move through concubines (Genesis 22:24; 1Chronicles 3:9). Scripture seems to indicate that only kings or men of great power and wealth had concubines (1Kings 11:3; 2Chronicles 11:21), and the concubines were often guarded by eunuchs (2Samuel 20:3; Esther 2:14). Therefore, access to the royal concubines functioned as a daring claim to the throne, exploited by interlopers (2Samuel 12:11-12; 16:21-22). While concubines did care for the household (2Samuel 20:3), their lower status is observed when David flees into exile, leaving the concubines “to take care of the palace” (2Samuel 15:16), which would be a role too dangerous for the royal wives. In conclusion, a concubine is a woman whose status in relation to her sole legitimate sexual partner is less than primary wife.

So, what seems to be a contradiction of descriptions between Genesis 25:1-4 and the parallel passage of 1Chronicles 1:32-33 should be understood as clarification: though Abraham took Keturah as his new wife after Sarah died, her status was ultimately less than that of Sarah. In fact, Genesis 25:5-6 highlights this clarification by saying, “Abraham gave all that he had to Isaac; but to the sons of his concubines, Abraham gave gifts while he was still living, and sent them away from his son Isaac eastward, to the land of the east.”

The description of the ones sent away eastward provides the transition to discuss Ishmael and his descendants in 25:12-18, which concludes by saying, “They settled from Havilah to Shur which is east of Egypt as one goes toward Assyria; he settled in defiance of all his relatives.” This record of Ishmael living in “defiance of all his relatives” fulfills what GOD had spoken to Hagar in 16:12 when He said, “He will be a wild donkey of a man, His hand will be against everyone, And everyone’s hand will be against him; And he will live to the east of all his brothers.” But the fact that Ishmael’s 12 sons in 25:26 are described as “twelve princes according to their tribes” not only fulfills the Word of GOD from 17:20, but it also seems to foreshadow some type of significance of the future 12 tribes of Israel, yet this is the rebellious and wicked version of GOD’s chosen people, seemingly implying that defiance is a devilish deviation from GOD’s desire for His children. However, because Ishmael is the son of the servant (Hagar), Scripture does not follow these 12 tribes; instead, the focus shifts to Isaac and his descendants because GOD said that through Isaac Abraham’s descendants would be named (17:19,21; 21:12). Thus, 1Chronicles 1:34 says, “Abraham became the father of Isaac. The sons of Isaac were Esau and Israel.” [The chronicler uses the name “Israel” rather than Jacob because his chronicle was written after GOD changed Jacob’s name to Israel (Genesis 32:28).]

It is written in 25:21, “Isaac prayed to the Lord on behalf of his wife, because she was barren; and the Lord answered him and Rebekah his wife conceived.” Just as Sarah had been barren (11:30), so too was Rebekah. However, after hearing Isaac’s intercessory prayer, the Lord responded by forming life within Rebekah’s womb. (Later on, the brother of Jesus will write in James 5:16, “pray for one another so that you may be healed. The effective prayer of a righteous man can accomplish much.”) But how long did it take for GOD to answer Isaac’s prayer? Well, we don’t know the exact timing of when Isaac lifted up that intercessory prayer to the Lord, but we do know that Isaac and Rebekah got married when he was 40 years of age (Genesis 25:20) and Isaac was 60 years of age when Esau and Jacob were born (25:26). Therefore, it is possible that Isaac and Rebekah had to wait 20 years for the answer to their prayers. Meanwhile, Abraham probably felt like he was reliving his own period of waiting because it’s almost certain that he was waiting in excitement to become a grandfather. If that is the case, then Abraham had to wait 25 years for Isaac, 40 years for Isaac to get married, and then another 20 years to become a grandfather — 85 years of time spent waiting! Now, with that in mind, what do you think conversations were like between Abraham and Isaac? Abraham already had to do what Isaac is now doing. How much encouragement do you think he received from his father? How much of Isaac’s faith was learned from Abraham?

In 25:22, after feeling conflict within her womb, Rebekah “went to inquire of the Lord.” Just as her decision to go with Eliezer showcased her faith (24:58), this scenario also showcases her faith and reveals that Rebekah is a true child of GOD. But what about you? How often do you inquire of the Lord?

It is written in 25:23 that the Lord answered Rebekah directly. The Lord didn’t speak with Isaac and then have him share the message with her. Rebekah was just as important and loved as Isaac in the sight of GOD. This is an Old Testament example of the beautiful New Testament truth written in Hebrews 4:16, “Therefore let us draw near with confidence to the throne of grace, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.” Just as the Lord saw and heard Hagar and Ishmael (Genesis 16:7-13; 21:17), He heard Rebekah, and He hears us now. For this reason, Paul will later write in Galatians 3:28-29, “28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s descendants, heirs according to promise.” Therefore, Rebekah is a beloved child of GOD and heir to His Kingdom because she is a daughter of faith.

In response to Rebekah faithfully seeking the Lord, He told her that twins were within her, they will become two nations, and the older will serve the younger. Genesis 25:25-26 says, “25 Now the first came forth red, all over like a hairy garment; and they named him Esau. 26 Afterward his brother came forth with his hand holding on to Esau’s heel, so his name was called Jacob; and Isaac was sixty years old when she gave birth to them.”

The name Esau sounds like a Hebrew term that means “hair”; thus, the first son’s name was due to him being hairy. The name Jacob sounds like the Hebrew words for both “heel” and “deceiver”; thus, the second son’s name implies that he will grab Esau through deception, which implies that GOD’s prophecy regarding the older serving the younger might come to pass through means of deception. Therefore, Scripture sets the stage for the next act, which will focus on Jacob, who is the younger.

It is written in 25:7-8, “These are all the years of Abraham’s life that he lived, one hundred and seventy-five years. Abraham breathed his last and died in a ripe old age, an old man and satisfied with life; and he was gathered to his people.”

If Abraham died at 175 years of age, then that means both Jacob and Esau were 15 years of age at the time of his death because Abraham was 100 years of age when Isaac was born (21:5), and Isaac was 60 years of age when Esau and Jacob were born (25:26). But what I find interesting is that Scripture states Abraham lived a satisfied life even though he endured 175 years of challenging and often difficult experiences. For the first 75 years of his life, Abraham lived in an ancient society where people participated in pagan practices and followed false gods (Joshua 24:2). After the Lord called him at age 75 (Genesis 12:1-4), he waited 25 years for the promise of Isaac to be fulfilled (21:5) while enduring years of petty jealousy and hostility between Sarah and Hagar (16:4-6; 21:9-10). At 99 years of age, he witnessed the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. After already enduring over 100 years of toilsome life here on this earth, he then had to send away his teenage son, Ishmael (21:10-14). At around 116 years of age, Abraham endured the testing of his faith when GOD commanded him to sacrifice Isaac in a burnt offering (22:1-18). And at 137 years of age, he suffered the loss of his beloved wife, Sarah (23:1). Abraham didn’t even see his son Isaac married until he was 140 years of age (25:20), and he didn’t become a grandfather until he was 160 years of age (25:26). Therefore, it seems that Abraham only lived the last 15 years of his life in the satisfaction of seeing GOD’s promise being fulfilled. And yet Scripture states that those 15 years – 8.6% of his entire life on earth – was good enough for him to be “satisfied with life”. So, what is the secret to attaining a satisfied life? Well, Abraham was faithful until the end, he had the blessed opportunity to witness his descendants begin to multiply, and he was able to look back at the end and examine his life as a whole. The Lord only delights in those who do not shrink back and fall away (Hebrews 10:38-39). In 1Corinthians 9:24, Paul later describes how we need to run the race until the very end in order to attain the victor’s crown. For this reason, John will later write in 1John 5:4, “For whatever is born of God overcomes the world; and this is the victory that has overcome the world—our faith.” Therefore, I believe a satisfied life will be fully recognized only after faithfully enduring until the end because it will only be at the end that we will be able to examine life as a whole, thereby providing us with proper perspective.

It is written in Genesis 25:9 that both Isaac and Ishmael buried Abraham. I find it interesting that Ishmael would be present for Abraham’s burial since Abraham is the one who sent him and his mother away into the wilderness (21:14). However, Scripture states that Abraham was grieved by the incident (21:11) and even sent them away with bread and water at the most beneficial time for travel (21:14). Therefore, I believe it is reasonable to infer that Ishmael saw his grief and discerned the love, care, and concern of Abraham even at that difficult time, and then he remembered Abraham’s love after his death. The fact that both Isaac and Ishmael seem to work together to accomplish this burial ritual seems odd being though Ishmael had once hated Isaac (21:9), got sent off into the wilderness because of Isaac (21:14), and was known to be a hostile wild donkey of a man (16:12; 25:18). However, if Abraham died at 175 years of age (25:7), and he was 86 years of age when Ishmael was born (16:16), then Ishmael would have been 89 years of age when Abraham died. But if Ishmael had been about 16-17 years of age when he got sent away into the wilderness (17:1; 21:5,8), then he would have had a little over 70 years to heal and mature from that incident. Overall, I suppose the love of Abraham had united the two sons in that moment.

It is written in 25:11, “It came about after the death of Abraham, that God blessed his son Isaac; and Isaac lived by Beer-lahai-roi.”

If you remember, in 24:62, it is written that Isaac came from Beer-lahai-roi when Eliezer brought Rebekah to him. But, if we examine 16:14, it is written that after the Lord sought Hagar out, she named the well Beer-lahai-roi because she realized the Lord sees her. Therefore, this one location might be another common factor as to why Isaac and Ishmael seem to bond while burying their father.

Questions to consider:

  • What is GOD saying regarding His timing and our patience?
  • What is GOD saying regarding faith and how it correlates with life?
  • What is GOD saying regarding His purposes compared to our plans?

Chronological-008

Theophany (Angel of the Lord)

Theophany is an appearance by GOD. The word “theophany” (much like “Trinity”) is not found in the Bible; however, by the early fourth century AD, the term had come to be used in reference to GOD. Eusebius, bishop of Caesarea at that time, used the Greek term Θεόφάνεια theophaneia (theh-ah-fan’-i-ah) in reference to GOD’s appearances to people. The Greek word ἐπιφάνεια [G2015] epiphaneia (epee-fan’-i-ah) means to appear before, by, across, or over someone. The word ἐπί [G1909] epi (ep-ee’) means upon, on, at, by, before, across, or over. The word φαίνω [G5316] phainō (figh’-no) means to bring forth into the light, to become evident, to come into view, or to appear. Paul used the compounded word (epi + phainō) epiphaneia to describe the second coming of Jesus when our Lord will make His appearance before us and over us (2Thessalonians 2:8; 1Timothy 6:14; 2Timothy 1:10; 4:1,8; Titus 2:13). Why? Because it is written that when Jesus returns, He will be returning from the same place He was seen when He departed, which is from the clouds in the sky (Daniel 7:13-14; Zechariah 12:10; Matthew 24:30; 26:64; Mark 13:26; 14:61-62; Luke 21:27; Acts 1:9-11; 1Thessalonians 4:16; Revelation 1:7; 14:14; 19:11). The word θεός [G2316] theos (theh’-ahs) means “God.” Thus, when theos and phainō are compounded, the new word theophaneia means GOD comes into sight and makes an appearance before humans.

The Bible says in many places that GOD “appeared” (Genesis 12:7; 17:1; 18:1; 26:2,24; 35:9; 48:3; Exodus 3:16; 4:5; Deuteronomy 31:15). For example, Genesis 18:1 says that “the Lord appeared” to Abraham. Several other passages say that people saw GOD (Genesis 32:30; Exodus 24:10; Isaiah 6:1). When Isaiah 6:1 says that Isaiah “saw the Lord,” it should be noted that “appeared” and “saw” usually reflect different forms of the same Hebrew verb רָאָה [H7200] rā’â (raw-aw’). The Lord appeared; hence, the person saw the Lord. Again, theophaneia means GOD comes into sight and makes an appearance before humans.

Closely related to these appearances are statements describing GOD’s presence and glory within a cloud and/or fire or that His presence came down upon the tent of meeting or filled the temple. During the exodus of Israel from Egypt, it is written in Exodus 13:21, “The Lord was going before them in a pillar of cloud by day to lead them on the way, and in a pillar of fire by night to give them light, that they might travel by day and by night.” And in 40:34, it is written, “Then the cloud covered the tent of meeting, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle.” GOD typically spoke to Moses from the tabernacle (Exodus 33:7-9; Numbers 1:1; 7:89). Later, when the temple was dedicated, 1Kings 8:10 says, “the cloud filled the house of the Lord.” This cloud is associated with GOD’s glory, and where GOD says He would dwell (8:11-12). Later on, however, GOD forsakes the temple because of the sins of Israel; hence, the cloud and GOD’s glory departs (Ezekiel 10:18). But throughout the Bible, the local presence of GOD is regularly indicated by the tabernacle and later by the temple, for this is the place where all offerings are given to GOD, and where people come before GOD.

However, it is evident that an appearance by GOD does not limit GOD to one particular place. During the dedication of the temple (prior to its destruction by the Babylonians), Solomon said in 1Kings 8:27, “But will God indeed dwell on the earth? Behold, heaven and the highest heaven cannot contain You, how much less this house which I have built!” In fact, GOD’s omnipresence is described all throughout the Bible (Psalm 33:13-14; 139:7-12; Isaiah 57:15; Jeremiah 23:23-24; Colossians 1:17).

One of the most obvious scenarios when theophany occurs in Scripture is showcased in a sighting after Christ’s resurrection in Luke 24:13-35: “13 And behold, two of them were going that very day to a village named Emmaus, which was about seven miles from Jerusalem. 14 And they were talking with each other about all these things which had taken place. 15 While they were talking and discussing, Jesus Himself approached and began traveling with them. 16 But their eyes were prevented from recognizing Him. 17 And He said to them, ‘What are these words that you are exchanging with one another as you are walking?’ And they stood still, looking sad. 18 One of them, named Cleopas, answered and said to Him, ‘Are You the only one visiting Jerusalem and unaware of the things which have happened here in these days?’ 19 And He said to them, ‘What things?’ And they said to Him, ‘The things about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the people, 20 and how the chief priests and our rulers delivered Him to the sentence of death, and crucified Him. 21 But we were hoping that it was He who was going to redeem Israel. Indeed, besides all this, it is the third day since these things happened. 22 But also some women among us amazed us. When they were at the tomb early in the morning, 23 and did not find His body, they came, saying that they had also seen a vision of angels who said that He was alive. 24 Some of those who were with us went to the tomb and found it just exactly as the women also had said; but Him they did not see.’ 25 And He said to them, ‘O foolish men and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! 26 Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and to enter into His glory?’ 27 Then beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures. 28 And they approached the village where they were going, and He acted as though He were going farther. 29 But they urged Him, saying, ‘Stay with us, for it is getting toward evening, and the day is now nearly over.’ So He went in to stay with them. 30 When He had reclined at the table with them, He took the bread and blessed it, and breaking it, He began giving it to them. 31 Then their eyes were opened and they recognized Him; and He vanished from their sight. 32 They said to one another, ‘Were not our hearts burning within us while He was speaking to us on the road, while He was explaining the Scriptures to us?’ 33 And they got up that very hour and returned to Jerusalem, and found gathered together the eleven and those who were with them, 34 saying, ‘The Lord has really risen and has appeared to Simon.’ 35 They began to relate their experiences on the road and how He was recognized by them in the breaking of the bread.”

Jesus appeared and the two disciples saw Him. Again, theophaneia means GOD comes into sight and makes an appearance before humans. But what was their miraculous sign of confirmation? Jesus vanished and they no longer saw Him. A mere man cannot do that. The two disciples saw the resurrected Jesus (who is GOD) and yet they did not recognize Him until He blessed and broke bread with them. Now, before I address the often overlooked verse regarding revealed theophanies, let’s pause for a moment so that I may address the critics’ common objection regarding the disciples’ inability to recognize the resurrected Jesus. If Jesus had the same physical body after His resurrection, why did His disciples not recognize Him? Well, Jesus did rise in the same body of flesh and bones in which He died, but there exists many possible reasons why His disciples might not have immediately recognized Him. The first and most obvious reason would be that of disfigurement. Isaiah 52:14 prophesied of the Suffering Servant that “His appearance was marred more than any man.” Thus, we can reasonably conclude that Jesus’s physical body (including His face) was marred nearly beyond recognition due to the beatings, scourging, and crucifixion by the Romans. In addition, we must remember that in John 20:17, Jesus informed Mary Magdalene that He had not yet ascended to the Father; therefore, He was still in His resurrected (albeit disfigured) body. However, many other reasons why the resurrected Jesus wasn’t immediately recognized are described elsewhere:

  • In John 20:1, it is written that “Mary Magdalene came early to the tomb, while it was still dark.” It’s difficult to identify details in darkness. In 20:11-15, it is written that Mary was weeping; therefore, tears in her eyes most likely caused blurry vision. In 20:16, it is written, “Jesus said to her, ‘Mary!’ She turned and said to Him in Hebrew, ‘Rabboni!’ (which means, Teacher).” But if Mary “turned,” that means she had been facing the wrong direction and therefore not looking directly at Jesus, which would explain why she did not immediately identify Jesus. Mary was in the darkness of early morning, with tears in her eyes, and she wasn’t even facing the right direction.
  • In 20:25, Thomas, possessing disbelief due to Jesus’s confirmed death, said, “Unless I see in His hands the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe.” And yet in 20:26-27, it is written that Jesus appeared in the room with Thomas eight days later — even though the door had been locked — and He had Thomas feel the holes in His body. Therefore, we know that Jesus chose to keep His scars even though His body had been healed enough to function properly. And because Jesus kept His scars, it is reasonable to assume that His marred appearance kept some people in doubt. However, in 20:28, in response to feeling the holes in Jesus’s body, Thomas exclaimed, “My Lord and my God!”
  • In 21:4, it is written, “But when the day was now breaking, Jesus stood on the beach; yet the disciples did not know that it was Jesus.” But why not? Well, it is written in 21:8 that “they were not far from the land, but about one hundred yards away.” At such a distance, it’s not possible to accurately identify a person’s facial features. In addition, we simply don’t know if Jesus had been wearing an outer cloak which may have further covered and concealed His face. But what we do know is that the apostles recognized Jesus by His words and deeds. In 21:5-7, John recognized Jesus — even from 100 yards away — because Jesus had called attention to the fact that they had not caught any fish, then directed them to cast their net on the other side of the boat, which resulted in a massive catch. Why is that significant? Because Jesus had done the exact same thing when He first called them to follow Him (Luke 5:4-6).
  • Likewise, the two disciples on the road to Emmaus recognized Jesus when He blessed and broke bread with them. Why is that significant? Not only did Jesus bless and break bread with His apostles during the last supper (Luke 22:19), but Jesus also did the same when He fed 5,000 men plus women and children! It is written in Matthew 14:19, “He took the five loaves and the two fish, and looking up toward heaven, He blessed the food, and breaking the loaves He gave them to the disciples, and the disciples gave them to the crowds.”

In conclusion to the critics’ objection, the perceived problem of Jesus not being immediately recognized was always temporary, and the appearances always concluded with the witnesses being absolutely convinced that it was the same Jesus in His resurrected (albeit disfigured) body.

Now, returning to the topic of revealed theophanies, Luke 24:27 states that “beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures.” But what are those things that the Tanakh (Old Testament) reveals about Jesus?

Despite previously mentioned examples of theophanies, some Biblical passages seem to state that people cannot see GOD. [See my article, “Contradiction: No One Has Seen GOD?”]

Suffice it to say that the passages stating that no one can see GOD all refer to the true Spirit essence of GOD, not the theophanies. One of the examples from the Old Testament that Jesus most likely explained to the two disciples on the road to Emmaus is found in Exodus 33:18, when Moses asked GOD to show him GOD’s glory and then GOD allowed Moses to see His backside in 33:23. But whose backside did Moses see if GOD is Spirit (John 4:24; 2Corinthians 3:17) and no one can see GOD as Spirit? I believe it is evident that Moses saw the backside of Jesus Christ. How do I know? Because in Exodus 33:21, Moses was told by GOD to stand on the rock. And who is the Rock? Jesus Christ (Deuteronomy 32:4; 2Samuel 22:2-3; Psalm 118:22; Isaiah 8:14; 28:16; Matthew 7:24-25; Luke 6:46-49; Acts 4:8-12; 1Corinthians 3:11; 10:4; Ephesians 2:20; 1Peter 2:4-8). Moreover, the Son brings glory to the Father and the Father glorifies the Son (Matthew 16:27; Mark 8:38; Luke 9:26; John 8:54; 17:5,24; Romans 6:4; Philippians 2:11; 2Peter 1:17). For this reason, it is written in John 1:14, “And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.” This Word of GOD is the same Word who created all things in Genesis 1 and so is genuinely GOD (John 1:1-3). For this reason, Paul wrote in Colossians 1:15-17, “15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. 16 For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through Him and for Him. 17 He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.” Also, for this same reason, Hebrews 1:3, speaking about the Son, says, “He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power.” Therefore, Moses saw the Father’s glory, who is the Son (Jesus Christ). However, it is extremely significant that Moses only saw the backside of Christ because the Lord already had in mind to turn His back on the old covenant of the sacrificial system through the Mosaic Law in order to put His face toward the new covenant of faith in Christ who is the full, final sacrifice. For this reason, it is written that as soon as the Law had been given to Moses, the Law had been broken and shattered (Exodus 31:18 – 32:20). Thus, all people who strive to enter the Kingdom by their own merits through the Law – even though they cannot fully obey the Law – will not be able to enter (Romans 3:21-31; Galatians 5:3; 6:13; James 2:10). For this reason, it is written that the Law and its continual temporary sacrifices were only a mere shadow of the good to come (Colossians 2:17; Hebrews 10).

But GOD does not always appear in the same form within theophanies. In Genesis 16:7-13, Hagar encounters the “angel of the Lord” and yet this “angel” possesses the power and authority to promise, “I will greatly multiply your descendants so that they will be too many to count.” Hagar’s response recorded in 16:13 says, “Then she called the name of the Lord who spoke to her, ‘You are a God who sees’; for she said, ‘Have I even remained alive here after seeing Him?’ ” So, how is the “angel of the Lord” able to take ownership and promise something that only GOD can do? And why would Hagar call an angel “a God”? And is this not a similar situation as when the “Lord” יְהֹוָה [H3068] YHWH (Yahweh) promised Abraham in Genesis 15:5 that his descendants would be as numerous as the stars in the sky?

In Genesis 32:24-32, Jacob wrestles with a “man” and yet this “man” possesses the power to dislocate Jacob’s hip. In 32:28, the “man” possesses the authority to say, “Your name shall no longer be Jacob, but Israel; for you have striven with God and with men and have prevailed.” In 32:29, the God-man declines to share His name but then blesses Israel. In response, Israel proclaims in 32:30, “I have seen God face to face, yet my life has been preserved” and then he names that location “Peniel,” which means “the face of God.” But how can a mere “man” possess the authority to change Jacob’s name to Israel? And why would Israel call a man “God”? Is it not similar to when the “Lord” יְהֹוָה [H3068] YHWH (Yahweh) changed Abram’s name to Abraham (Genesis 17:5)?

However, is it not written in Isaiah 42:8, “I am the Lord, that is My name; I will not give My glory to another, nor My praise to graven images”? And is it not also written that Scripture cannot be broken, GOD’s Word stands forever, and that His Word will accomplish His desires and succeed in the matter for which He sent it (Isaiah 40:8; 55:10-11; Matthew 24:35; John 10:35)? So, how then, is it possible for a “man” or an “angel of the Lord” to receive GOD’s glory unless the “man” and “angel of the Lord” are GOD? After all, is it not written that angels refuse to accept worship and refuse to usurp the power and authority of GOD (Colossians 2:18; Revelation 22:8-9)? So, who then, is the “angel of the Lord”?

In Exodus 3:2-6, it is written that the “angel of the Lord” appears to Moses in a blazing fire from the midst of a bush, and then Moses took notice. It is written in 3:4-6, “4 When the Lord saw that he turned aside to look, God called to him from the midst of the bush and said, ‘Moses, Moses!’ And he said, ‘Here I am.’ 5 Then He said, ‘Do not come near here; remove your sandals from your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground.’ 6 He said also, ‘I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.’ ” Therefore, the “angel of the Lord” is the “Lord” יְהֹוָה [H3068] YHWH (Yahweh).

Examine Judges 13:2-22. In 13:3, the “angel of the Lord” promises Manoah’s barren wife that she was going to conceive and give birth to a son. In 13:6, “the woman came and told her husband, saying, ‘A man of God came to me and his appearance was like the appearance of the angel of God, very awesome.’ ” In 13:10-11, the “angel” is described as a “man.” In 13:17, Manoah asked for the name of the “man,” but in 13:18, “the angel of the Lord said to him, ‘Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?’ ” And finally, in 13:20-22, it is written, “20 For it came about when the flame went up from the altar toward heaven, that the angel of the Lord ascended in the flame of the altar. When Manoah and his wife saw this, they fell on their faces to the ground. 21 Now the angel of the Lord did not appear to Manoah or his wife again. Then Manoah knew that he was the angel of the Lord. 22 So Manoah said to his wife, ‘We will surely die, for we have seen God.’ ”

Now, when the “angel of the Lord” promised Manoah’s barren wife that she was going to conceive and give birth to a son, was it not similar to when the Lord promised Sarah in Genesis 18:10 that she would conceive and give birth? And when the awesome “angel” “man” declared that His name was “wonderful”, is it not similar to what is written about our Lord Jesus in Revelation 19:12 in that “He has a name written on Him which no one knows except Himself”? In fact, the word translated as “wonderful” is the Hebrew word פִּלְאִי [H6383] pil’î (pil-ee’), which means wondrous, remarkable, or even incomprehensible. This same word is seen when David marveled over GOD’s omniscience in Psalm 139:6: “Such knowledge is too wonderful for me; it is too high, I cannot attain to it.” And finally, is Manoah’s encounter not similar to Jacob’s encounter when he declared in Genesis 32:24-32 that he saw GOD even though they both encountered a “man”? So, who is this God-man?

Ezekiel 1:26-28 describes “a figure with the appearance of a man” who possessed the radiance like that of a rainbow and “the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord.”

In Daniel 3:25, Nebuchadnezzar, describing the miraculous and awesome theophany he witnessed in the fire of the furnace, said, “the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

Psalm 47:8 says, “God reigns over the nations, God sits on His holy throne.” Why then, does Jesus say that He – the Son of Man – will be sitting on the throne (Matthew 19:28; 25:31; Mark 14:61-62)? Why does John describe GOD sitting on the throne, and yet the One sitting on the throne matches the description of Ezekiel 1:26-28 of “a figure with the appearance of a man” with a rainbow around Him (Revelation 4:2-3)? And why is the One on the throne also the Lion of Judah, Root of David, and the Lamb even though Jesus is the Lion, Root, and Lamb (Isaiah 11:1; Matthew 1:1-17; John 1:29; Acts 13:22-23; Romans 15:8-13; Revelation 5:1,5,12)? Therefore, it seems evident that the “man” whom Jacob and Manoah encountered is the “angel of the Lord” who is also GOD on the throne.

In other passages, GOD is locally present and speaks, yet without explicitly appearing, which might also be classified as a theophany (Numbers 22:9,20; 23:16; Mark 1:11; 9:7; John 12:28).

And finally, one of my favorite scenarios showcasing theophany occurs in Genesis 18—19. In 18:1, the “Lord” יְהֹוָה [H3068] YHWH (Yahweh) appeared to Abraham. But what was the appearance of the Lord? In 18:2, it is written that Abraham saw three men. In 18:10, one of the men promised that the same time of the following year Sarah would have a son. In the distance, Sarah laughed because she believed herself to be too old to have children. In 18:13, the Lord (YHWH), being omniscient, knew she laughed and then called her out on her lie after she denied it. In 18:14, the Lord (YHWH) promises that He will return at the appointed time the following year. In 18:17, the Lord (YHWH) said, “Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do?” And then what happens in 18:20-22 contains extremely important details of this theophany: “20 And the Lord said, ‘The outcry of Sodom and Gomorrah is indeed great, and their sin is exceedingly grave. 21 I will go down now, and see if they have done entirely according to its outcry, which has come to Me; and if not, I will know.’ 22 Then the men turned away from there and went toward Sodom, while Abraham was still standing before the Lord.” And then from 18:23-32, Abraham attempts to intercede on behalf of anyone who might be righteous so that they might be saved. The Lord (YHWH) concludes by assuring Abraham that even for the sake of 10 righteous people, He would not destroy Sodom and Gomorrah. And then 18:33 ends by saying, “As soon as He had finished speaking to Abraham the Lord departed, and Abraham returned to his place.” However, 19:1 begins by saying “Now the two angels came to Sodom in the evening as Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom.” And then 19:11 states that the two men (who were angels) possessed the power to strike the wicked men of Sodom with blindness. In 19:13, the two angels say, “we are about to destroy this place, because their outcry has become so great before the Lord that the Lord has sent us to destroy it.”

Let’s review the logic of this theophany as stated by the Scripture that cannot be broken:

·       The Lord appeared to Abraham;

·       yet Abraham saw three men;

·       but One of the men spoke as the Lord;

·       The One who spoke as the Lord remained with Abraham as the other two men went to Sodom;

·       the two men who went to Sodom were angels;

·       the two angels said they were sent by the Lord (from whom they had just departed, the One still talking to Abraham);

·    Therefore, the One who remained with Abraham and then departed from Abraham is the Lord even though He appeared in the form of a man.

So, if we examine all inspired scriptures together (because Scripture interprets Scripture), what is the logical conclusion of this GOD-man? I believe the identity of this GOD-man is exactly as Jesus told His disciples after His resurrection on the road to Emmaus in Luke 24:27, which states that “beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures.”

Conclusion:

The New Testament is the continuation and final fulfillment of the Old Testament; therefore, Christianity is the continuation and final fulfillment of Judaism. Jesus fulfilled the Law (Matthew 5:17). Jesus is GOD who tabernacled in a temple not made by human hands (Matthew 1:23; John 2:19-22; Acts 7:48; 17:24; Hebrews 8:2). Jesus is the second Person of the Trinity. And unless your faith is in the finished sacrificial work of Jesus Christ, there can be no atonement for your sins and you will die in your sins. There is no other way. Jesus is the Truth and His Word is Truth: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me” (John 14:6). If you reject the full and final sacrifice of Christ on the cross, then you will reject your only means of salvation and entrance into the Kingdom. For the when Christ returns as King of kings (Psalm 2; Revelation 19:11-16), He is going to be searching all people for His Holy treasure in earthly vessels (2Corinthians 4:7; Ephesians 1:13-14), that is, all people in whom the Holy Spirit dwells. When He returns, if He finds the vessel empty, that vessel will be shattered with His rod of iron. Therefore, repent, for that Day is coming soon. And it is so easy to receive and accept this Gospel because it’s Good News — all the work has been done for you! For this reason it is written in Ephesians 2:8-9, “8 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast.”

Theophany