Is the Bible full of lies and liars? Does GOD lie? Does GOD ever condone lies? Does GOD ever bless people because they lied? Many critics believe that GOD is the Lord of lies and deity of deception; however, a full investigation into the critics’ claims only reveals their ignorance of GOD’s Word.
The first one to plead his case seems right, until another comes and cross-examines him.
(Proverbs 18:17, AMP)
Perceived Problem:
We are told in the Bible not to lie (Exodus 20:16), but, in Genesis 12:10-20, when Abraham lied about Sarah, his wealth increased. But if we’re not supposed to lie, why did GOD bless Abraham and allow him to prosper by lying?
Solution:
First, Abraham’s increase in wealth should not be viewed as a divine reward for his lie. Pharaoh’s gifts to him were understandable. Pharaoh may have felt obligated to pay amends for the wicked constraint that his corrupt society put on strangers who visited his land. Furthermore, Pharaoh may have felt he had to make amends to Abraham for unwittingly taking his wife into his palace. Adultery was strictly forbidden by the Egyptian religion. And of course, Pharaoh could have merely given to Abraham out of his fear of the Lord, believing that his gift was appease an angry god. What is more, Abraham paid for his sin. The years of trouble that followed may have been a direct result of his lack of faith in GOD’s protecting power. And finally, although some people are portrayed as men of GOD, they are still fallible and responsible for their own sin (ex: David and Bathsheba, 2Samuel 12). GOD blessed them in spite of, not because of, their sins. In fact, this is the message of the Gospel: GOD blessed us and gave us the gift of salvation in spite of our sins (Romans 5:8).
Context is key. Abram told his wife, Sarai, to lie so that he wouldn’t die. This decision was based on fear, not love. Understand this: there is no fear in love for perfect love casts out fear (1John 4:18). Love puts others first. Abram put himself before Sarai with this decision. Fortunately, GOD loved and protected Sarai as Abram should have done (Genesis 12:17). As believers, we will find that when we make a determined decision to follow GOD, we will almost immediately encounter great obstacles that will challenge our faith. Just as Noah was a righteous man yet eventually sinned, Abram was a man of faith yet eventually lost faith. However, Noah’s moment of failure and Abram’s moment of flounder are mere flaws from finite and fallible beings. But as the entire Bible reveals, faith in the Lord is greater than our flaws. When Abram lied, his problems multipLIED! He could have been welcomed; instead, he was kicked out of that land. Abram’s life was not spared because of his lie, but because of GOD in spite of the lie.
In Genesis 20:1-18, Abraham lied yet again, using the same tactic as he had before (12:11-13). And just like before, it did not work and the situation did not go well. And just like the time before, GOD had to come to their rescue (12:17; 20:3). Abraham did not learn his lesson the firs time. In fact, by giving in to the temptation again, he risked turning a single sinful act into a sinful pattern of lying whenever he suspected his life was in danger. What habit do you now have because you had given in to the temptation long enough for it to become a habit? Which is easier: to walk away before the habit takes you captive or to escape captivity while in chains? Was there a careless expectation for GOD to save Abraham and Sarah from their wrong choices? As if to say, “It’s okay because I know GOD will forgive me.” But is that acceptable? No (Romans 6; James 4:17)! Are you still living in sin because you have taken GOD’s grace for granted? Abraham believed it would be more effective to deceive Abimelech than to trust GOD to work in the king’s life. We should not assume that GOD will not work in a situation that has potential problems. Isn’t GOD capable of changing hearts? In fact, GOD did work in the heart of Abimelech and even prevented him from sinning (Genesis 20:6). How many times has GOD worked in your heart and prevented you from sinning in certain situations? Have you not felt the change within due to the Holy Spirit speaking conviction? Abimelech ended up being an example of righteousness when he chose not to retaliate against Abraham (20:14-16), thereby providing us with an example of what is written in Matthew 5:38-41 of not taking revenge but to bless your enemy instead. Abraham’s action was a sin against Abimelech yet the king chose to bless Abraham. Are you willing to bless someone who has sinned against you? If not, why do you think you are unwilling to live as GOD commands us to live? Have you ever blessed someone who sinned against you? If not, now is a good time to start forming new helpful habits to replace the old harmful habits. GOD clearly used Abraham’s sin as a lesson for us.
Perceived Problem:
In Genesis 31:20, Jacob is said to have deceived Laban by not telling him that he was fleeing. However, GOD blessed Jacob by appearing to Laban and warning him not to speak either good or evil to Jacob (31:24). How could GOD bless Jacob after he had deceived Laban?
Solution:
First, it is not necessary to translate the Hebrew word in Genesis 31:20 as “deceived.” The passage literally states, “And Jacob stole Laban’s heart.” This is a Hebrew idiom which can be used in a given context to mean “to deceive” or “to outwit.” Jacob did not tell Laban that he was going to leave, nor did he tell Laban that he was going to stay. He may have left in secret because he feared Laban (31:2). Neither was Jacob obligated to remain with Laban, since he had fulfilled all the requirements of the contracts between them. In spite of the accusations by Laban, Jacob was justified in his fear and his action to leave without telling Laban.
Second, even on the assumption that Jacob was involved in deception, GOD would not bless him because of it, but in spite of his shortcomings. This kind of situation is an example of the principle that not everything recorded by the Bible is approved by the Bible. Description does not equate to prescription. It is a mistake to assume that everything contained in the Bible is commended by the Bible. The whole Bible is true (John 17:17), but it records some lies, for example, Satan’s lies (Genesis 3:4; John 8:44) and Rahab’s lies (Joshua 2:4). Inspiration encompasses the Bible fully in the sense that it records accurately and truthfully even the lies and errors of sinful beings. The truth of Scripture is found in what the Bible reveals, not in everything it records. Unless this distinction is held, it may be incorrectly concluded that the Bible teaches immorality because it narrates David’s adultery (2Samuel 11:4), that it promotes polygamy because it records Solomon’s hundreds of wives (1Kings 11:3), or that it affirms atheism because it quotes the fool as saying “there is no God” (Psalm 14:1).
GOD had chosen Jacob to become the father of the 12 tribes of Israel, not because of any righteousness in Jacob, but on the basis of GOD’s grace. GOD could bless Jacob according to His grace even though Jacob was a sinner. Through Jacob’s experiences with Laban, and later his confrontation with Esau, and his wrestling with the angel of the Lord in the night, Jacob’s character was changed so that he became a fit vessel for GOD to use.
Perceived Problem:
Genesis 31:32 makes the statement that Jacob did not know that “Rachel had stolen” Laban’s idols. However, it seems that GOD blessed Rachel because she lied to Laban.
Solution:
GOD did not bless Rachel either for stealing the idols or for lying about her deed. Simply because Laban did not discover that Rachel was the thief does not mean that GOD blessed her. On the contrary, it is more reasonable to assume that GOD did not expose Rachel’s theft in order to protect Jacob. Also, Genesis 35:16-19 reports that Rachel died in delivering her second son, Benjamin. In the intervening chapters between 31:32 and 35:19 very little is said about Rachel. The biblical record reveals that in fact GOD did not bless Rachel for what she did, but allowed her to fall into the background of importance until her painful death.
Perceived Problem:
The Bible declares that “the authorities that exist are appointed by God” (Romans 13:1). The Scripture also says, “Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord” (Proverbs 12:22). But the Pharaoh (king) of Egypt had given a direct order to the Hebrew midwives to murder the newborn Hebrew boys. “But the midwives feared God, and did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but saved the male children alive” (Exodus 1:17). Not only did the midwives disobey Pharaoh, but when he questioned them about their actions, they lied saying, “Because the Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women; for they are lively and give birth before the midwives come to them” (1:19). In spite of this, 1:20-21 states that GOD “dealt well with the midwives… He provided households for them.” How could GOD bless the midwives for disobedience and lying?
Solution:
There is little question that the midwives both disobeyed Pharaoh by not murdering the newborn male children, and that they lied to Pharaoh when they said they arrived too late to carry out his orders. Nonetheless, there is moral justification for what they did. First, the moral dilemma in which the midwives found themselves was unavoidable. Either they obeyed GOD’s higher Law, or they obeyed the lesser obligation of submitting to Pharaoh. Rather than commit deliberate infanticide against the children of their own people, the midwives chose to disobey Pharaoh’s orders. GOD commands us to obey the governmental powers, but He also commands us not to murder (Exodus 20:13). Moreover, murder naturally goes against the absolute moral standard we innately possess (Romans 2:12-16). The saving of innocent lives is a higher obligation than obedience to government. When the government commands us to murder innocent victims, we should not obey. GOD did not hold the midwives responsible, nor does He hold us responsible, for not following a lower obligation in order to obey the higher Law (Acts 4; Revelation 13). In the case of the midwives, the higher Law was the preservation of the lives of the newborn male children.
Second, the text clearly states that GOD blessed them “because the midwives feared God” (Exodus 1:21). And it was their fear of GOD that led them to do what was necessary to save these innocent lives. Thus, their false statement to Pharaoh was an essential part of their effort to save lives.
Third, their lying is comparable to their having disobeyed Pharaoh in order to save the lives of the innocent newborns. This is a case where the midwives had to choose between lying and being compelled to murder innocent babies. Here again the midwives chose to obey the higher moral Law. Obedience to parents is part of the moral Law (Ephesians 6:1). But if a parent commanded his/her child to kill a neighbor or worship an idol, the child should refuse. Jesus emphasized the need to follow the higher moral Law when He said, “He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me” (Matthew 10:37). It’s important to realize that GOD didn’t bless the midwives because they lied; rather, GOD blessed the women for deciding to save lives rather than be an accomplice in mass murder. GOD blessed them because they were loyal to the Lord.
Perceived Problem:
When the spies came to Jericho, they sought refuge in the house of Rahab. When the king of Jericho commanded Rahab to bring out the men, she lied saying that the men had already gone and that she did not know where they went. However, when Israel finally destroyed Jericho, Rahab and all her family were saved alive. How could GOD bless Rahab for lying?
Solution:
Some people argue that it is not clear that GOD blessed Rahab for lying. GOD certainly saved Rahab and blessed her for protecting GOD’s men and assisting them in the overthrow of Jericho. However, nowhere does the Bible explicitly say that GOD blessed Rahab for lying. GOD could have blessed her in spite of her lie, not because of it. Actually, Rahab’s act of protecting GOD’s men was a demonstration of great faith in the GOD of Israel. She firmly believed that GOD would destroy Jericho, and she exhibited that belief by siding with Israel against the people of Jericho when she protected the spies from being discovered. In fact, Rahab is in the Hall of Faith as it is written in Hebrews 11:31: “By faith Rahab the harlot did not perish along with those who were disobedient, after she had welcomed the spies in peace.” Rahab is also commended in James 2:25 for her faith producing good works.
Other people insist that Rahab was faced with a real moral conflict. It may have been impossible for her to both save the spies and tell the truth to the soldiers of the king. If so, GOD would not hold Rahab responsible for the unavoidable moral conflict. Certainly a person cannot be held responsible for not keeping a lesser law in order to keep a higher obligation. The Bible commands obedience to the government (Romans 13:1; Titus 3:1; 1Peter 2:13), but there are many examples of justified civil disobedience when the government attempts to compel unrighteousness (Exodus 5; Daniel 3, 6; Revelation 13).
Although the Bible records Rahab’s lie, the Word is silent regarding her lie. Rahab is, however, commended for her faith in GOD. Several explanations for this have been offered:
- GOD forgave Rahab’s lie because of her faith;
- Rahab was simply deceiving the enemy, which is a normal and acceptable practice in wartime;
- Rahab was not a Jew, so she could not be held responsible for keeping the moral standards set forth in GOD’s Law;
- Rahab broke a lesser principle— telling the truth — to uphold a higher principle — protecting GOD’s people.
Rahab risked her life to hide GOD’s men (Joshua 2:1-8), confessed her faith in GOD’s acts of redemption (2:9-11), and negotiated for her family’s preservation (2:12-21). Thus, what she did was out of reverence of the Lord and love for her family. Therefore, GOD blessed her in spite of her lie because of her faith and her love.
Perceived Problem:
Abraham was judged by GOD for telling the half-truth that Sarah was his sister (she was his half sister) when she was really his wife. However, in 1Samuel 16, GOD actually encourages Samuel to tell only half of the truth, namely, that he had come to offer a sacrifice, when he had also come to anoint David king as well. Two problems emerge from this. First, did not GOD encourage deception here? Second, why did GOD condemn Abraham for the same thing that He commanded Samuel to do?
Solution:
The first thing to note in response to this perceived problem is that the two situations are not the same. In Abraham’s case, his so-called “half-truth” was in fact a whole lie, for the question he was asked was, “Is Sarah your wife?” And his answer in effect was really “No. She is my sister.” By his answer to this question Abraham intentionally misrepresented the facts of the situation, which is a lie.
Samuel’s case was different. The question he was asked is, “Why have you come to Bethlehem?” His answer was, “I have come to sacrifice to the Lord” (1Samuel 16:2). This was truthful in that it corresponded with the facts, namely, it is why he came and it is what he did. The fact that he also had another purpose for coming is not directly related to the question he was asked and the answer he gave, as it was in Abraham’s case. Of course, had Samuel been asked, “Do you have any other purpose for coming?” then he would have had to come clean. To say “No” would have been a deception.
Second, concealment and deception are not the same. Samuel certainly concealed one of the purposes of his mission so as to save his life. It is not always necessary (even possible) to tell all the truth. The fact that GOD told Samuel to conceal one of the purposes of his visit to avoid possible death does not necessarily mean he was guilty of lying. Not telling part of the truth and telling a falsehood are not necessarily the same. Secrecy and concealment are not the same as duplicity and falsehood. In this specific scenario, GOD in His omniscience knew the best way to respond so as to both answer truthfully yet also secure safety.
Perceived Problem:
Scriptures teach that GOD is Truth (Deuteronomy 32:4; 1Samuel 15:29; John 14:6; Romans 3:4) and that it is impossible for Him to lie (Numbers 23:19; Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18). Furthermore, GOD commands us not to lie (Exodus 20:16), and He will severely punish those who do (Revelation 21:8). And yet, in spite of all this, GOD is portrayed in 1Kings 22:22-23 as enlisting lying spirits to entice wicked king Ahab to seal his own doom. The text says, “Now therefore, look! The Lord has put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these prophets of yours.”
Solution:
Several factors should be considered in understanding this situation. First, this is a vision. As such, it is a dramatic picture of GOD’s sovereign authority spelled out in regal imagery. Second, this dramatic vision represents GOD in all His sweeping authority so that even evil spirits are represented as being subjected to His ultimate control. Third, the GOD of the Bible, in contrast to gods of pagan religions, is in sovereign control of everything, including the forces of evil which He uses to accomplish His good purposes (Job 1-3). Fourth, the Bible sometimes speaks of GOD “hardening” people’s hearts (Exodus 3:19; 4:21; 5:2; 7:3; Romans 9:17) or even sending them strong delusions (2Thessalonians 2:11). However, on closer examination of the text, we discover that GOD allowed this only on those who freely hardened their own hearts (Exodus 8:15) and who “did not believe the truth” (2Thessalonians 2:12). In short, GOD is not commending lying here. He is simply utilizing it to accomplish His purposes; GOD always creates good from the bad and uses evil to accomplish good (Genesis 50:20). GOD is not promoting lying, but permitting it to bring judgment on evil. That is, GOD, for His own purposes of justice, allowed Ahab to be deceived by evil spirits whom He knew in His omniscience would be used to accomplish His sovereign and good will.
Perceived Problem:
When Elisha went out to meet his enemies, he told them “this is not the way, nor is this the city. Follow me, and I will bring you to the man whom you seek” (2Kings 6:19). how could a man of GOD lie to these Syrian troops?
Solution:
What Elisha told them was not actually a lie. The Syrian troops were sent to Dothan to capture Elisha. The Lord blinded them, and Elisha came out of the city to meet them. What Elisha told them was “this is not the way, nor is this the city.” Once Elisha came out of the city he was no longer in Dothan. Consequently, entering Dothan was no longer the way to capture Elisha, neither was it the city. Elisha also instructed them, “follow me and I will bring you to the man whom you seek.” This was also true. Elisha went before them into Samaria, and when they arrived, the Lord opened their eyes and they saw Elisha, and that they were in Samaria.
Perceived Problem:
In Jeremiah 20:7, the KJV reads as, “O Lord, thou has deceived me, and I was deceived.” But, GOD is a GOD of Truth who cannot lie (Hebrews 6:18), nor can He tempt others to sin (James 1:13). How then could GOD deceive Jeremiah?
Solution:
The Hebrew word (patah) translated “deceived” by the KJV does not imply moral deception here. It can be translated “induced” or “persuaded” (NKJV and NIV note). It simply means that GOD persuaded or constrained Jeremiah into a ministry of which he was not fully aware of all the consequences. This is merely a case of Jeremiah venting from his prior unrealistic expectations of his role in the ministry. But this is a good description of marriage. And who but the most cynical would insist that all romance and courtship are moral deception simply because the couple could not foresee all they were getting into. In context, Jeremiah was venting because Pashhur the priest beat Jeremiah and put him in the stocks (Jeremiah 20:2). But GOD never promised Jeremiah a lifetime of happiness during his ministry; in fact, GOD informed Jeremiah from the beginning that his enemies would fight against him but that they would not prevail against him (1:19). Jeremiah’s complaints to GOD come from emotion as is evident by the fact that he shifts from lament to praise (20:9-13), but then shifts again to distressed realism over his calling (20:14-18). There is a reason Jeremiah is known as the weeping prophet and that is because he was a very emotional person.
Perceived Problem:
In Ezekiel 14:9, Ezekiel declares that GOD “induced” the false prophets to speak and then would “destroy” them for doing so. But this sounds deceptive.
Solution:
GOD’s action was neither deceptive nor morally coercive. Giving false prophecies is exactly what false prophets do. So, there is no coercion by GOD in inducing them to ply their trade. The sovereign GOD so ordered the circumstances that these evil men would, by their own free will, utter false prophecies that would reveal their true character and lead to their eventual doom. It is because they did not love the Truth that GOD gave them over to error and its eventual consequence, destruction (2Thessalonians 2:10-11).
Perceived Problem:
In John 7:3-4, Jesus’s unbelieving brothers challenged Him to go up to Jerusalem and show Himself openly if He was the Messiah. Jesus refused, saying, “I am not yet going up to this feast, for My time has not yet fully come” (7:8). However, only a few verses later Jesus “went up to the feast” (7:10). So, didn’t Jesus lie to His brothers?
Solution:
Jesus did not go up to Jerusalem at the exact time or in the exact way in which His brothers suggested. They suggested He go at that moment and also be “known openly” (7:4). But the Scripture explicitly declares that “He also went up to the feast, not openly, but as it were in secret” (7:10). The Greek present tense in 7:8 can legitimately have the sense, “I am not now going,” indicating that Jesus did not go up to the feast at that time and in the way the brothers suggested. And because the Jews had plotted to kill Jesus (5:18), and “the Jews were seeking Him at the feast” (7:11), and because GOD’s timing is precise and with purpose (7:6,8), Jesus delayed His journey to Jerusalem. Midway into the festival, Jesus went to the Temple and began to teach (7:14), declaring publicly that the mob had the mind to murder Him (7:19). Consequently, because their denial of wanting to murder Him (7:20), the Jews had to scheme of legal ways to get rid of Jesus, which thereby delayed His inevitable death to the exact moment which GOD had arranged from the beginning.
Perceived Problem:
The high priest Ananias commanded that Paul be struck on the mouth. Paul rebuked him for doing so, and those who stood by condemned Paul for reviling the high priest. Paul responded by claiming, “I did not know… that he was the high priest” (Acts 23:5). But this is highly unlikely, since Paul himself was a member of the Jewish Sanhedrin and worked closely with him before his conversion (Acts 19:1-3). So, did Paul lie?
Solution:
There are several views taken on this passage. Some suggest that Paul may have not known the high priest personally, even though he was previously a member of the Jewish Council. Others claim that Paul may have had poor vision (perhaps his “thorn in the flesh”) and not been able to see him clearly. Still others believe that Paul could have been lying to get himself out of a bad situation. Apostles sinned too (Galatians 2:11-13). If this were the case, Acts is simply giving us a true record of Paul’s sin. However, it seems more plausible to take Paul’s statement as sarcastic but not false. In this case, his statement, “I did not know… he was the high priest,” could be translated something like this: “This sinner is the high priest of GOD’s Law? I would never have known it by his unlawful command to strike me!” After all, Ananias had violated Jewish law by assuming that Paul was guilty without a trial and ordering his punishment (Deuteronomy 19:15). Further, Paul could have insinuated that Ananias was not the true high priest because Christ Jesus is the true High Priest (Hebrews 2:17; 4:14; 5:6; 7:26-27; 9:12).
Perceived Problem:
Paul wrote, “And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie” (2Thessalonians 2:11). But Revelation 21:8 says, “the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” But it seems inconsistent for GOD to condemn liars and yet send such a strong delusion that people should believe a lie. So, how can GOD send a lie for people to believe and yet not allow liars into Heaven?
Solution:
GOD does not send a lie but simply confirms those who do not wish to believe the truth. GOD is not responsible (i.e., culpable) for those who go to Hell. For it is because of their rejection of the Gospel that they eventually end up there, not because of GOD’s negligence. The context of this passage reveals that man has already rejected the Gospel of Christ. Paul says that when the Antichrist comes, he will come with signs and false wonders with all deception of wickedness (2Thessalonians 2:8-10). These things happen for “those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved” (2:10). When GOD sends the deluding influence, Paul says He does so in order “that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness” (2:12). They have chosen to reject GOD rather than to accept His provision of salvation. GOD is not sending the lie to trick people, but He sends delusions to reveal human depravity in which they freely choose evil over good.
Conclusion:
The question then remains: is there ever a time when lying is the right thing to do? The most common illustration of this dilemma comes from the life of Corrie ten Boom in Nazi-occupied Holland. Essentially, the story is this: Corrie ten Boom is hiding Jews in her home to protect them from the Nazis. Nazi soldiers come to her home and ask her if she knows where any Jews are hiding. What is she to do? Should she tell the truth and allow the Nazis to capture the Jews she was trying to protect? Or, should she lie and deny that she knows anything about them? In an instance such as this, where lying may be the only possible way to prevent a horrible evil, perhaps lying would be an acceptable thing to do because it is the lesser of two evils. Such an instance would be somewhat similar to the lies of the Hebrew midwives and Rahab. In an evil world, and in a desperate situation, it may be the right thing to commit a lesser evil, lying, in order to prevent a much greater evil. However, it must be noted that such instances are extremely rare. It is highly likely that the vast majority of people in human history have never faced a situation in which lying was the right thing to do.
Colossians 3:9 says, “Do not lie to each other, since you have taken off your old self with its practices.” Lying is also listed in 1Timothy 1:9-11 as something practiced by the lawless. Furthermore, liars will be among those judged in the end (Revelation 21:8). In contrast, GOD is Truth (Deuteronomy 32:4; 1Samuel 15:29; John 14:6; Romans 3:4) and it is impossible for Him to lie (Numbers 23:19; Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18).
Jesus called Himself the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6), and He expects those who follow Him to be people of Truth. The truth is to be expressed in love (Ephesians 4:15), offering hope to those seeking redemption from the lies of the world.
It is important to note, however, that GOD never condones lies. Despite the “positive” outcome of these lies, the Bible nowhere praises the lies themselves. The Bible nowhere states that there are instances where lying is the right thing to do. At the same time, the Bible does not declare that there is no possible instance in which lying is an acceptable option.
Should a Christian ever lie or bend the truth? To answer that, we must know what GOD thinks about lying. GOD hates lies (Exodus 20:16; Psalm 119:29,163; 120:2; Proverbs 6:16-19; 12:22; 13:5; 1Corinthians 13:6; Colossians 3:9; Ephesians 4:25; 1Timothy 1:9-11; Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18; Revelation 21:8). Lies are not good. But is there ever a time when it’s acceptable to lie in order to save ourselves or others? The Bible nowhere presents an instance where lying is considered to be the right thing to do; however, there have been a few times when it was the lesser evil out of two evils. Time after time, we see that falsehood leads to misery, loss, and judgment. However, even though lying is never the right thing to do, it might be a necessary lesser of two evils forced upon us in order to do what’s best in a sinful and fallen world and prevent an even greater evil. Even GOD’s chosen, Abram (Abraham), lied. Lying is not a good thing. Lying is bad, especially if you lie to good-natured people.
However, in my personal opinion (which is prone to being wrong), lying to those who desire to do evil in order to prevent a greater evil seems wise to me. This is war after all. All around us. We are in a constant war to save souls and protect the ones that are already saved. In war, the ultimate victory is when you are able to use the enemy’s own weapon against himself to defeat him. However, I strongly recommend that you don’t ever lie unless you absolutely must do so in order to save lives. The consequence associated with the risk simply isn’t worth it. If you use a lie against evil it could be a good thing and could potentially save yourself and others. It’s possible to trick evil with its own evil. However, with one misuse of a lie, Abram was treated well because of Sarai, but then got kicked out of the land once his lie was discovered. The lie that Abram told ended up hurting good people and caused Abram and Sarai to be thrown out. Also, how do you think that entire situation made Sarai feel? Her husband told her to be someone else’s wife just so he wouldn’t be murdered. I’m willing to bet she probably felt betrayed and hurt. And if that Pharaoh had taken Sarai for sexual relations, the marriage covenant would have been violated and broken. Before you make your decision on whether or not to use a lie, you need to think about the consequences of your choice. Is the situation dire? Is it a life or death situation? Will telling the truth set you free or lead you to your death? But even if you escape physical death from your lie, will it lead to a spiritual death? Should you risk rotting your character because of this lie? To whom are you lying? Is the person evil? Would GOD want you to lie at that moment or tell the truth? Would your lie prevent an even greater evil? You better be absolutely certain that the other party is in fact an evildoer and darkness dweller before committing to the lie. If you lie to someone of good nature, things will certainly go wrong and be bad.
Lying is a rotten thing to do, and it will rot any good situation. If you lie and don’t prevent a greater evil, you’ve rotted a portion of your character. A lie is a powerful weapon, but it is usually a weapon we end up using against ourselves. Is it worth rotting your character? A lie can be paralleled to the ring that is well known in J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. We can hide behind the cloak of The Lie, and Frodo can hide behind the cloak of The Ring, but it hurts us. The Lie corrodes our integrity and corrupts future judgment. Frodo used The Ring with good intentions, did he not? But it still deteriorated his character, correct? Let us not forget that Gollum had also been a normal Hobbit named Sméagol; however, The Ring (The Lie) eventually corrupted him and changed him. The Ring is one and the same as The Lie. Frodo believed that he could hide behind the cloak of The Ring and it would save him; however, it only hurt him every time he used The Ring. Just as Sméagol and Frodo could not be saved behind the cloak of The Ring, we cannot be saved behind the cloak of The Lie – we might be spared for the time being, but it deteriorates, corrupts, and rots us from the inside out. The only true solution of Frodo’s dilemma was to destroy the ring; likewise, the only true solution to our dilemma is to put the lie where it belongs — in the fire.
Do you know what happens when you make a practice of something? It becomes easier each new time you do it. Change within us is gradual and difficult to notice, but we are all changing every day based on what we choose to believe and do. So, is a lie ever right? No. Is a lie ever acceptable? Yes. But remember — acceptance of something does not mean an approval of that something. Is a lie worth it? In rare occasions, the lie prevents a greater evil (Exodus 1:15-21; Joshua 2:5). You have free will. Choose wisely. Here in this sinful and fallen world, a lie might prevent a greater evil. However, in the new earth to come, lies will never be allowed (Revelation 21:8). So, shouldn’t we be practicing to live like we’re going to live in the life to come?
It is written in Romans 3:3-6 that unbelief will never nullify the faithfulness of GOD. In fact, GOD’s Word will be found true even if every person is found to be a liar. The Lord will be proved right when He wins His case in the court. GOD is entirely just (Acts 17:31; Revelation 20:12) and He will judge the world (Revelation 20:11-15).